110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Composite neonatal and maternal morbidities with small- versus appropriate- for gestational age among uncomplicated obese women undergoing repeat cesarean deliveryFootnote*

, , , , &
Pages 562-567 | Received 15 Apr 2017, Accepted 22 Sep 2017, Published online: 10 Oct 2017
 

Abstract

Purpose: Our goal was to compare composite neonatal and maternal morbidities (composite neonatal morbidity (CNM), composite maternal morbidity (CMM)) among deliveries with small for age (SGA) versus appropriate for gestational age (AGA; birthweight 10–89%) among obese versus non-obese women undergoing repeat cesarean delivery (CD).

Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. Women who had elective CD ≥37 weeks were studied. We excluded multiple gestations, fetal anomalies, > 1 prior CD, and medical diseases. Patients were divided into BMI ≥30 versus <30 kg/m2. CNM included respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, severe intraventricular hemorrhage, seizure, or death; CMM included transfusion, hysterectomy, operative injury, coagulopathy, thromboembolism, pulmonary edema, or death. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for confounding factors.

Results: Of 7561 women, we included 65% were obese and 35% were not. SGA rates differed significantly: 8 versus 12% (p < .001). Overall, CNM was significantly higher in patients with SGA versus AGA (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.04, 95% CI 1.19–3.49). CMM of SGA in obese versus non-obese was statistically different (aOR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02–0.68). Among obese mothers, SGA neonates had significantly higher CNM compared with AGA ones (aOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.03–4.59).

Conclusions: SGA occurred in 8% of low-risk obese women with prior CD. CNM of SGA babies in obese versus non-obese women were similar. Paradoxically, CMM was lower in obese cases, possibly reflecting the caution that obese patients receive preoperatively. Our findings may assist in counseling patients and designing trials.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

* Presented as a poster at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the Society of Reproductive Investigation, San Francisco CA, USA.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.