340
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Risk of intra-amniotic infection/inflammation and respiratory distress syndrome according to the birth order in twin preterm neonates

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1566-1571 | Received 25 Apr 2018, Accepted 11 Sep 2018, Published online: 29 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: Prior studies have suggested that nonpresenting twins are more likely to develop respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) than presenting twins. While the underlying mechanism is not known, exposure to intra-amniotic infection/inflammation (IAI) has been associated with a reduced risk of RDS in singleton gestations. In the current study, we compared the risk of RDS in preterm twin neonates according to birth order with adjustment for the presence or absence of IAI.

Methods: The study population consisted of consecutive twin neonates who delivered ≤35 weeks and underwent amniocentesis within 7 days of delivery. The frequency of RDS and IAI was compared between presenting and nonpresenting twin pairs. Amniotic fluid (AF) was cultured for aerobic/anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasma. IAI was defined as a positive AF culture or an AF white cell count ≥19/mm3.

Results: A total of 120 twin pairs were enrolled. Compared with presenting twins, nonpresenting twins had a lower risk of IAI (36 vs. 26%, respectively, p < .05), but a higher risk of RDS (18 vs. 25%, respectively, p < .05). In multivariate analysis, only IAI remained significantly associated with RDS (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05–0.65), whereas birth order was not.

Conclusions: In preterm twin neonates, the increased risk of RDS in nonpresenting twins is likely due to lower exposure to IAI and not birth order.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning of Korea [2016M3A9B6902061].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.