294
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

First-trimester serum biomarker screening for fetal Down syndrome as a predictor of preterm delivery: a population-based study

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1717-1724 | Received 09 Jun 2018, Accepted 24 Sep 2018, Published online: 29 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between the first-trimester serum biomarker levels (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A:PAPP-A; and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin: b-hCG) and preterm birth; and to create the predictive models for preterm birth in case of strong correlation.

Methods: Secondary analysis on a large prospective database of singleton pregnancies undergoing first-trimester serum screening with complete follow-up for pregnancy outcomes. The multiples of medians (MoM) of the biomarkers were compared between the group of term and preterm/early preterm birth. Predictive models were developed based on adjusted MoMs and logistic regression analysis, and then diagnostic performances in predicting preterm birth were assessed.

Results: Of 24,611 pregnancies eligible for analysis, 1908 (7.8%) and 500 (2.0%) had preterm and early preterm birth, respectively. Medians MoMs of both biomarkers were significantly lower in preterm and early preterm birth group. The predictive models were constructed. Performance in predicting preterm birth of these models yielded the area-under-ROC-curve of 0.560, 0.652, and 0.653 for b-hCG, PAPP-A, and combined biomarkers, respectively. In predicting early preterm birth, the areas-under-the-curve were found to be 0.551, 0.675, and 0.674 for b-hCG, PAPP-A, and combined biomarkers, respectively.

Conclusion: The routine first-trimester serum screening of fetal Down syndrome could also be used as a tool of risk identification of preterm birth. We could take advantage of the screening by incorporating the predictive models into the Down syndrome screening software to report the preterm risk in the same test without extra effort and extra cost

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Research Fund, Chiang Mai University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.