87
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effect of perceptual decision-making on the interpretation of twin fetal heart rate tracings

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 2116-2121 | Received 18 Apr 2020, Accepted 04 Jun 2020, Published online: 29 Jun 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

Decision-making is an integrative process during which multiple sources of available evidence are combined into a singular response. Importantly, subconscious processes occur in perceptual decisions that may influence interpretations of visually displayed data such as fetal heart rate tracings (FHRT), which are typically presented together for twins. To examine the potential impact of subconscious perceptual influences on fetal well-being, differences in assessments of FHRTs for twin gestations presented singly or paired were evaluated for baseline fetal heart rate, variability, accelerations, decelerations, and overall concern.

Study design

Obstetrical nurses (N = 27) assessed FHRTs from 20 twin gestations (each of which had at least one live birth with a 5-min Apgar <7) presented either on the same tracing or as singletons on separate tracings. Nurses were naïve to the fact that the fetal heart rate tracings presented in the unpaired condition were the same as those presented in the paired condition. Assessments were then compared between the two conditions.

Results

Each nurse participant completed ratings on five metrics for each of 20 twin gestations across two conditions (80 FHRT assessments, 400 metrics total per participant). The intraobserver impact of visual context was calculated as the frequency of changed opinions regarding an individual metric (e.g. variability) between the paired and unpaired contexts for each individual fetal heart rate. Assessments of variability (average Kappa = 0.59), decelerations (average Kappa = 0.34), and overall level of concern (average Kappa = 0.33) were moderately to heavily impacted by viewing condition (unpaired vs. paired FHRT). Analysis of interobserver agreement using intraclass correlations (two-way random effect, absolute agreement) indicates poor agreement on unpaired assessments for both accelerations (ICC = 0.01, 95% CI −0.01–0.04) and decelerations (ICC = 0.22, 95% CI 0.15–0.33). These results are mirrored in poor agreement on paired assessments for both accelerations (ICC = 0.00, 95% CI −0.01–0.03) and decelerations (ICC = 0.27, 95% CI 0.19–0.39). There was moderate agreement on overall level of concern for unpaired assessments (ICC = 0.55, 95% CI 0.44–0.67) and near moderate agreement for the paired condition (ICC = 0.45, 95% CI 0.34–0.58).

Conclusions

The simultaneous presentation of fetal heart rate tracings in twin gestations introduces both intraobserver and interobserver variances in the interpretation of variability, accelerations, and decelerations, likely due to the influence of subconscious perceptual decision-making. This may theoretically affect outcomes in cases in which visual information is nuanced. More research is necessary to determine whether the standard protocol of simultaneous assessment of FHRT in twins is subliminally affected by perceptual decision-making.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Jeanne Ludwig-Woods, RN and Stephanie Augustine, RN (Northwell Health) for their aid in selecting fetal heart rate tracings for testing. We also thank Matthew Blitz, MD for collecting the information on adverse outcomes in twin gestations at Northwell Health. Lisa DeTora, PhD (Hofstra University) provided advice on manuscript preparation and data presentation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; there are no funding agencies to acknowledge.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.