136
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

17 Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate use in a rural state

, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 6437-6439 | Received 14 Dec 2020, Accepted 06 Apr 2021, Published online: 25 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Background

17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHP) is used to reduce the recurrent risk of preterm delivery in women with a history of preterm delivery. Meis et al. conducted a double-blind placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of 17OHP and observed a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent preterm delivery. The FDA granted 17OHP a conditional approval on 2011. A second study observed that 17OHP did not decrease the risk of a recurrent preterm delivery. Criticism of the second study derived from a dissimilarity of the study population.

Objective

Our investigation examined the effectiveness of 17OHP in women with a prior preterm delivery in a rural US state with a patient population similar to the original Meis trial.

Study design

17OHP became largely unavailable (due to cost and local pharmacies no longer compounding 17 OHP) and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Health, and Arkansas Medicaid co-operated to make 17OHP available to women with a prior PTB in our state. This study was a retrospective review of the 17OHP that was offered to women with a prior preterm delivery. For our retrospective review, logistic regression was used on cases of prior preterm delivery between January 2014 and December of 2018 to examine the relationship between 17OHP injections and preterm delivery.

Results

A total of 268 women were analyzed for this review. They were divided into three groups: 0 injections, 1–10 injections, and > 10 injections. We found no relationship between 17OHP injections with preterm delivery.

Conclusion

Although our patient population was similar to that of the original Meis trial, our results were more similar to the second study by Blackwell.

Acknowledgment

We thank Donna Eastham, BA, for her help in editing and submission of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest and nothing to disclose.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.