Abstract
Objective
To explore factors associated with a high vaginal GBS load during labor considering (1) the recto-vaginal GBS load at 35–37 weeks’ gestation determined by culture and (2) the vaginal GBS colonization determined by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay during labor.
Methods
From an unselected cohort of 902 pregnant women, we obtained (1) recto-vaginal swabs for culture of GBS at 35–37 weeks’ gestation (GBSrectovag-36), (2) vaginal swabs for GBS PCR detection at labor (PCRvag-labor), and (3) vaginal swabs for culture of GBS at labor (GBSvag-labor). The GBS load was classified semi quantitatively according to a culture protocol without prior broth enrichment of the swab samples: none (0), few (+), some (++), or many (+++) GBS colonies.
Results
Among 902 unselected pregnant women, 859 (95%) had a vaginal swab culture taken at labor, which was classified semi quantitatively. High load GBSvag-labor (+++) were found in 31 participants. GBSrectovag-36 showed a sensitivity of 90% (28/31) and a PPV of 23% (28/121), whereas PCRvag-labor had a sensitivity of 98% (30/31, non-significant difference) and a PPV of 42% (30/71, p < .01). PCR at labor had a lower sensitivity (78%) for detection of vaginal colonization with GBS at labor (any load) compared to recto/vaginal colonization with GBS at 36 weeks (92%). Vaginal colonization with GBS at 36 weeks seemed to have a lower sensitivity for detecting GBS in vagina at labor for high load (48%) and for any load (39%).
Conclusion
PCR at labor has higher detection rate (non-significant) and PPV in identification of laboring women with a high load of vaginal GBS compared with recto-vaginal culture at 36 weeks’ gestation.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Staff at Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, and Clinical Microbiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark. This study was supported by Forskningsraadet Lillebaelt Hospital, Udviklingsraadet Lillebaelt Hospital, Johs. M. Klein og hustrus Mindelegat, Region of Southern Denmark, and Farusa Emballage A/S.
Disclosure statement
No conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).