502
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infant with RDS: evaluation of safety and efficacy

, , &
Pages 6802-6806 | Received 22 Mar 2021, Accepted 27 Apr 2021, Published online: 23 May 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST) is a promising mode of administration that offers the potential to limit barotrauma and prevent lung injury in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Objective

This study assessed the effects of the implementation of MIST on safety and efficacy in infants who met criteria for surfactant administration and were treated by MIST as compared with a historical control group treated with surfactant via an endotracheal tube during mechanical ventilation.

Methods

This retrospective study included infants born between 2012 and 2017 who met the following inclusion criteria: gestational age 23–36 + 6 weeks, a diagnosis of RDS requiring at least 30% oxygen with or without nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). MIST was introduced in 2014 and a comparison was made between the study group who received MIST and the control group who met similar criteria and received surfactant via an endotracheal tube during mechanical ventilation

Results

No significant differences were found between the groups in baseline and demographic data. Severity of initial disease, assessed by the CRIB II score, was similar in the two groups (control 4.6 ± 2.8, MIST 4.4 ± 2.4, p=.995). The requirement for oxygen during the first 3 d of life was significantly lower (area under the curve [AUC]: p=.001) in the MIST group as assessed by the AUC. Likewise, the mean days of oxygen requirement were significantly lower in the MIST group (Control: 10.3 d, MIST: 5.9 d, p=.04). Only six infants in the MIST group (13%) subsequently required intubation for mechanical ventilation, only one of whom adjacent to the procedure. A modest reduction in duration of ventilation was also noted. Duration of admission was 32 ± 23 d in the control group and 26 ± 21 d in the MIST group, p=.061. No significant differences were found between the groups in the incidence of major morbidities or mortality. No major adverse events related to the procedure were observed.

Conclusions

Transition to MIST was associated with significantly reduced need for oxygen, mechanical ventilation and surfactant, and a borderline shortened NICU admission.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.