202
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Which is the best ultrasound parameter for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome within 1 day of delivery?

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 8571-8579 | Received 05 Mar 2021, Accepted 01 Oct 2021, Published online: 12 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

Objective

To compare the accuracies of several sonographic parameters for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome (APO) prior to delivery.

Methods

This was a prospective study of fetuses attending the day hospital unit of a tertiary referral hospital that were scanned at 34-41 weeks and gave birth within 24 h of examination. APO was defined as a composite of abnormal intrapartum fetal heart rate or intrapartum fetal scalp pH < 7.20 requiring urgent cesarean section, neonatal umbilical cord pH < 7.10, 5’ Apgar score <7 and postpartum admission to neonatal or pediatric intensive care units. The accuracies of the middle cerebral, vertebral and umbilical arteries pulsatility index multiples of the median (MoM), the cerebroplacental and vertebroplacental ratios MoM and the EFW in centiles for the prediction of APO was evaluated by means of ROC curves and logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 2140 fetuses were prospectively scanned, however only 182 entered into spontaneous or induced labor and were delivered within 24 h of examination. In this group, MCA PI MoM was the best predictor of APO (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI 0.66–0.85, p < .0001) followed by the CPR MoM (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.84, p < .0001) and the VPR MoM (AUC = 0.71, 95% CI 0.61–0.81, p < .001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that MCA PI MoM was the only independent determinant for the prediction of APO.

Conclusion

In a high-risk population of third-trimester fetuses delivering within 24 h of examination, the outcome may be moderately anticipated just with the information provided by the cerebral flow.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.