337
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prospective evaluation of placental abruption in nulliparous women

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 8603-8610 | Received 22 Jun 2021, Accepted 01 Oct 2021, Published online: 23 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Introduction

Because most data on placental abruption are derived from retrospective studies, multiple sources of bias may have affected the results. Thus, we aimed to characterize risk factors and outcomes for placental abruption in a large prospective cohort of nulliparous women.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of women enrolled in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring-to-be (nuMom2b) study, a prospective observational cohort. Participants were recruited in their first trimester of pregnancy from 8 sites and had 4 study visits, including at delivery. Placental abruption was defined by confirmed clinical criteria. The primary analysis was restricted to abruption identified antepartum and intrapartum. As a secondary analysis, we examined antepartum and intrapartum abruptions separately. We compared risk factors (maternal demographic and clinical characteristics) and outcomes in women with and without placental abruption using univariable and multivariable analyses as appropriate.

Results

9450 women were included in the primary analysis. Abruption was identified in 0.66% (n = 62), of which 35 (56%) were antepartum and 27 (44%) intrapartum. For women with abruption, the mean gestational age at delivery was 35.6 ± 4.4 weeks and 38.8 ± 2.2 weeks for women without abruption. Gravidity was associated with abruption (OR 3.1, 95% CI: 1.6–6.0). In univariate analysis, abruption was associated with cesarean delivery (OR 3.7, 95% CI: 2.2–6.0), blood transfusion (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 1.4–10.7), PPROM (OR 9.0, 95% CI: 5.4–15.1), preterm birth (OR 8.5, 95% CI: 5.1–14.2), SGA (OR 4.0, 95% CI: 2.3–6.95), RDS (OR 5.5, 95% CI: 2.6–11.2), IVH 20.2 (OR 20.2, 95% CI: 5.9–68.8) and ROP (OR 12.2, 95% CI: 2.8–52.6). However, after adjustment for confounders including gestational age, abruption was only associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery and blood transfusion. Results were similar when restricted to antepartum and intrapartum abruptions.

Conclusion

Abruption was identified in <1% of nulliparous women. However, few maternal risk factors were identified. Neonatal morbidities were associated with an abruption and were primarily driven by gestational age due to preterm birth.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study is supported by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [U10 HD063020, U10 HD063037, U10 HD063053].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.