Traumatic brain injury during pregnancy is associated with increased rate of cesarean section: a nationwide multi-register study in Finland

Abstract

Objective

The literature on the incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) during pregnancy is lacking. Furthermore, only studies with small sample size have analyzed the impact of TBI during pregnancy to maternal and fetal outcomes. Thus, we aim to report the incidence of TBIs during pregnancy and study the pregnancy outcomes using nationwide high-quality registers.

Methods

This nationwide retrospective register-based matched cohort study utilized two national registers. All fertile-aged (15–49 years) women with a TBI hospitalization period during pregnancy were retrieved the Care Register for Health Care. Data were then linked with the data from the National Medical Birth Register (MBR). Propensity score matching was conducted according to maternal age during pregnancy, previous cesarean section (CS), maternal smoking status, maternal body mass index, and maternal gestational diabetes. The matching was conducted using the nearest neighbor methods with a caliber width if 0.15, and with a ratio 1:3 (patients/references). Adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between patient group and reference group using Chi-squared tests.

Results

A total of 392 women having a TBI during pregnancy were found. The control group consisted of 722,497 women without TBI during pregnancy. Of the TBIs occurring during pregnancy, the most common types of TBIs were concussion (S06.0) (n = 359, 91.6%), diffuse traumatic brain injury (S06.2) (n = 11, 2.8%), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (n = 7, 1.8%), and unspecified intracranial injury S06.9 (n = 6, 1.5%). The incidence rates of pregnancies with a TBI have remained similar during pregnancy in Finland, peaking at 0.8 per 1000 pregnancies in 2016. The Chi-squared test showed higher rate for CS among women with TBI than for their matched references (21.4% vs. 15.5%, p = .008). Especially, women with TBI during 3rd trimester had higher rate for CS (29.0 vs. 15.0%, p = .016).

Conclusions

The main findings of this study were that the incidence rates for TBI during pregnancy have remained similar during our study period (2004–2018). TBI during pregnancy, even a mild one, is associated with an increased rate for CS. Especially, TBI during the 3rd trimester was associated with high rate for CS, but the etiology behind this remains unknown. In addition, we found no evidence of difference in fetal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, or need for intensive care unit. Future studies should focus on the indications for elective CS, and reasons for unplanned CS among women with TBI during pregnancy, as these could possibly provide important information on the effects of TBI on the course of childbirth.

Keywords:

• Traumatic brain injury
• epidemiology
• pregnancy
• delivery
• neonatal health

Introduction

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are common as those affect more than 10 million people worldwide annually [1], with the most common causes being traffic accidents, falls, and sports related activities [2]. An international study has estimated the incidence of TBI globally to be approximately 369 per 100,000 person-years [3]. For fertile-aged women, TBI is reported to cause disorders in the menstrual cycle and nearly 50% of women report amenorrhea following TBI [4,5]. In Finland, the incidence of TBI hospitalization in fertile-aged woman has increased over twofold (150%) between 1998 and 2018 [6]. However, there are little studies on the effects of TBI during pregnancy.

Currently, the effects of TBI on pregnancy and delivery are known poorly. TBIs have major complications that can affect the mother and the fetus. For instance, one of the major consequence of TBI is elevation of intracranial pressure that is known to be an independent risk factor associated with a risk of death, decrease in functional capacity, and cognition of TBI patients [7,8]. One of the potential risks in TBI soon before childbirth may be the elevation of cerebrospinal fluid pressure increase during delivery in a response to pain [9], causing further complications in TBI patient. A recent meta-analysis published in 2023, with a total of 43 patients found that fetal death rate was highest in TBIs occurring during 2nd trimester [10]. As there are no proper evidence on the subject, it is unknown whether vaginal delivery is safe for patients who have experienced TBI during pregnancy.

The aim of this nationwide register study is to report the incidence of TBI during pregnancy and to investigate the impact of TBI during pregnancy on pregnancies and deliveries.

Materials and methods

In this nationwide retrospective register-based matched cohort study, data from the Care Register for Health Care were linked with the data from the National Medical Birth Register (MBR) to evaluate the effects of TBIs during pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes. Both registers are maintained by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. The study period was from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2018.

All fertile-aged (15–49 years) women with a hospitalization period with a TBI diagnosis during our study period were retrieved from the Care Register for Health Care. The Care Register for Health Care contains data on the patients treated in hospitals as inpatients, surgeries, and outpatient care in specialized healthcare (including emergency department visits) in secondary and tertiary level units. Finland has universal healthcare with minimal costs per visit for patients and thus, all Finnish inhabitants are eligible to this social healthcare in public healthcare [11]. The quality of the Care Register for Health Care has shown to be good [12]. TBI was defined as a hospitalization period following TBI based on ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases 10th revision) codes. The following ICD-10 codes from the Care Register for Health Care were included: S06.0 (Concussion), S06.1 (Traumatic cerebral edema), S06.2 (Diffuse traumatic brain injury), S06.3 (Focal traumatic brain injury), S06.4 (Epidural hemorrhage), S06.5 (Traumatic subdural hemorrhage), S06.6 (Traumatic subdural hemorrhage), S06.8 (Other specified intracranial injury), and S06.9 (Unspecified intracranial injury). To identify only new TBIs and not the control appointments, only TBIs with over one-year period from the previous appointment with the TBI diagnosis were included in this study.

Data retrieved from the Care Register for Health Care were combined with data from the National MBR using the pseudonymized identification number of the mother. The MBR contains information on all pregnancies, delivery statistics, and the perinatal outcomes of births with a birthweight of ≥500 g or a gestational age ≥22 + 0. The MBR has a coverage of 100% [13,14]. The dates of the TBI diagnosis and the dates of the pregnancies were used to identify the pregnancies with a TBI occurring during pregnancy. Multiple pregnancies and pregnancies with missing maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) were excluded from the analysis. Multiple pregnancies were excluded, as these are more commonly more complicating events for both, fetuses and mothers and therefore they are not comparable to singleton pregnancies [15].

Statistics

The annual incidences of TBIs during pregnancy were calculated using the annual total number of deliveries obtained from the MBR. During our study period, the annual total number of deliveries decreased from 57,527 pregnancies in 2004 to 46,964 pregnancies in 2018 in Finland. The incidences are presented as TBIs per 1000 pregnancies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The CIs for the incidences were calculated using Poisson’s regression.

A flowchart of patient selection is presented in Figure 1. A total of 392 patients with TBI during pregnancy were identified, and the control group consisted of 722,497 pregnancies without TBI. Propensity score matching resulted in 392 patients with three reference pregnancies for each patient, comprising a total of 1176 matched pregnancies in the reference group. Propensity score matching was conducted using the nearest neighbor methods with a caliber width if 0.15, and with a ratio 1:3 (patients/references), as the size of our data was large, and the covariate balance remained acceptable. Covariate balance was measured by calculating the z-difference between the patient group and the reference groups [16]. A z-difference of less than ±1 was considered acceptable. Propensity score matching was conducted according to maternal age during pregnancy, previous CS, maternal smoking status, maternal BMI, and maternal gestational diabetes (GDM). The matching variables were selected according to previous knowledge on clinical risk factors for adverse maternal or fetal outcomes [17–23]. Details of maternal smoking status during pregnancy are collected during visits to maternity clinics and can be either nonsmoker, smoking during first semester, smoker or unknown. According to a reliability study on the MBR in 1991, the reliability of the smoking status variable was found to be good [24]. GDM was diagnosed using the 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. A flowchart on forming the study groups and how the propensity score was conducted is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study population. Data from the MBR were combined with data on the diagnosed TBI in the Care Register for Health Care. Multiple pregnancies and pregnancies with missing body mass index (BMI) were excluded from the analysis.

Continuous variables were interpreted as mean with standard deviation or as median with interquartile range based on variable distribution. Categorized variables were presented as absolute numbers and percentages with 95% CIs. The 95% CIs for rates were calculated using Poisson’s regression. Finnish research legislation regarding register studies and the secondary use of routinely collected healthcare data prevents reporting of events with absolute numbers below 5 due to possible identification of an individual. Therefore, all numbers below 5 are presented as <5 in tables. After propensity score matching, the adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were compared between patient group and reference group using Chi-squared tests. Adverse maternal outcomes were overall cesarean section (CS), induction of labor, uterine curettage, and manual placenta removal. Due to low number of pregnancies, CS classified as elective or unplanned (included emergency and urgent CS). The adverse neonatal outcomes were needed for intensive care unit (NICU), preterm birth (<37 + 0 weeks), low birth weight (LBW, <2500 grams), and perinatal mortality.

In the subgroup analysis, women with TBI were divided into three groups, based on which trimester the TBI occurred. These patients were then compared to their matched pairs. The date of giving birth and registered length of the pregnancy were used to calculate the starting date of the pregnancy. Information about the time of the TBI in relation to the progression of the pregnancy was gained by dividing the pregnancy into trimesters using the length of the pregnancy. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The results of this study are reported according to the STROBE guidelines [25].

Ethics

All methods were carried in accordance with Finnish regulations. The Ethical Committee of Tampere University hospital waived the ethical committee evaluation of all retrospective studies utilizing routinely collected healthcare data and this decision is based on the law of medical research 488/1999 and the law of patient rights 785/1992. In accordance with the Finnish regulations (the law of secondary use of routinely collected healthcare data 552/2019), no informed written consent was required because of the retrospective register-based study design and the patients were not contacted. Both the National MBR and the Care Register for Health Care have the same unique pseudonymized identification number for each patient. The pseudonymization was made by the Finnish data authority Findata. The authors did not have access to the pseudonymization key, as it is maintained by Findata. Permission for use of these data was granted by Findata after evaluation of the study protocol (permission number: THL/1756/14.02.00/2020).

Results

In total, 40,028 suffered a TBI during our study period. A total of 392 women had a TBI during pregnancy. The matched reference group consisted of 1176 women without TBI during pregnancy. Of the TBIs occurring during pregnancy, the most common type of TBIs were concussion (S06.0) (n = 359, 91.6%), diffuse traumatic brain injury (S06.2) (n = 11, 2.8%), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (n = 7, 1.8%), and unspecified intracranial injury S06.9 (n = 6, 1.5%). No other TBI diagnosis occurred more than five times. The incidence rates of pregnancies with a TBI have remained similar during pregnancy in Finland, peaking at 0.8 per 1000 pregnancies in 2016 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Incidence rates as per 1000 pregnancies with 95% confidence intervals of pregnancies with TBI during years 2004–2018 in Finland.

Propensity score matching led to 392 pregnancies in patient group, and 1176 matched references. The differences in the matching variables between the two groups were low, as the z-differences remained between ±1. Women in the TBI group were younger than the reference group including all pregnancies without TBI (28.5 years, SD 6.5 vs. 29.8 years, SD 5.4). High rate of smokers after 1st trimester was found in the TBI group (18.4%, CI 14.4–23.1) (Table 1). The women in TBI group had lower rate of spontaneous vaginal birth (66.1% vs. 75.6%) and higher rates of assisted vaginal (12.5% vs. 8.7%), unplanned CS (11.7% vs. 9.0%), and elective CS (9.7% vs. 6.5%) compared to the matched reference group adjusted for confounding factors (Table 2). A total of 6 (1.5%, CI 0.6–3.3) emergency CS were found among women with TBI during pregnancy, and 11 (0.9%, CI 0.5–1.7) emergency CS among matched references.

Table 1. Patient characteristics before and after propensity score matching.

	All pregnancies
	Patient group		Reference group		Matched reference group
	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)
Total number of pregnancies	392		722,497		1176
Age (mean; SD)	28.5 (6.5)		29.8 (5.4)		28.5 (5.9)
BMI (mean; SD) (kg/m^2)	24.3 (4.6)		24.4 (4.9)		24.1 (4.5)
Previous CS^a	52	13.3 (9.9–17.4)	86,926	12.0 (12.0–12.1)	148	12.6 (10.6–14.8)
Smoking status
Smoker during 1st trimester	29	7.4 (5.0–10.6)	44,141	6.1 (6.1–6.2)	79	6.7 (5.3–8.4)
Smoker after 1st trimester	72	18.4 (14.4–23.1)	73,430	10.2 (10.1–10.2)	229	19.5 (17.0–22.2)
Status marked as unknown	16	4.1 (2.3–6.6)	17,032	2.4 (2.3–2.4)	40	3.4 (2.4–4.6)
Gestational diabetes	47	12.0 (8.8–15.9)	105,528	14.6 (14.5–14.7)	132	11.2 (9.4–13.3)
TBI
1st trimester	198	50.5 (43.7–58.1)	–		–
2nd trimester	125	31.9 (26.5–38.0)	–		–
3rd trimester	69	17.6 (13.7–22.3)	–		–

Pregnancies with traumatic brain injury (TBI) were compared with pregnancies without (TBI) during pregnancy in reference group. Rates are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

^a CS: cesarean section.

Table 2. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during pregnancy, when compared to reference group consisting of pregnancies without.

	All pregnancies
	Patient group		Matched reference group
	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)
Total number of pregnancies	392		1176
Maternal outcomes
Mode of delivery
Spontaneous vaginal	259	66.1 (58.3–74.6)	892	75.6 (71.0–81.0)
Assisted vaginal^a	49	12.5 (9.3–16.5)	102	8.7 (7.1–10.5)
Unplanned CS^b	46	11.7 (8.6–15.7)	106	9.0 (7.4–10.9)
Elective CS	38	9.7 (6.9–13.3)	76	6.5 (5.1–8.1)
Labor induction	87	22.2 (17.8–27.4)	238	20.2 (17.8–23.0)
Uterine curettage	<5	<1.3%	7	0.6 (0.2–1.2)
Manual placenta removal	<5	<1.3%	15	1.3 (0.7–2.1)
Fetal outcomes
NICU^c	47	12.0 (8.8–15.9)	128	10.9 (9.1–12.9)
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	21	5.4 (3.3–8.2)	56	4.8 (3.6–6.2)
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	19	4.8 (2.9–7.6)	31	2.6 (1.8–3.7)
Perinatal mortality	<5	<1.3	<5	<0.4

All pregnancies and matched pregnancies are presented separately. Rates are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

^a Includes vaginal breech deliveries, vacuum delivery, and forceps delivery.

^b CS: cesarean section.

^c NICU: need for intensive care unit.

In a subgroup analysis for TBIs during different stages of pregnancy, a high rate of labor induction was seen in pregnancies with a TBI during first trimester compared to the reference group (24.2%, 95% vs. 19.2%, 95%). In addition, the rate of CS was higher in all TBI groups compared to the reference groups (Table 3). The Chi-squared test showed higher rate for CS among women with TBI than for their matched references (21.4% vs. 15.5%, p = .008). Especially, women with TBI during 3rd trimester had higher rate for CS. (29.0 vs. 15.0%, p = .016). No evidence of difference was found in the fetal outcomes (Table 4).

Table 3. Subgroup analyses maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with traumatic brain injury during pregnancy, when compared to reference group consisting of matched pregnancies without TBI based on which trimester the TBI occurred.

	TBI in 1st trimester			Matched pregnancies		TBI in 2nd trimester		Matched pregnancies		TBI in 3rd trimester		Matched pregnancies
	n	% (CI)	n		% (CI)	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)	n	% (CI)
Total number of pregnancies	198		594			125		375		69		207
Maternal outcomes
Mode of delivery
Spontaneous vaginal	130	65.7 (64.9–80.0)	446		75.1 (68.3–82.4)	85	68.0 (54.3–84.1)	286	76.3 (67.7–85.6)	44	63.8 (46.3–85.6)	158	76.3 (64.5–89.2)
Assisted vaginal^a	30	15.2 (10.2–21.6)	53		8.9 (6.7–11.7)	14	11.2 (6.1–18.8)	31	8.3 (5.6–11.7)	5	7.2 (2.4–16.9)	18	8.6 (5.2–13.7)
Unplanned CS^b	23	11.6 (7.4–17.4)	52		8.8 (6.5–11.5)	14	11.2 (6.1–18.8)	38	10.1 (7.2–13.9)	9	13.0 (6.0–24.8)	16	7.7 (4.4–12.6)
Elective CS	15	7.6 (4.2–12.5)	43		7.2 (5.2–9.8)	12	9.6 (5.0–16.8)	20	5.3 (3.3–8.2)	11	15.9 (8.0–28.5)	15	7.2 (4.1–12.0)
Labor induction	48	24.2 (17.9–32.1)	114		19.2 (15.8–23.1)	26	20.8 (13.6–30.5)	86	22.9 (18.3–28.3)	13	18.8 (10.0–32.2)	38	18.4 (13.0–25.2)
Uterine curettage	<5	<2.5%	<5		<0.8%	0	0	<5	<1.3%	0	0	0	0
Manual placenta removal	0	0	8		1.3 (0.6–2.7)	<5	<4.0%	7	1.9 (0.8–3.8)	<5	<7.2%	<5	<2.4%
Fetal outcomes
NICU^c	23	11.6 (7.4–17.4)	57		9.6 (7.3–12.4)	14	11.2 (6.1–18.8)	44	11.7 (8.5–15.6)	10	14.5 (7.0–26.7)	24	11.6 (7.4–17.3)
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	9	4.5 (2.1–8.6)	21		3.5 (2.2–5.4)	6	4.8 (1.8–10.4)	19	5.1 (3.1–7.9)	6	8.7 (3.2–18.9)	13	6.3 (3.3–10.7)
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	10	5.1 (2.4–9.3)	14		2.4 (1.3–4.0)	5	4.0 (1.3–9.3)	7	1.9 (0.8–3.8)	<5	<7.2%	7	3.4 (1.4–7.0)
Perinatal mortality	0	0	0		0	<5	<4.0%	<5	<1.3%	0		<5	<2.4%

^a Includes breech presentation, vacuum delivery, and forceps delivery.

^b CS: cesarean section.

^c NICU: need for intensive care unit.

Table 4. Statistical significance measured for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes between patient group and matched references using Pearson’s Chi-squared test.

	Patient group		Matched reference group
Maternal outcomes	n	%	n	%	p Value
All pregnancies with TBI
Total number of pregnancies	392		1176
Maternal outcomes
Cesarean section	84	21.4	182	15.5	.008
Labor induction	87	22.2	238	20.2	.450
Uterine curettage	<5	<1.3	7	0.6	.682
Manual placenta removal	<5	<1.3	15	0.2	.584
Fetal outcomes
NICU^a	47	12.0	128	10.9	.611
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	21	5.4	56	4.7	.736
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	19	4.8	31	2.6	.051
Perinatal mortality	<5	<1.3	<5	<0.4	1.000
TBI in 1st trimester
Total number of pregnancies	198		594
Maternal outcomes
Cesarean section	38	19.2	94	15.8	.322
Labor induction	48	24.2	114	19.2	.188
Uterine curettage	<5	<2.5	<5	<0.8	1.000
Manual placenta removal	0	0	8	1.3	.218
Fetal outcomes
NICU^a	23	11.6	56	9.4	.451
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	9	4.5	21	3.5	.667
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	10	5.1	15	2.5	.127
Perinatal mortality	0	0	0	0	–
TBI in 2nd trimester
Total number of pregnancies	125		375
Maternal outcomes
Cesarean section	26	20.8	58	15.5	.214
Labor induction	26	20.8	85	22.7	.756
Uterine curettage	0	0	<5	<1.3	.562
Manual placenta removal	<5	<4.0	7	1.9	.681
Fetal outcomes
NICU^a	14	11.2	41	10.9	1.000
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	6	4.8	19	5.1	1.000
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	5	4.0	7	1.9	3.114
Perinatal mortality	<5	<4.0	<5	<1.3	1.000
TBI in 3rd trimester
Total number of pregnancies	69		207
Maternal outcomes
Cesarean section	20	29.0	31	15.0	.016
Labor induction	13	18.8	38	18.4	1.000
Uterine curettage	0	0	0	0	–
Manual placenta removal	<5	<7.2	<5	<2.4	.561
Fetal outcomes
NICU^a	10	14.5	24	11.6	.672
Preterm birth (<37 + 0)	6	8.7	13	6.3	.681
Low birthweight (<2500 g)	<5	<7.2	7	2.4	.594
Perinatal mortality	0	0	<5	<2.4	1.000

Test was performed first for all pregnancies with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and then for TBI in different trimesters separately. Pregnancies with TBI were always compared to group of their matched pregnancies.

^a NICU: need for intensive care unit.

When only 33 cases of severe TBIs included (concussion excluded), no evidence of difference was found in the rate for CS (24.2% vs. 16.2%, p = .434), or neonatal outcomes, when compared to their matched references.

Discussion

The main findings of this study were that the incidence rates for TBI have remained similar during our study period. Also, TBI during pregnancy was associated with increased rate for CS during pregnancy. Interestingly, especially, TBI during 3rd trimester was associated with high rate for CS. In addition, we found no evidence of difference in fetal outcomes, such as preterm birth, LBW, or NICU between women with TBI during pregnancy and reference group.

The previous studies on the effects of TBIs on maternal and fetal outcomes during pregnancy are lacking, and therefore, the results of this study should provide basic information on rare events such as TBIs during pregnancy. A recent study in Finland using a large nationwide study-sample found that TBIs occurring before pregnancy increased the odds for CS, and instrumental vaginal deliveries among women with previous TBI [6]. This study concluded that history of TBI should be acknowledged as a possible factor affecting the delivery and health of the neonate [6]. In our study, the odds for CS was also higher, which is in line with these results. TBI in the 3rd trimester, despite the lowest absolute number of deliveries, showed important difference in the rates for CS. However, due to crude nature of our data, the exact reason for this remains unknown. Also, over 50% of CS deliveries in this group were elective CS, but the rate for unplanned CS was also high. A TBI in the 3rd trimester might be a reason to convert a trial of labor into elective CS, but as the indications for elective CS is not collected in the MBR, the reason for the elective CS remains unknown. One possible explanation might be the short time difference between TBI and delivery, which could lower the threshold for elective CS by the clinician and mother, as the capability to give birth in a short period after TBI remains unknown due to lack of knowledge on this topic. In addition, post TBI psychological symptoms might also have effect on the decision about the mode of delivery [26]. Especially, TBIs in 3rd trimester should be acknowledged as a possible factor affecting the course of delivery and more research on this topic is warranted. Future studies should focus on the indications for elective CS, and reasons for unplanned CS among women with TBI during pregnancy, as these could possibly provide important information on the effects of TBI on the course of childbirth.

Interestingly, the fetal outcomes among women with TBI during pregnancy were not impaired. This is an important finding, as there are no previous studies using sufficient number of patients with TBI during pregnancy. A recent meta-analysis about TBIs during pregnancy found that the fetal death rate was highest in TBIs occurring during 2nd trimester [10]. However, no fetal death was observed in mild TBI group [10]. However, the total number of patients in this meta-analysis was only 43 [10]. The latest study examining the effects of TBIs before pregnancy found that the odds for preterm deliveries, and NICU was higher among women with TBI before pregnancy [6]. However, our results suggest that TBI at any trimester of pregnancy is not crucial for the health of neonate. However, it is good to note that most of the TBIs in this study are presumably mild TBIs, and the conclusions about the effects of moderate or severe TBIs cannot be taken. In an expert’s viewpoint on the management of moderate and severe TBIs during pregnancy, the status of the mother and fetus is critical and the management is balancing between maternal health and neonatal health [27], meaning that the results of these studies are most likely not comparable to these.

The strength of our study is the large nationwide study population with a long study period, making it possible to compare largest patient groups so far on this topic. On such rare events as TBIs during pregnancy, no previous studies have been able to investigate these events using proper data. Therefore, most of the previous studies have been case reports or studies using small population. The register data used in our study are routinely collected with structured forms with national instructions, which ensures good coverage and reduces possible reporting and selection bias [14]. Furthermore, the quality and coverage of both registers included in this study is high [14,12]. The advantage of this study compared to previous ones is the large national research material in a country with uniform delivery-related guidelines and attitudes.

The main limitation of our study is the missing clinical information on TBIs (e.g. radiological findings and TBI severity indices such as Glasgow Coma Scale). Also, our study includes only women who ended up giving birth, as those possible patients suffering a truly severe TBI leading to miscarriage or even death are not available in our data. Also, majority of the patients in this study suffered a concussion, meaning that patient group is probably mostly consisting of the patients with mild TBI.

Conclusions

The main findings of this study were that the incidence rates for TBI during pregnancy have remained similar during our study period (2004–2018). TBI during pregnancy, even a mild one, is associated with an increased rate for CS. Especially, TBI during the 3rd trimester was associated with high rate for CS, but the etiology behind this remains unknown. In addition, we found no evidence of difference in fetal outcomes, such as preterm birth, low birth weight, or NICU, and therefore, it appears that mild TBIs during pregnancy have less impact on fetal health. Future studies should focus on the indications for elective CS, and reasons for unplanned CS among women with TBI during pregnancy, as these could possibly provide important information on the effects of TBI on the course of childbirth.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.