1,010
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Assessment of D-dimer levels in pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19: A case-control study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2231123 | Received 07 May 2022, Accepted 25 Jun 2023, Published online: 02 Jul 2023

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to evaluate D-dimer levels in pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19.

Methods

This single-center study was carried out in a tertiary center hospital serving as a pandemic hospital. 151 pregnant women with COVID-19 diagnosis were included as the study group, and 70 healthy pregnant women as the control group. The data were analyzed separately in 3 different trimesters of pregnancy.

Results

Of the 221 pregnant women included in the study, 151 had a diagnosis of COVID-19. 70 healthy pregnant women were taken as the control group. It was observed that D-dimer values in pregnancy increased as the trimesters progressed. No significant difference was observed when this was compared with pregnant women with COVID-19 (p = .428, .75, .927 according to the 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimesters, respectively).

Conclusion

The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism is difficult due to the lack of reliable alternative D-dimer thresholds for pregnant patients. On the other hand, D-dimer elevation continues to be a sign of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. The situation remains uncertain in patients who are pregnant and have COVID-19. Maybe D-dimer value should be removed from being a poor prognosis criterion in pregnant women.

Introduction

Normal pregnancy is a state of hypercoagulation caused by increased procoagulant concentration, decreased anticoagulant levels and decreased fibrinolytic activity, which is regulated by the balance between plasminogen activators and inhibitors. With the general effect of hypercoagulation and hypofibrinolysis caused by pregnancy, an increase occurs in fibrin degradation products including D-dimer and intravascular thrombosis [Citation1]. This condition is designed to protect women against miscarriage or bleeding during childbirth.

D-dimer is formed by the destruction of fibrin by plasmin [Citation2]. D-dimer was first isolated in the 1970s [Citation3]. D-dimer measurements act as a global indicator of coagulation and activation of fibrinolytic systems. As the activity of plasmin increases in the blood, an increase in D-dimer levels is observed. In cases of venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, their value can be very high [Citation4].

There are many studies evaluating thresholds adjusted for normal D-dimer levels between trimesters of pregnancy. Many studies from the 1990s have shown that D-dimer levels increase steadily throughout pregnancy [Citation5]. The specificity of the D-dimer test is significantly reduced during pregnancy [Citation6]. In particular, most of the suspicions of pulmonary embolism occur in the third trimester, where the specificity of the D-dimer test approaches 0%.

The disease due to coronavirus infection appeared in Wuhan, China in December 2019, spread rapidly worldwide and created a major public health problem [Citation7]. Some hemostatic abnormalities have been reported with Covid-19 survivors with significantly higher D-dimer levels [Citation8]. However, an optimal cutoff value for D-dimer and its effect on prognosis have not yet been assessed to predict mortality in admission. Therefore, studies comparing D-dimer values of COVID-19 patients and healthy pregnant women are needed. Our study gives the opportunity to make this comparison.

Material and Methods

This single-center, case-control study was conducted at a tertiary center, in Turkey, between May to July 2020. The annual birth number in our department is approximately 11000. During the pandemic period, many hospitals in our country were declared as "pandemic hospitals." The hospital to which our clinic belongs to is one of them. Therefore, approximately 50 to 100 COVID-19 positive pregnant women apply to our clinic per month. The study protocol was approved by The Local Ethics Committee and registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04389554)

Our study criteria included 18–45 years old pregnant women with a history of COVID-19 positive reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We excluded that potential source of elevated D-dimer such as morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2), advanced maternal age (>45 years); family or personal history of VTE and antiphospholipid syndrome, multiple gestations, the clinical story of neoplasia, burns, trauma, comorbid disease (pregestational diabetes mellitus, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, chronic kidney and liver disease, autoimmune diseases, etc.), coagulopathies, have been admitted to our hospital or surgery in the previous four weeks.

The study was planned in two groups. The patients were divided into 3 different subgroups according to their gestational periods: thirty-seven as 1st trimester, sixty-nine as 2nd trimester and one hundred twelve as 3rd trimester. The control group was formed from healthy pregnant women with similar demographic data, with a ratio of approximately 2:1.

There are over thirty D-dimer measurements. Among them there are three general types: immunofluorescent assays, latex agglutination assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) [Citation9]. In the study, we used a particle-reinforced immunoturbidimetric test method for the quantitative determination of cross-linked fibrin degradation products (INNOVANCE® D-Dimer, BCS® XP System, Siemens). Samples were taken into citrated tubes. After centrifugation at 3500 rpm at room temperature for 10 min in the lab, it was worked within 4 h at the latest. In our hospital, the cutoff point of D-dimer is 0,55 mg/L as the exclusion criteria of the venous thromboembolism.

Data analysis will be done using SPSS (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data will be prepared as mean ± standard deviation and mean (min-max). Student’s t-test will be used to compare continuous parametric variables, and Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare non-parametric data between the two groups. In all calculations, p-value less than .05 will be considered statistically significant.

Results

Two hundred and twenty one pregnant women were contained in the study. One hundred and fifty one of these pregnant women were diagnosed with COVID-19 and were considered as the study group. The other 70 are healthy pregnant women with similar demographic data and trimesters. Only age was compared as demographic data (). Comparison of D-dimer values of all pregnant women with COVID-19 and D-dimer values of healthy pregnant women is given in . We divided all pregnant women into trimesters and compared them in terms of D-dimer values. This assessment is given in .

Table 1. Comparison of demographic data.

Table 2. Comparison of D-dimer values.

Table 3. Comparison of D-Dimer values according to trimesters.

Discussion

Both pregnancy and COVID-19 disease have a coagulation-enhancing effect in the body [Citation10]. High D-dimer values may be associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 disease [Citation11]. However, this issue has not been studied much in pregnant women. As the trimester progresses, physiologically, D-dimer values increase in pregnancy [Citation12]. Our study showed that D-dimer values increased as the trimester progresses in pregnancy. However, no significant difference was found in the elevation of D-dimer in pregnant patients with and without COVID-19.

Although many studies have examined the change of D-dimer during pregnancy and puerperium, it has not been possible to compare D-dimer concentrations because different results are obtained depending on the instrument being measured. As the D-dimer does not have a uniform simple structure, assays may vary [Citation13]. In our study, we analyzed a good sample size of both healthy pregnant women and pregnant women with COVID-19 using the same measurement method. We know that the D-dimer value increases as the trimesters progress in both pregnancy and COVID-19. However, this increase was not significantly different between groups. Because in both cases, D-dimer can rise anyway. Therefore, it comes to mind that D-dimer may not be reliable both in the diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism and in predicting the prognosis of COVID-19 in pregnant women with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy is still difficult due to the absence of D-dimer thresholds and the lack of adequate prospective studies on clinical probability assessment [Citation14]. In addition to an increased risk of pulmonary embolism, especially in the third trimester, most of the common venous thromboembolism symptoms, such as leg swelling, shortness of breath, tachypnea, and tachycardia, are also associated with normal pregnancy [Citation15]. Different D-dimer thresholds have been proposed, but there is no approved cutoff value for D-dimer to safely exclude PE during pregnancy. For now, imaging tests continue to be cornerstones in the diagnosis of PE suspected in pregnancy due to the lack of reliable alternative D-dimer thresholds for pregnant patients [Citation16].

Thromboembolic prophylaxis is recommended for people diagnosed with COVID-19 because of the coagulapathy caused by the disease [Citation17]. The same is true for pregnant women. In fact, prophylaxis is even more important as pregnancy itself can cause a coagulation. It should be considered together with the patient [Citation18]. According to American Society of Hematology guidelines, anticoagulant therapy should be offered to patients with COVID-19 with high D-dimer values [Citation19]. However, there are some gaps about the treatment effect in pregnant women with COVID-19. In the panel where the guide was created, the priority of working on this subject was targeted.

According to the current literature, D-dimer elevation is one of the indicators of poor prognosis in COVID-19 disease [Citation20]. According to the current literature, D-dimer elevation is one of the indicators of poor prognosis in the disease. There are several studies suggesting that this value is also high in pregnant women with COVID-19, but it is difficult to distinguish as pregnancy itself also raises D-dimer [Citation21,Citation22]. In a case-control study by Hazari et al. they said that the D-dimer value increased in pregnant patients with COVID-19, but it was compared with patients with non-pregnant COVID-19 [Citation23]. In our study, pregnant women without any symptoms and pregnant women with COVID-19 were compared and it was seen that D-Dimer values ​​increased in both groups and there was no significant difference. Perhaps this value should not be used as a poor prognosis criterion in pregnant women.

There are some limitations in our study. We did not stratify patients by COVID-19 disease symptoms and extent of illness and have limited demographic data. We are of the opinion that this issue will be further clarified with new studies to be conducted with larger series and classification according to the degree of the disease.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

References

  • Devranoglu B, Yayla Abide C, Ozkaya E, et al. Coagulation tests at trigger day in patients with factor V leiden mutation to predict implantation failure. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2018;24(2):76–81. doi: 10.21613/GORM.2017.754.
  • Bremme KA. Haemostatic changes in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2003;16(2):153–168. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6926(03)00021-5.
  • Gaffney PJ. Fibrin degradation products. A review of structures found in vitro and in vivo. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;936:594–610.
  • Olson JD. D-dimer: an overview of hemostasis and fibrinolysis, assays, and clinical applications. Adv Clin Chem. 2015;69:1–46.
  • Wang M, Lu S, Li S, et al. Reference intervals of D-dimer during the pregnancy and puerperium period on the STA-R evolution coagulation analyzer. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;425:176–180. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.006.
  • Ercan Ş, Özkan S, Yücel N, et al. Establishing reference intervals for D-dimer to trimesters. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(8):983–987. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.940891.
  • Cetinkaya Demir B, Albayrak O, Aslan K. The ımpact of coronavirus disease-19 on pregnancy outcomes, A case series. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2022;29(1):30–35. doi: 10.21613/GORM.2022.1319.
  • Arachchillage DRJ, Laffan M. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(5):1233–1234. doi: 10.1111/jth.14820.
  • Thachil J, Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. D-Dimer testing: laboratory aspects and current ıssues. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1646:91–104. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7196-1_7.
  • Rostami M, Mansouritorghabeh H. D-dimer level in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020;13(11):1265–1275. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1831383.
  • Long H, Nie L, Xiang X, et al. D-Dimer and prothrombin time are the significant ındicators of severe COVID-19 and poor prognosis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6159720. doi: 10.1155/2020/6159720.
  • Gutiérrez García I, Pérez Cañadas P, Martínez Uriarte J, et al. D-dimer during pregnancy: establishing trimester-specific reference intervals. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2018;78(6):439–442. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2018.1488177.
  • Kovac M, Mikovic Z, Rakicevic L, et al. The use of D-dimer with new cutoff can be useful in diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148(1):27–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.005.
  • Duffett L, Castellucci LA, Forgie MA. Pulmonary embolism: update on management and controversies. Bmj. 2020;370:m2177. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2177.
  • Alsheef MA, Alabbad AM, Albassam RA, et al. Pregnancy and venous thromboembolism: risk factors, trends, management, and mortality. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:4071892. doi: 10.1155/2020/4071892.
  • Dado CD, Levinson AT, Bourjeily G. Pregnancy and pulmonary embolism. Clin Chest Med. 2018;39(3):525–537. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2018.04.007.
  • Connors JM, Levy JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood. 2020;135(23):2033–2040. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006000.
  • Di Renzo GC, Giardina I. Coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: consider thromboembolic disorders and thromboprophylaxis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(1):135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.017.
  • Cuker A, Tseng EK, Nieuwlaat R, et al. American society of hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19. Blood Adv. 2021;5(3):872–888. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003763.
  • Gómez-Mesa JE, Galindo-Coral S, Montes MC, et al. Thrombosis and coagulopathy in COVID-19. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(3):100742. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100742.
  • Pereira A, Cruz-Melguizo S, Adrien M, et al. Clinical course of coronavirus disease-2019 in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):839–847. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13921.
  • Shmakov RG, Prikhodko A, Polushkina E, et al. Clinical course of novel COVID-19 infection in pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;35(23):4431–4437.
  • Hazari KS, Abdeldayem R, Paulose L, et al. Covid-19 infection in pregnant women in dubai: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04130-8.