https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0464-7998
![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Objective
Systematically review the current literature for evidence on the “real-life” benefits of hearing preservation cochlear implantation (HPCI) for children and adults.
Design
Systematic search of Pubmed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and Cochrane Library for MesH terms hearing¸ preservation and cochlear implantation. Inclusion criteria were the “real-life” benefit of HPCI i.e. other than pre- and post-operative pure tone thresholds. Exclusion criteria were non-English language, conference abstracts, reviews and animal and cadaveric studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Evidence Project Tool.
Study sample
37 studies that matched criteria for review with 8/37 including children and 29/37 including adults.
Results
HPCI was associated with better speech perception in noise in 18/26 papers and better music perception in 4/5 papers. There was no significant benefit reported in speech perception in quiet (14/20 papers) or binaural cues (3/4 papers), nor was there convincing evidence of HPCI outperforming bimodal users (5/7 papers). QoL scores were high amongst HPCI patients (2/2 papers). Interpretation of findings was hindered by small study groups and significant heterogeneity in various parameters.
Conclusion
Current literature on the “real-life” benefit of HPCI, although limited, supports the existence of meaningful benefit, especially in speech perception in noise and music perception.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their input. This project was funded by Cochlear® and supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.