126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Associations between illness perceptions, word recognition, and perceived sound quality in cochlear implant users

, , , & ORCID Icon
Received 06 Aug 2022, Accepted 25 Jan 2024, Published online: 18 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

Objective

Illness perceptions refer to thoughts and ideas an individual has about an illness. The aim was to understand how cochlear implant (CI) users’ illness perceptions, in addition to their monosyllabic word recognition abilities, are associated with their self-perceived sound quality.

Design

Data were collected during routine CI check-up appointments. Participants completed the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (assessing their illness perceptions) and the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (assessing their subjective sound quality). Additionally, monosyllabic word recognition abilities were measured with the Freiburg Monosyllable Word Test. Hierarchical regression analysis were utilised to model users’ sound quality ratings. Participants’ age was entered first as a control variable. In the next step, monosyllabic word recognition was entered. Finally, participants’ illness perceptions were entered.

Study sample

Fifty-five participants with unilateral CI provision.

Results

Monosyllabic word recognition was significant in the second step. When illness perceptions and monosyllabic word recognition were both included in the third step, illness perceptions, but not monosyllabic word recognition, were significant. The model explained 22% of the variance of subjective sound quality.

Conclusions

Monosyllabic word recognition abilities and illness perceptions of CI users are important for their self-reported sound quality, but illness perceptions appear to be potentially more relevant.

Acknowledgements

Effi Katharina Lehmann performed the present work in partial fulfilment of the requirements for obtaining the degree Dr. rer. biol. hum. at the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

There was no funding for this work.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.