![Sample our Environment & Sustainability journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5935/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Environment-Sustainability.jpg"})
Abstract
The last few decades have seen the rise of Gentle soil Remediation Options (GRO), which notably include in situ contaminant stabilization (“inactivation”) and plant-based (generally termed “phytoremediation”) options. For trace element (TE)-contaminated sites, GRO aim to either decrease their labile pool and/or total content in the soil, thereby reducing related pollutant linkages. Much research has been dedicated to the screening and selection of TE-tolerant plant species and genotypes for application in GRO. However, the number of field trials demonstrating successful GRO remains well below the number of studies carried out at a greenhouse level. The move from greenhouse to field conditions requires incorporating agronomical knowledge into the remediation process and the ecological restoration of ecosystem services. This review summarizes agronomic practices against their demonstrated or potential positive effect on GRO performance, including plant selection, soil management practices, crop rotation, short rotation coppice, intercropping/row cropping, planting methods and plant densities, harvest and fertilization management, pest and weed control and irrigation management. Potentially negative effects of GRO, e.g., the introduction of potentially invasive species, are also discussed. Lessons learnt from long-term European field case sites are given for aiding the choice of appropriate management practices and plant species.
Funding
We acknowledge financial support by the European Commission within the 7th Framework program (FP7-KBBE-266124). P. Kidd would like to thank the financial support of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía e Competitividad (CTM2012-39904-C02-01) and FEDER. W. Friesl-Hanl would like to thank the Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management for funding the projects INTERLAND and NUTZRAUM which partly financed a long-term study in Austria as a basis for improving field experiences. V. Bert would like to thank ANR, VNF and ADEME for financing the BIOFILTREE and PHYTOSED Ec1 project. The Biogeco site was additionally supported by ADEME, Angers, France, the Aquitaine Region Council, Bordeaux (France), the COST Action 859 and FA905 (http://w3.gre.ac.uk/cost859/; http://www.umb.no/costaction/), the Euskampus fundazioa (www.euskampus.eu), and the ANR project Phytochem (http://www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr/projet-anr/?tx_lwmsuivibilan_pi2%5BCODE%5D=ANR-13-CDII-0005).