188
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analysis of autoantibody profiles in two asbestiform fiber exposure cohorts

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 1015-1027 | Received 08 May 2018, Accepted 13 Aug 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

An increased risk for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (SAID) was reported in the population of Libby, Montana, where extensive exposure to asbestiform amphiboles occurred through mining and use of asbestiform fiber-laden vermiculite. High frequencies of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) were detected in individuals and mice exposed to Libby Asbestiform Amphiboles (LAA). Among the 6603 individuals who have undergone health screening at the Center for Asbestos Related Diseases (CARD, Libby MT), the frequencies of rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, and systemic sclerosis are significantly higher than expected prevalence in the United States. While these data support the hypothesis that LAA can trigger autoimmune responses, evidence suggests that chrysotile asbestos does not. Serological testing was therefore performed in subjects exposed to LAA or predominantly chrysotile (New York steamfitters) using multiplexed array technologies. Analyses were performed in order to determine a) autoantibody profiles in each cohort, and b) whether the two populations could be distinguished through predictive modeling. Analysis using perMANOVA testing confirmed a significant difference between autoantibody profiles suggesting differential pathways leading to autoantibody formation. ANA were more frequent in the LAA cohort. Specific autoantibodies more highly expressed with LAA-exposure were to histone, ribosomal P protein, Sm/Ribonucleoproteins, and Jo-1 (histidyl tRNA synthetase). Myositis autoantibodies more highly expressed in the LAA cohort were Jo-1, PM100, NXP2, and Mi2a. Predictive modeling demonstrated that anti-histone antibodies were most predictive for LAA exposure, and anti-Sm was predictive for the steamfitters’ exposure. This emphasizes the need to consider fiber types when evaluating risk of SAID with asbestos exposure.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by a grant from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR/CDC), though the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY (TS000099-01); a pilot award from the NIGMS-funded Mountain West Clinical and Translational Research Infrastructure Network (GM104944) to JP; and a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS, NIH), award number P20GM103474. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Jaime Szeinuk, M.D., Occupational Medicine, Northshore University Hospital, New York, and Curtis Noonan, Ph.D., University of Montana, Missoula MT, in the interpretation of exposure data used in this work.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Fritzler is a consultant to Inova Diagnostics Inc. (San Diego, CA) and Werfen International (Barcelona, Spain) and his laboratory has received gifts in kind from Euroimmun GmbH (Luebeck, Germany). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.