Headgear safety attitudes: a national survey of collegiate women’s lacrosse stakeholders

ABSTRACT

Controversy exists among collegiate lacrosse about the use of headgear and whether its use will facilitate greater risk compensation by players and thus contribute to unsafe gameplay. We aimed to characterize the attitudes of headgear among women’s collegiate lacrosse stakeholders. A total of 190 women’s lacrosse stakeholders (players: n = 87; coaches: n = 71; officials: n = 32) participated in this study. Participants completed a survey surrounding attitudes of headgear in women’s lacrosse. Descriptives, multiple regressions, and Kruskal–Wallis analyses compared attitudes surrounding headgear among stakeholder groups. Scales of Headgear Affects Play (β = -0.38, p < 0.001) and Sports Development and Safety Practices (β = 0.26, p < 0.05) significantly predicted endorsement on Headgear Safety Attitudes Scale. Among players, Aesthetics (β = 0.51, p < 0.001) and Intention to Wear Headgear (β = 0.31, p < 0.05) predicted endorsement on Headgear Safety Attitudes Scale. Stakeholders did not agree if headgear should be worn in women’s lacrosse. Items related to sports development, safety and potential changes in gameplay predicted attitudes to headgear safety among all participants.

KEYWORDS:

• Helmets
• risk compensation
• concussion
• behaviors
• perception

Disclosure statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. Dr. Patricia M. Kelshaw acknowledges unrestricted grant funding from the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment and USA LacrosseTM.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.