Assessing the need for communication training for specialists in poison information

Abstract

Introduction. Effective communication has been shown to be essential to physician–patient communication and may be even more critical for poison control center (PCC) calls because of the absence of visual cues, the need for quick and accurate information exchange, and possible suboptimal conditions such as call surges. Professionals who answer poison control calls typically receive extensive training in toxicology but very little formal training in communication. Methods. An instrument was developed to assess the perceived need for communication training for specialists in poison information (SPIs) with input from focus groups and a panel of experts. Requests to respond to an online questionnaire were made to PCCs throughout the United States and Canada. Results. The 537 respondents were 70% SPIs or poison information providers (PIPs), primarily educated in nursing or pharmacy, working across the United States and Canada, and employed by their current centers an average of 10 years. SPIs rated communication skills as extremely important to securing positive outcomes for PCC calls even though they reported that their own training was not strongly focused on communication and existing training in communication was perceived as only moderately useful. Ratings of the usefulness of 21 specific training units were consistently high, especially for new SPIs but also for experienced SPIs. Directors rated the usefulness of training for experienced SPIs higher for 5 of the 21 challenges compared to the ratings of SPIs. Discussion. Findings support the need for communication training for SPIs and provide an empirical basis for setting priorities in developing training units.

Keywords:

• Poison control centers
• Management
• Poisoning management

Acknowledgments

A preliminary study was funded by an Interdisciplinary Seed Grant from the University of Utah. We thank our project coordinator, Kelly Teemant, for many helpful contributions to the project. This publication/presentation was supported by grant no. U4BHS08563 from the Health Resources and Services Administration's Division of Healthcare Preparedness, Poison Control Program (PCP), US Department of Health and Human Services. The contents of this publication/presentation are solely the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of HRSA/PCP.