122
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Design and optimal energy management of a stand-alone PV/WT/Diesel/battery system with EV charging facility for Thar desert camp: a case study

Pages 12070-12098 | Received 14 Feb 2023, Accepted 05 Oct 2023, Published online: 14 Oct 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Due to different financial restrictions, extending the existing power grid to remote locations like desert camps is not practically possible, forcing the camp owner to utilize expensive and ecologically hazardous diesel generators (DiG). In this regard, renewable sources based hybrid microgrid could be a viable approach toward reliable and sustainable electrification of these desert camps. However, optimum designing and proper energy management of such a system can be a challenging task. In these terms, this study presents a novel model based on the multi-objective PSO (MOPSO) algorithm for optimal design and energy management of a hybrid microgrid employing solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT), battery, and DiG for electrification of Thar desert camp in Jaisalmer, India. To address techno-eco-environmental aspects, objectives such as Dump Energy (DE), Installation and Operation Cost (IOC), and Reduction of Pollutant Emission (RPE) are considered. The optimal configuration of PV, WT, battery, and DiG are determined based on the maximization of RPE and minimization of both DE and IOC. The proposed model is formulated taking into account the seasonal load variation of a typical camp and the stochastic behavior of renewable energy sources. Moreover, electric vehicles (EVs) charging facility for the tourists staying in these camps is also included while modeling the microgrid system. Furthermore, three distinct system configurations are carefully analyzed over a 10-year period based on technical, environmental and economic indicators. The optimum configuration obtained is the hybrid PV/WT/DiG/battery system with 62 kW PV, 76 kW WT, 350 kWh battery and a 117 kW DiG. According to simulation findings, this system has an operational cost of 323.7 × 104 $ and a pollutant emission of 2034.3 tons, which is 33.67% and 63.32% less than that of the DiG-only configuration, respectively. Moreover, as compared to PV/WT/DiG system, PV/WT/DiG/battery system can reduce dump energy by 81.40%, highlighting the necessity of battery for fully utilizing renewable energy. Overall, this analysis suggests that the utilization of renewable energy sources along with the battery is the optimal planning solution for the camp owner to maximize their potential benefits. Moreover, the proposed technique can be effectively used to optimally design hybrid renewable energy system for other remote locations.

Nomenclature

Nmod=

Number of PV modules

FF=

Fill factor

V; I=

Voltage/Current of PV module.

VMPP; IMPP=

Voltage/Current at maximum power point

V0; IS=

Open circuit voltage/Short circuit current

KI; KV=

Temperature coefficient of current/voltage

TC=

PV cell Temperature

T; T0=

Ambient/Nominal operating temparature

PtPV=

Power output of PV at tth time

Psssi=

PV power at sith state of solar irradiance

Prated=

Rated power of WT

vws=

Wind Speed

vci;vr;vco=

Cut-in/rated/cutout speed

Ωp; Ωs=

Set of planning phases and seasons

Et,s,pbatt=

Battery’s SOC at tth time

=

Self discharge rate of battery

OPt,s,pPV;OPt,s,pWT;OPt,s,pDiG=

Output power of PV/WT/DiG at tth time

Pt,s,pload; Pt,s,pEV=

Camp/EV’s charging load at tth time

ηbatt,ch;ηbatt,dch=

Charging/discharging efficiency of battery

ηinv=

Inverter efficiency

Δt=

Time segment

Fuelt,s,pDiG=

Fuel cost at tth time

CappDiG=

Capacity of DiG

SOCt,s,pEV_n=

SOC of nth EV’s battery at tth time

Pt,s,pch,EV_n;Pt,s,pdch,EV_n=

Charging/discharging power of nth EV at tth time

ηch,EV_nηdch,EV_n=

EV’s battery charging/discharging efficiency

INC; OC=

Installation/operation cost

ir=

Interest rate

k=

No of years in a planning stage

IncostPV;IncostWT;IncostDiG=

Installation cost of PV/WT/DiG ($/kW)

Incostbatt=

Installation cost of battery ($/kWh)

OcostPV;OcostWT;Ocostbatt=

Operation cost of PV/WT/battery ($/kWh)

Copfuel=

Cost of fuel ($/L)

PEDiG; PEhybrid=

Pollutants emission with DiG/hybrid system

ECO2; ENO2;ECO=

Emission of pollutants (kg/kWh)

Eminbatt; Emaxbatt=

Minimum/Maximum SOC limit of battery

DoD=

Depth of discharge

Cbatt=

Capacity of battery

Et,s,pbatt,ch;Et,s,pbatt,dch=

Charging/Discharging energy of battery at tth time

CapminDiG;CapmaxDiG=

Minimum/Maximum power generation of DiG

# Subscript s denotes sth season and p indicates pth planning phase=

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Surajit Sannigrahi

Surajit Sannigrahi received the B.Tech. degree from the Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata, India, in 2012, and the M.Tech. and Ph.D. degrees from the National Institute of Technology Durgapur, Durgapur, India, in 2016 and 2020, respectively. He has more than 3 years of teaching experience. He is currently with the Electrical Engineering Department of NIT Warangal, as a Visiting Faculty (Assistant Professor). His research interests include active distribution system planning, Hybrid renewable energy system design, microgrid and smart grid.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.