29
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Like cheese and chalk or cross-fertilization? A qualitative exploration of how addiction patients perceive treatment in a general psychiatry ward

, , , , &
Received 18 Jul 2023, Accepted 13 Mar 2024, Published online: 23 Mar 2024
 

Abstract

Background

Addiction has historically been conceptualized and treated differently to other conditions. Studies suggest that healthcare staff perceive patients with substance use disorders (SUD) as a specific subgroup with distinct and challenging needs yet SUD patients frequently receive treatment in general psychiatry settings. Notwithstanding, knowledge of how SUD patients view themselves compared to other psychiatric patients and how they experience treatment in general psychiatry settings is lacking.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 SUD patients voluntarily hospitalized in the acute psychiatric unit of a general hospital to explore the lived experiences of SUD patients receiving detoxification in an acute psychiatry ward. Data were analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis.

Results

Two primary themes and five subthemes emerged: (A) Patient perceptions of the problem and its consequences’, which includes the subcategories (i) Patient views of addiction, (ii) Staff perception of the patients; and (B) Lived experiences within the specific setting with subthemes (i) Interaction with the specific setting, (ii) Interaction with fellow patients, and (iii) Perception of staff by patients.

Conclusions

Overall, SUD patients had mixed perceptions; while many appreciated aspects of their hospitalization, others faced challenges in having all their needs met. Implementing policy-level interventions, like integrating SUD patient needs into psychiatry ward design and ensuring adequate resource allocation and staff training, could improve care quality for addiction patients in general psychiatry settings.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 416.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.