Nose to brain delivery of naringin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles for potential use in oxaliplatin-induced chemobrain in rats: impact on oxidative stress, cGAS/STING and HMGB1/RAGE/TLR2/MYD88 inflammatory axes

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Oxaliplatin induces chemobrain in cancer patients/survivors. Nutraceutical naringin has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties with low oral bioavailability. Our aim was to formulate naringin in chitosan nanoparticles for nose to brain delivery and assess its neuroprotective effect against oxaliplatin-induced chemobrain in rats.

Methods

Naringin chitosan nanoparticles were prepared by ionic gelation. Rats were administered oral naringin (80 mg/kg), intranasal naringin (0.3 mg/kg) or intranasal naringin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (0.3 mg/kg). Naringin’s neuroprotective efficacy was assessed based on behavioral tests, histopathology, and measuring oxidative stress and inflammatory markers.

Results

Selected nanoparticles formulation showed drug loading of 5%, size of 150 nm and were cationic. Intranasal naringin administration enhanced memory function, inhibited hippocampal acetylcholinesterase activity, and corrected oxaliplatin-induced histological changes. Moreover, it reduced malondialdehyde and elevated reduced glutathione hippocampal levels. Furthermore, it decreased levels of inflammatory markers: NF-kB and TNF-α by 1.25-fold. Upstream to this inflammatory status, intranasal naringin downregulated the hippocampal protein levels of two pathways: cGAS/STING and HMGB1/RAGE/TLR2/MYD88.

Conclusion

Intranasal naringin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles showed superior amelioration of oxaliplatin-induced chemobrain in rats at a dose 267-fold lower to that administered orally. The potential involvement of cGAS/STING and HMGB1/RAGE/TLR2/MYD88 pathways in the mechanistic process of either oxaliplatin-induced chemobrain or naringin-mediated neuroprotection was evidenced.

KEYWORDS:

• cGAS/STING
• Chemobrain
• Chitosan nanoparticles
• Naringin
• Nose to brain delivery
• Oxaliplatin

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Ahmed Osman, Faculty of Veterinary medicine, Cairo University for his tremendous help in histological examination. Also, the authors would like to express their thankfulness to Dr. Ahmed Ibrahim Marzouk, PhD in genetics and biotechnology, Delta Scientific Consultancy Center, for his help in performing western blotting.

Author contributions

All authors contributed equally to conception and design of the study, analysis, and interpretation of the data. They all participated in writing, editing, and revising the manuscript. The final version for publication was approved by all the authors.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2023.2228685.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.