Understanding the task demands for powered wheelchair driving: a think-aloud task analysis

Abstract

Background

Powered wheelchair use promotes participation in individuals with limited mobility, however training is required for safe and effective use. There is limited evidence on the task demands of powered wheelchair use to inform an evidence-based skills training programme.

Objective

To conduct a systematic exploration of the task demands of indoor powered wheelchair use to identify frequently used skills, abilities, and knowledge.

Methods

We used a two-phased think aloud process to conduct a task analysis of powered wheelchair use with experienced powered wheelchair users (n = 5) and expert clinicians (n = 5). Participants completed seven indoor driving tasks while speaking aloud (concurrent think aloud) and subsequently engaged in a structured qualitative interview to discuss skills, abilities, and knowledge used across each of the seven tasks (retrospective think aloud). We used directed content analysis to map the skills and abilities to the ICF framework and conventional content analysis to develop thematic areas of knowledge used while operating a powered wheelchair.

Results

One-hundred and ten (110) distinct skills and abilities were identified and mapped to the ICF; 80 in the Body Structures and Functions domain, and 30 in the Activities and Participation domain. Approximately 50% of skills and abilities were mental functions. Four thematic knowledge domains were identified: knowledge of self, environment, wheelchair, and task.

Conclusion

Powered wheelchair use is complex and requires a variety of skills and abilities from all areas of human functioning, in addition to a wide range of knowledge. Training programmes should address a range of areas of skill development.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

• Powered wheelchair use is a complex skill; training should develop skills from all.

• Domains of the ICF, including mental and physical functions.

• A range of knowledge is used while operating a powered wheelchair; training programs.

• Should include the development and application of necessary knowledge.

• Clinicians may consider a range of factors when assessing suitability for powered.

• Wheelchair user, however should acknowledge that while the range of skills idenotified.

• May be useful, they may not be critical for success in powered wheelchair use.

Keywords:

• Powered wheelchair
• self-help devices
• wheelchairs
• task analysis
• cognition

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The present research was financially supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, AGEWELL Network of Centres of Excellence.