Correction

This article refers to:

Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs

Levin J. R., Ferron, J. M., & Gafurov, B. S. (2017). Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(5), pp. 290-311.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2018.1489485

When the above article was first published online, there was a misalignment problem in Table 6 in the second sub-table. The correct table has been reproduced below.

Table 6. Design, data, and modified-extended Revusky partial calculations for the classroom intervention example.

	O1	O2	O3	O4	O5	O6	O7	O8	O9	O10
Classroom 1	4	3	│ 5	7	6	8	7	8	9	7
Classroom 2	6	7	5	6	6	│ 7	10	9	10	10
Classroom 3	9	9	7	10	10	8	9	│12	11	14
	Step 1 (Based on O2)			Step 1 (Based on O3)^#
Mean	A = O1	B = O2:O4	B-A	A = O1:O2	B = O3:O4	B-A
Classroom 1*	4.000	5.000	1.000	3.500	6.000	2.500
Classroom 2	6.000	6.000	0.000	6.500	5.500	-1.000
Classroom 3	9.000	8.667	-0.333	9.000	8.500	-0.500
	Step 2 (Based on O5)			Step 2 (Based on O6)^#
Mean	A = O1:O4	B = O5:O7	B-A	A = O1:O5	B = O6:O7	B-A
Classroom 2*	6.000	7.667	1.667	6.000	8.500	2.500
Classroom 3	8.750	9.000	0.250	9.000	8.500	-0.500
	Step 3 (Based on O8)^#			Step 3 (Based on O9)
Mean	A = O1:O7	B = O8:O10	B-A	A= O1:O8	B = O9:O10	B-A
Classroom 3*	8.857	12.333	3.476	9.250	12.500	3.250

Note. The bolded values in the table represent the two-alternative intervention start-point interval that was specified for each classroom. │indicates the actual intervention start point for each classroom. * indicates the classroom that was actually intervened with on each step and # indicates the actual intervention point for that classroom.