38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effectiveness of Power Exercises Compared to Traditional Strength Exercises on Motor Skills, Muscle Performance and Functional Muscle Strength of Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

, , , & ORCID Icon
Received 02 Jan 2023, Accepted 16 Apr 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the impact of 8-weeks of power exercises compared to traditional strength exercises on motor abilities, muscle performance, and functional strength in children with ADHD. A total of 34 children with ADHD were randomized into two groups to receive functional power training (n = 17, M age: 121.2 ± 16.6 months) and traditional strength training (n = 17, M age: 116.1 ± 13.4 months). After the 8-week intervention, two-way ANOVA results with 95% confidence intervals showed no differences between the groups in motor skills, muscle power, or functional muscle strength. However, the functional power training group had larger effect sizes and greater increases in total motor composite score (10% vs 7%), body coordination (13.8% vs 4.9%) and bilateral coordination (38.8% vs 27.9%) than the traditional strength training group. The power training group also exhibited catch-up growth with typically developing peers. These findings suggest that power exercises may be more effective than strength exercises for rapid force generation in daily life, particularly for children with ADHD.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Author Contributions

Elif Nur Tascioglu: Writing- Original draft preparation, Data curation, Software, Visualization, Investigation, Selcen Karademir: Data curation, Software, Visualization, Investigation, Koray Kara: Planning the study, Supervision, Reviewing and Editing, Hasan Atacan Tonak: Visualization, Investigation, Ozgun Kaya Kara: Writing- Original draft preparation, Planning the study, Conceptualization, Methodology.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2024.2345335

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 263.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.