1,547
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Speech-driven mobile games for speech therapy: User experiences and feasibility

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 644-658 | Received 16 May 2017, Accepted 28 Jun 2018, Published online: 09 Oct 2018
 

Abstract

Purpose: To assist in remote treatment, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rely on mobile games, which though entertaining, lack feedback mechanisms. Games integrated with automatic speech recognition (ASR) offer a solution where speech productions control gameplay. We therefore performed a feasibility study to assess children’s and SLPs’ experiences towards speech-controlled games, game feature preferences and ASR accuracy.

Method: Ten children with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS), six typically developing (TD) children and seven SLPs trialled five games and answered questionnaires. Researchers also compared the results of ASR to perceptual judgment.

Result: Children and SLPs found speech-controlled games interesting and fun, despite ASR–human disagreements. They preferred games with rewards, challenge and multiple difficulty levels. Automatic speech recognition–human agreement was higher for SLPs than children, similar between TD and CAS and unaffected by CAS severity (77% TD, 75% CAS – incorrect; 51% TD, 47% CAS, 71% SLP – correct). Manual stop recording yielded higher agreement than automatic. Word length did not influence agreement.

Conclusion: Children’s and SLPs’ positive responses towards speech-controlled games suggest that they can engage children in higher intensity practice. Our findings can guide future improvements to the ASR, recording methods and game features to improve the user experience and therapy adherence.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material available online

Additional information

Funding

This work was made possible by NPRP grant #[8-293-2-124] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation). Ballard was supported by Australian Research Council Future Fellowship FT120100355. The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 294.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.