Correlation between standard sperm parameters and sperm DNA fragmentation from 11,339 samples

Abstract

Conventional semen parameters have long been considered fundamental in male fertility analyses. However, doubts have been raised regarding the clinical utility of the assessment of spermatozoa (sperm) DNA damage. In this retrospective study, we investigated the potential correlation between conventional semen parameters and semen DNA fragmentation (SDF) assessed as sperm DNA damage, in 11,339 semen samples collected between January 2019 and June 2022. We observed significant negative correlations between the DNA fragmentation index (DFI) and sperm viability (correlation coefficient [r] = −0.514) as well as progressive sperm motility (r = −0.512, p < 0.05). Samples were categorized into three groups according to DFI levels (Groups A, B, and C: ≤15%, 15 < DFI ≤30%, and >30%, respectively). Furthermore, the percentage of semen samples with normal sperm conventional parameters in Groups A, B, and C was 76.7% (4369/5697), 61.4% (2351/3827), and 39.7% (721/1815), respectively. Moreover, according to the reference values of conventional sperm parameters, the samples were divided into Groups F, G, and H with all normal, only one abnormal, and > two abnormal parameters, respectively. In addition, the proportions of samples with abnormal DFI values (>30) in Groups F, G, and H were 9.7% (721/7441), 23.1% (618/2676), and 39.0% (476/1222), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression models demonstrated that sperm vitality, progressive sperm motility, normal sperm form, total sperm count, semen volume, age, and some sperm kinematics collectively improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) to 0.861, surpassing the predictive value of a single predictor of pathologically damaged sperm DNA. Our study suggests that samples with abnormal sperm parameters may have a higher likelihood of high DNA fragmentation. Furthermore, certain semen parameters could be potential indicators of sperm DNA fragmentation, aiding sperm selection in assisted reproductive procedures.

Keywords:

• Infertility
• male
• semen analysis
• sperm

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Review Board of West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (WCSUH-SCU IRB 2020-001).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Authors’ contributions

Study conception and writing of the original draft: TTY; Data curation: LY, JYX, LJY, YLJ and YZ; Conception and design; BZ and FPL. All authors reviewed, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program under [Grant 2022YFS0045 and 2023NSFSC1609].