Public opinion in Japan and the UK on issues of fairness and integrity in sport: implications for anti-doping policy

ABSTRACT

The continuing challenge of achieving compliance with the World Anti-Doping Code had led WADA to place an increasing emphasis on strengthening anti-doping values. Education was given a much higher and clearer profile in the 2015 iteration of the Code and in 2017 WADA established a working group to prepare an International Standard to prioritise values-based education. The aims of this paper are to explore the utility of the ‘spirit of sport’ as a global moral reference point, to assess the significance of cultural values for successful Code compliance and to contribute to the development of values-based education programmes. The research is based on two large-scale surveys of public opinion in Japan and the United Kingdom. The analysis of the data indicated that the general public assess the nature of an action in terms of their own experience and in terms of what is normal in their daily lives rather than in a narrow sporting context. Differences were evident not only between the two countries, but also between genders and age groups within the countries. The challenge for WADA is to appreciate the need to take careful account of the variety of moral reference points found in societies. While the Code is a universal set of regulations the way in which it should be promoted needs to be aligned with the particularities of cultural contexts.

KEYWORDS:

• World Anti-Doping Code
• values education
• Japan
• United Kingdom
• International Standard for Education

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Quotes are from notes made by one of the authors who attended the conference held in Oslo on 25 June 2018.

2. All these countries were early signatories of the Council of Europe Anti-Doping Convention, are prominent within WADA (as personnel or host country) and have NADOs that have been consistently (and reasonably well) funded by their governments.

3. In this section, the term ‘unfair’ refers to the aggregation of ‘very unfair’ and ‘unfair’ responses. Similarly the term ‘fair’ is an aggregation of ‘very fair’ and ‘fair’ responses.

Additional information

Funding

The research on which this article is based was commissioned by the Japan Sport Agency, Government of Japan, in collaboration with the Japan Anti-Doping Agency as part of the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic legacy project. The authors are grateful to the Japan Sport Agency for permission to use the data collected by the Mitsubishi Research Institute and YouGov.