2,503
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Assembly of novel microbial genomes from gut metagenomes of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2188848 | Received 17 Aug 2022, Accepted 03 Mar 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

ABSTRACT

Rhesus macaque (RM, Macaca mulatta), as an important model animal, commonly suffers from chronic diarrheal disease, challenging the breeding of RMs. Gut microbiomes play key roles in maintaining intestinal health of RMs. However, it is still unclear about more features of gut microbiome as responsible for intestinal health of RMs. In this study, we performed de novo assembly of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) based on fecal metagenomes from chronic diarrheal RMs and asymptomatic individuals. In total of 731 non-redundant MAGs with at least 80% completeness were reconstructed in this study. More than 97% MAGs were novel genomes compared with more than 250,000 reference genomes. MAGs of Campylobacter and Helicobacteraceae from RM guts mainly carried flagella-associated virulence genes and chemotaxis-associated virulence genes, which might mediate motility and adhesion of bacteria. Comparing to MAGs of Campylobacter from humans, distributions and functions of these MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs exhibited significant differences. Most members of Bacteroidota, Spirochaetota, Helicobacteraceae, Lactobacillaceae and Anaerovibrio significantly decreased in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs. More than 92% MAGs in this study were not contained in 2,985 MAGs previously reported from other 22 non-human primates (NHPs), expanding the microbial diversity in guts of NHPs. The distributions and functions of gut microbiome were prominently influenced by host phylogeny of NHPs. Our results could help to more clearly understand about the diversity and function of RMs gut microbiome.

Introduction

Due to many populations and the similarity of genetic evolution to human, rhesus macaque (RM, Macaca mulatta) generally serves as an important model animal to reveal physiology of human, research clinical disease and develop new drugs.Citation1–3 Therefore, RMs with huge needs are widely raised in captivity as model animal. However, many captive RMs usually suffer from chronic diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality to pose serious challenges in breeding and management of RMs.Citation4 Chronic diarrhea of RMs is prominently manifested by long-term and recurrent diarrhea.Citation5 Previous studies indicated that chronic diarrhea disease of RMs was accompanied by significant changes of gut microbial composition and metabolic function.Citation6,Citation7 The significant decrease of carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) genes and significant increase of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were found in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs comparing with asymptomatic RMs.Citation7 However, these changes of microbial abundance and diversity might not mean that emergence and continuation of diarrhea disease are caused by the increased/decreased microbiome. In addition, taxonomic annotation of gut microbiome based on metagenomic short reads might lose many important microbial taxa due to databases or algorithms.Citation6 The abundance changes of different genes are also difficultly located to concrete microbial species. It is still unclear about more features of gut microbiome as responsible for chronic diarrhea of RMs. Therefore, functional exploration of gut microbiome at genome level is necessary to better understand the important roles of gut microbiome in RMs.

Although some isolates were obtained from guts of RMs in several previous studies,Citation7,Citation8 the number of these isolates was negligible in guts of RMs with innumerable microorganisms. For now, bacterial genomes were mainly obtained by conventional culture in laboratory. However, the culture of gut microorganisms in artificial culture medium is still difficult, although many microorganisms have been indiscriminately cultured and were obtained draft genomes.Citation9–12 Metagenomic binning is an effective method for reconstruction of genomes from rare community members. The metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), the microbial draft genomes assembled from metagenomic reads, have been largely reconstructed from gastrointestinal tracts of animals, such as cow rumen,Citation13 chicken cecum,Citation14 murine gut.Citation15 These MAGs from gastrointestinal tracts of animals vastly promoted the understanding about diversity and function of microbiome. In addition, metagenomic assembly could obtain a mass of novel draft genomes.Citation16 These novel MAGs have expanded the life tree to further enlarge the understanding of unknown microorganisms’ characteristics and functions, in particular non-culturable species.Citation17

Manara et al.Citation18 reconstructed 2,985 MAGs from 22 non-human primate (NHP) species. These MAGs immensely expanded the understanding of diversity and function for NHP gut microbiome, but didn’t involve in MAGs from RMs. The gut microbial composition and diversity, in particular specific microbial taxa, could be partly influenced by host phylogeny.Citation19,Citation20 The host specificity of NHPs could reportedly shape the different gut microbial composition.Citation21–23 Heritable difference of gut microbiome at genome level might stochastically evolve in adapting of diverse gut environment.Citation24,Citation25 These differences of gut microbiome might be presented not only by gut microbial composition but also by genome variation. Therefore, these gut microbial genomes from NHPs could enhance the understanding of host-microbiome coevolution.

In this study, we sought to reconstruct MAGs of RMs (including asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs) based on fecal metagenomic reads to explore the diversity and function of gut microbiome at genome level. We finally obtained 731 non-redundant MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs, including many novel strains and novel species comparing with reference genomes, which further expanded genomes sets of NHPs’ gut microbiome. Therefore, our results might help to more clearly understand about the gut microbiome of RMs, in particular chronic diarrhea individuals, more importantly, and provide new insights in prevention for diarrhea of RMs.

Results

Reconstruction of 731 MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs

Metagenomic binning of 29 fecal metagenomes of RMs (including 11 chronic diarrhea RMs and 18 asymptomatic RMs) from our previous studyCitation7 were performed. After preliminarily completed metagenomic binning, we obtained 7,082 raw bins from fecal metagenomes of RMs. After removing redundant bins with ANI>99% between genomes, we further obtained 731 non-redundant MAGs with estimated completeness>80% and estimated contamination<10%, 93 MAGs of which were from co-assembly binning and 638 MAGs from single-sample binning. Of these MAGs, 354 MAGs had completeness>90% and contamination<5% (defined as high-quality draft genomesCitation26), 145 MAGs had completeness>95% and contamination<5%, and 24 MAGs had completeness>97% and none contamination (Supplementary Figure S1a and Supplementary Table S1).

Taxonomic labels of all MAGs were identified to class level at least. All 731 MAGs were identified to 2 kingdoms, 16 phyla and 22 classes, 730 MAGs to 46 orders, 728 MAGs to 80 families, 698 MAGs to 219 genera and 464 MAGs to 250 species ( and Supplementary Table S2). The phylogenetic tree of the 731 MAGs were constructed based on more than 400 most conserved proteins from microbial genomes (). The taxonomic labels of these MAGs at phylum level were consistent with the phylogenetic tree. Of these MAGs, 724 MAGs and 7 MAGs were classified to 14 bacterial phyla and 2 archaeal phyla, respectively. Most MAGs belonged to Firmicutes_A (n = 312), followed by Bacteroidota (NCBI taxonomy: Bacteroidetes, n = 152), Firmicutes (n = 87), Spirochaetota (NCBI taxonomy: Spirochetes, n = 44), Proteobacteria (n = 38), Firmicutes_C (n = 33) and Campylobacterota (NCBI taxonomy: Epsilonproteobacteria, n = 26) (). MAGs of Spirochaetota (23/26) and Campylobacterota (40/44) were mainly from asymptomatic RMs. Seven MAGs of archaea consisted of 4 MAGs of Thermoplasmatota and 3 MAGs of Methanobacteriota.

Figure 1. The taxonomic labels of MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs. (a) the phylogenetic tree of 731 MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs. (b) the number of 731 MAGs at different phyla. (c) the number of SGBs at order level.

Figure 1. The taxonomic labels of MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs. (a) the phylogenetic tree of 731 MAGs from fecal metagenomes of RMs. (b) the number of 731 MAGs at different phyla. (c) the number of SGBs at order level.

Table 1. The taxonomic classification of MAGs in different levels.

The members of Firmicutes_A belonged to the class Clostridia (n = 276) and Clostridia_A (n = 36) (Supplementary Figure S1b). The members of Clostridia included the order Oscillospirales (n = 143), Lachnospirales (n = 115), Peptostreptococcales (n = 13), Clostridiales (n = 2), UMGS1883 (n = 2) and Monoglobales_A (n = 1). The members of Clostridia_A included the order Christensenellales (n = 35) and one undefined order. All members of Bacteroidota belonged to the class Bacteroidia, including the order Bacteroidales (n = 150), Flavobacteriales (n = 1) and Chitinophagales (n = 1). All members of Firmicutes belonged to the class Bacilli, including the order RF39 (n = 28), Erysipelotrichales (n = 24), Lactobacillales (n = 21), RFN20 (n = 10), Acholeplasmatales (n = 2), Bacillales (n = 1) and Staphylococcales (n = 1).

Comparing with reference genomes of GTDB, 712 MAGs (97.4%) had ANI<99%. Supplementary Table S3 showed average identity and proportion of assigned proteins of MAGs aligned to UniProt TrEMBL database by MAGpy. Of these MAGs not classified to species level, 250 MAGs (34.2%) had average identity of amino acid<95% and proportion of assigned proteins<90%, defined as potential novel species. These potential novel species belonged to 19 classes of 15 phyla, mainly included 93 MAGs of class Clostridia, 30 MAGs of class Bacilli, 29 MAGs of class Bacteroidia, 24 MAGs of class Spirochaetia, 19 MAGs of class Campylobacteria and 11 MAGs of class Clostridia_A (Supplementary Figure S1b). Of these MAGs not classified to genus level, 32 MAGs had average identity of amino acid<90% and proportion of assigned proteins<90% assigned by MAGpy, mainly including 12 MAGs of Clostridia, 8 MAGs of Campylobacteria, 4 MAGs of Bacilli and 3 MAGs of Clostridia_A.

All bins were also clustered at threshold of 95% ANI to obtain 464 species-level genomes bins (SGBs). Therefore, these SGBs represented taxa of the 731 MAGs at species level. These SGBs mainly belonged to the order Oscillospirales (n = 104), Lachnospirales (n = 76), Bacteroidales (n = 65), Christensenellales (n = 28) and RF39 (n = 26) (). 103 SGBs had more than one MAG, whilst 361 SGBs only had one MAG. The SGB named as SGB_116 (classified as UBA636 sp900546285) had most MAGs (n = 17), followed by SGB_73 (RC9 sp900546445, n = 15), SGB_391 (Anaerovibrio sp900548165, n = 12) and SGB_29 (Prevotella sp900548195, n = 10).

The functional characterization of 731 MAGs

To further compare the functional features, we predicted and annotated the genes of these MAGs. Contigs’ numbers in these 731 MAGs ranged from 3 to 375 (Supplementary Figure S2a and Supplementary Table S1). Total length of MAGs’ contigs ranged from 745,063bp to 4,276,366bp with average length of contigs from 5219.6bp to 498,8330bp. Numbers of predicted genes in MAGs ranged from 720 to 4,080, 88.1% of which ranged from 1,300bp to 2,700bp. rRNA genes of most MAGs cannot be identified, while 5S rRNA genes of 393 MAGs, 16S rRNA genes of 115 MAGs and 23S rRNA genes of 60 MAGs were identified from genome sequences. 47 MAGs included full-length 16S rRNA genes, while 68 MAGs only carried fragment of 16S rRNA genes.

After completed prediction of genes, 1,384,640 genes were contained in 731 MAGs in total. We put together all genes of 731 MAGs to construct non-redundant gene sets at 99%, 95% and 90% identity, producing 1,028,834, 892,970, 835,294 clusters, respectively. The non-redundant gene set at 95% identity were further annotated at protein levels. 841,916 (94.3%) genes were mapped to UniProt TrEMBL database with average identity of 77.0%, whilst 51,054 (5.7%) genes cannot be annotated to UniProt TrEMBL database. In addition, 823,700 (92.2%) genes, 820,072 (91.8%) genes, 764,549 (85.6%) genes, 609 (0.068%) genes and 29,648 (3.3%) genes could be assigned to UniRef90, UniRef50, eggNOG, CARD and CAZy database, respectively.

We predicted CAZymes genes in genome of each MAG. Total 46,057 CAZymes genes were identified from all MAGs. Verrucomicrobiota, Fibrobacterota, Bacteroidota and Firmicutes_A carried most abundant CAZymes genes, and had high percentage of CAZymes genes in genomes (Supplementary Figure S2b). Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) were enriched in the family Bacteroidaceae, UBA932, Lachnospiraceae, Acutalibacteraceae, Ruminococcaceae and UBA1067 (). Glycosyltransferases (GTs) were prevalent in all MAGs. Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs) mainly harbored in the family Bacteroidaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. Carbohydrate esterases (CEs) mainly harbored in the phylum Bacteroidota and Firmicutes_A. Polysaccharide lyases (PLs) mainly harbored in the phylum Bacteroidota. Auxiliary activities (AAs) and S-layer homologies (SLHs) were scarce in most MAGs.

Figure 2. The distribution of CAZymes and virulence genes in MAGs. (a) the distribution of CAZymes genes in MAGs; Glycosyltransferases (GTs); Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs); Carbohydrate esterases (CEs); Polysaccharide lyases (PLs); Auxiliary activities (AAs); S-layer homologies (SLHs). (b) the distribution of virulence genes in MAGs.

Figure 2. The distribution of CAZymes and virulence genes in MAGs. (a) the distribution of CAZymes genes in MAGs; Glycosyltransferases (GTs); Carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs); Carbohydrate esterases (CEs); Polysaccharide lyases (PLs); Auxiliary activities (AAs); S-layer homologies (SLHs). (b) the distribution of virulence genes in MAGs.

We predicted ARGs in genome of each MAG based on CARD database. Total 1,004 ARGs were obtained from 574 MAGs with average identity of 62.2%. Trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase dfr was most abundant ARG family (n = 474), followed by resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) antibiotic efflux pump (n = 125), major facilitator superfamily (MFS) antibiotic efflux pump (n = 67), APH(6) (n = 43) and ABC-F ATP-binding cassette ribosomal protection protein (n = 28) (Supplementary Table S4). Notably, MAGs of Escherichia carried most ARGs. Two MAGs of Escherichia flexneri carried 53 (1.3%) and 49 ARGs (1.3%), respectively, and one MAG of Escherichia albertii carried 39 ARGs (1.1%).

The virulence-associated genes in genome of each MAG were predicted based on VFDB database. Total 289 virulence genes were identified in MAGs. Notably, the MAGs of Campylobacteraceae, Helicobacteraceae, Escherichia, Haemophilus and Haemophilus_A enriched many virulence-associated genes ().

The genomes of Campylobacter and Helicobacteraceae

Previous studies reported that Campylobacter infection, in particular C. coli and C. jejuni, was associated with diarrhea of RMs.Citation8,Citation27,Citation28 In this study, we reconstructed 11 MAGs of Campylobacter not assigned to any species level (classified to 2 SGBs, 4 from SGB_80 and 7 from SGB_81). Four MAGs (all belonging to SGB_80) were significantly more abundant in guts of asymptomatic RMs than those in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs (p < 0.05), while other 7 MAGs (all belonging to SGB_81) were more abundant in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs, 3 MAGs of which were significantly more abundant (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S5).

Manara et al.Citation18 also reconstructed 3 MAGs of Campylobacter from other NHPs. To identify genetic relationship of the 14 MAGs of Campylobacter, we downloaded 37 reference genomes of Campylobacter from NCBI, and constructed a phylogenetic tree of these genomes (Supplementary Figure S3a). The 11 MAGs of RM and one MAGs of Macaca fascicularis were clustered to 2 clades corresponding with taxonomic labels of SGBs. And they were more closely related to C. hyointestinalis, C. fetus and C. iguaniorum, but were distant to C. coli and C. jejuni.

We annotated virulence genes in 14 MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs and other NHPs, and reference genomes of C. coli, C. jejuni, C. fetus, C. hyointestinalis, C. iguaniorum and C. lanienae. A total of 133 virulence genes were identified in these genomes (). C. jejuni, C. coli and one MAG of other NHPs harbored most virulence genes, but majority of virulence genes were not detected in other MAGs and other reference genomes. Most MAGs carried flaA or flaB gene, as the major flagellin genes. The virulence genes of RM’s MAGs were enriched in flagella-associated genes, such as fliI, fliG, fliP, fliN and fliM. In addition, chemotaxis-associated genes, such as cheV3, cheA and cheY, were also detected in these MAGs.

Figure 3. The genomes of Campylobacter and Helicobacteraceae. (a) the annotation of virulence genes in genomes of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and 6 reference genomes. (b) the phylogenetic tree of MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and humans with different diets. (c) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and humans based on different sites of sampling. (d) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Campylobacter from feces based on different hosts including RMs, other NHPs and humans with different diets. (e) the annotation of virulence genes in genomes of Helicobacteraceae from RMs and other NHPs.

Figure 3. The genomes of Campylobacter and Helicobacteraceae. (a) the annotation of virulence genes in genomes of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and 6 reference genomes. (b) the phylogenetic tree of MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and humans with different diets. (c) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs, other NHPs and humans based on different sites of sampling. (d) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Campylobacter from feces based on different hosts including RMs, other NHPs and humans with different diets. (e) the annotation of virulence genes in genomes of Helicobacteraceae from RMs and other NHPs.

To further compare differences of Campylobacter genomes between NHPs and humans, 301 Campylobacter MAGs from humans were obtained from previous study.Citation29 These human MAGs were mainly from oral cavities and guts of humans with westernized diet, whilst only 9 MAGs were from oral cavities and guts of humans with non-westernized diet. We constructed a phylogenetic tree of these Campylobacter genomes (). All MAGs from RMs and one MAGs from Macaca fascicularis were clustered in an independent clade, and 2 other NHP MAGs were close to them. They were significantly different from MAGs of humans in phylogenetic tree. We also functionally annotated genes of these MAGs based on UniRef50 database. NDMS plot exhibited that these MAGs at functional level were obviously separated based on sampling sites, mainly oral cavity and gut (). We further compared functional differences of all MAGs from guts. NDMS plot exhibited that MAGs from RMs at functional level were significantly separated with MAGs from humans ().

Helicobacter may be an important factor in development of chronic diarrhea of RMs.Citation28,Citation30 However, Helicobacter was commonly also prevalent in guts of asymptomatic RMs and significantly decreased in guts of diarrheal RMs.Citation6,Citation27 In this study, we retrieved 15 MAGs of Helicobacteraceae, 6 of which belonged to Helicobacter_B, 1 to Helicobacter_C and 8 not assigned to genus level. All MAGs were recovered from fecal metagenomes of asymptomatic RMs. These MAG of Helicobacteraceae were scarcely detected in fecal metagenomes of chronic diarrhea RMs (only 1 MAG was detected), but were prevalent in fecal metagenomes of asymptomatic RMs.

In addition, 20 MAGs of Helicobacteraceae were also retrieved from metagenomes of other NHPs,Citation18 including 12 of which belonged to Helicobacter_B, 2 to Helicobacter_C and 6 not assigned to genus level. Of these 20 MAGs, 15 MAGs of Helicobacteraceae were recovered from fecal metagenomes of Macaca fascicularis. We downloaded 44 reference genomes of Helicobacter from NCBI, and constructed a phylogenetic tree of them and MAGs of Helicobacteraceae from RMs and other NHPs (Supplementary Figure S3b). These MAGs were mainly placed in 2 clusters. All 18 MAGs assigned to Helicobacter_B were most closely related to Helicobacter macacae. 6 MAGs from RMs and one MAG from Macaca fascicularis were clustered with reference genome of Helicobacter macacae. Notably, 16 of these 18 MAGs were retrieved from RM and Macaca fascicularis. Most of MAGs not assigned to genus level were closely related to Helicobacter winghamensis and Helicobacter pullorum. Only five MAGs of Helicobacteraceae were obtained from metagenomes of humans,Citation29 as could suggest that the species of Helicobacteraceae seemed to be rare in human guts comparing with NHPs’ guts.

We also annotated the virulence genes in all MAGs of Helicobacteraceae (). flaA or flaB genes were detected in most MAGs. Similarly, virulence genes of these MAGs were enriched in flagella-associated genes, such as fliS, flgG, flgC, flaB, fliG, fliP and fliQ, and chemotaxis-associated genes, such as cheY, cheA and cheV1.

Abundances of MAGs in fecal metagenomes of RMs

To compare compositional differences of gut microbiome between asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs, we quantified and compared abundances of the 731 MAGs in fecal metagenomes of RMs. The α-diversity of these MAGs including Shannon index and Simpson indexes were significantly higher in guts of asymptomatic RMs than chronic diarrhea RMs (). Based on Bray-Curtis distance of abundances of MAGs in fecal metagenomes of RMs, PCoA plot exhibited that samples of chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs were significantly divided (). The abundances of all MAGs in the fecal metagenomes of RMs exhibited that samples of chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs were clearly divided in heatmap (). The abundances of 425 MAGs in fecal metagenomes of chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs exhibited significant different (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S5). Most members of the phylum Bacteroidota (such as these families UBA932, Paludibacteraceae, Tannerellaceae and P3, as well as some members of Bacteroidaceae), most members of the family Helicobacteraceae, most members of the family Lactobacillaceae (such as Lactobacillus, Ligilactobacillus and Limosilactobacillus), most members of the family Selenomonadaceae (Anaerovibrio) and most members of the phylum Spirochaetota (such as Brachyspira and Treponema_D) were significantly more abundant in guts of asymptomatic RMs than those in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs. Most obviously, several taxa of these MAGs, such as Helicobacteraceae, Anaerovibrio of Selenomonadaceae and Brachyspira of Brachyspiraceae, were hardly detected in fecal metagenomes of chronic diarrhea RMs, but were prevalent in fecal metagenomes of asymptomatic RMs.

Figure 4. The abundance comparison of MAGs in fecal metagenomes of chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs. (a) the alpha-diversity (Simpson index and Shannon index) of 731 MAGs in guts of asymptomatic and chronic diarrhea RMs. (b) PCoA plot based on Bray-Curtis distance of abundance of 731 MAGs in guts of asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs. (c) heatmap of the abundance of 731 MAGs in fecal metagenomes of asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs.

Figure 4. The abundance comparison of MAGs in fecal metagenomes of chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs. (a) the alpha-diversity (Simpson index and Shannon index) of 731 MAGs in guts of asymptomatic and chronic diarrhea RMs. (b) PCoA plot based on Bray-Curtis distance of abundance of 731 MAGs in guts of asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs. (c) heatmap of the abundance of 731 MAGs in fecal metagenomes of asymptomatic RMs and chronic diarrhea RMs.

Comparison of MAGs between RMs and other NHPs

Manara et al.Citation18 had retrieved 2,985 MAGs from 22 NHP species but not including RM. To assess uniqueness of MAGs from RMs comparing with MAGs from other NHPs, ANIs were calculated between the 731 MAGs of RMs and the 2,985 MAGs of other NHPs. 678 MAGs (92.7%) of RMs had ANI<99% as threshold for same strains, whilst 354 MAGs (48.4%) of RMs had ANI<95% as threshold for same species (). Therefore, these 678 MAGs of RMs represented different strains compared with MAGs of other NHPs, and 354 MAGs of RMs belonged to unique species not found in guts of other NHPs. Of these MAGs of other NHPs, MAGs of Cercopithecoidea, in particular Macaca fascicularis, had higher ANIs than Lemuriformes and Platyrrhini (). A total of 108 MAGs of other NHPs, all of which were from Macaca fascicularis, had ANI>99% comparing with MAGs of RMs. And 608 MAGs of other NHPs, 565 MAGs (92.9%) of which were from Macaca fascicularis, had ANI>95% comparing with MAGs of RMs.

Figure 5. The comparison of MAGs between RMs and other NHPs. (a) the ANI of MAGs of RMs comparing with MAGs of other NHPs. The green dot is the most matching ANI of each MAGs. The red line is 95% ANI threshold, and the orange line is 99% ANI threshold. (b) the ANI distribution of MAGs of other NHPs comparing with MAGs of RMs. (c) the number of MAGs from RMs that were non-redundant compared with MAGs of other NHPs. (d) the phylogenetic tree of Prevotella from NHPs. (e) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Prevotella from NHPs, based on clades of NHPs.

Figure 5. The comparison of MAGs between RMs and other NHPs. (a) the ANI of MAGs of RMs comparing with MAGs of other NHPs. The green dot is the most matching ANI of each MAGs. The red line is 95% ANI threshold, and the orange line is 99% ANI threshold. (b) the ANI distribution of MAGs of other NHPs comparing with MAGs of RMs. (c) the number of MAGs from RMs that were non-redundant compared with MAGs of other NHPs. (d) the phylogenetic tree of Prevotella from NHPs. (e) Ordination on functional annotations of MAGs of Prevotella from NHPs, based on clades of NHPs.

To further identify unique species-level genomes in RM guts, ANIs were calculated between SGBs of RMs and other NHPs MAG. About 60% SGBs (n = 286) had ANI<95% comparing with other NHP MAGs. Therefore, these 286 SGBs represented unique species in RM guts. These unique species mainly belonged to these orders, including Oscillospirales (n = 56), Lachnospirales (n = 53), Bacteroidales (n = 32), RF39 (n = 23), Christensenellales (n = 18), Treponematales (n = 12) and Campylobacterales (n = 10) ().

We re-identified the taxonomic labels of 2,985 MAGs of other NHPs using GTDB-Tk. Of these genera of other NHP MAGs, the genus Prevotella had most MAGs (n = 301). In addition, 36 MAGs of Prevotella were recovered from fecal metagenomes of RMs. To compare the influence by host phylogeny, we constructed a phylogenetic tree of the 337 Prevotella MAGs, which were from 19 species of 4 NHPs’ clades (including Platyrrhini, Cercopithecoidea, Lemuriformes and apes) (). These Prevotella MAGs mainly were from guts of Platyrrhini and Cercopithecidae. Most MAGs of RMs and Macaca fascicularis had shared clades of phylogenetic tree, whilst most MAGs of Papio cynocephalus had unshared clades of phylogenetic tree. And MAGs of Platyrrhini also had unshared clades of phylogenetic tree. Based on functional annotation of Uniref50 database, NDMS plot exhibited that these MAGs were separated based on clades of NHPs (). The MAGs from Lemuriformes, Platyrrhini and Cercopithecidae were clearly separated in NDMS plot.

Discussion

The microbial genomes can provide a better insight to explore the function of gut microbiome in metabolism, nutrition and disease of host. Several studiesCitation6,Citation31–34 revealed the gut microbial composition of RMs, but it is necessary to develop a deeper understanding of RMs’ gut microbiome at genomes level, especially chronic diarrhea individuals. The reconstruction of microbial genomes based on metagenomic sequences greatly expands the number and diversity of microbial genomes, in particular uncultivable strains.Citation26 Although Manara et al.Citation18 retrieved 2,985 MAGs from 22 NHPs, none MAG from RMs was obtained due to lack of RMs’ metagenomes. Therefore, in this study, we reconstructed total 731 MAGs from 29 RMs’ fecal metagenomes and further expanded the number and diversity of microbial genomes from NHPs. About 80% MAGs in the study belonged to these phyla Firmicutes_A, Bacteroidota, Firmicutes and Firmicutes_C. These phyla Firmicutes_A, Firmicutes and Firmicutes_C belonged to the phylum Firmicutes in NCBI taxonomy. The taxonomic distribution of these reconstructed MAGs accorded with the abundance of microbial composition in RMs’ gut according to previous studies based on metagenomic sequencingCitation6,Citation7 or 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.Citation31–34 It also indicated that genomes of high-abundance microbes had a higher recovery ratio based on metagenomes assembly. For low-abundance microbes, co-assembly is an effective means to reconstruct low-abundance MAGs.Citation35 The co-assembly improved the recovery ratio of low-abundance MAGs in this study, and increased reconstructed potential of novel genomes.

The GTDB contains about 250,000 bacterial and archaeal genomes and provides a standardized genome-based taxonomy,Citation36 which efficiently helps to identify potential novel genomes and taxa. Comparing with reference genomes of GTDB, more than 95% MAGs were non-redundant genomes and more than 1/3 MAGs belonged to potential novel species in our study. Notably, about half of non-redundant genomes belonged to the class Clostridia and Bacteroidia, which played key roles in degrading complex carbohydrates.Citation37 For instance, several taxa of Clostridia, such as Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, were reportedly capable of degrading complex carbohydrates to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), maintaining the colonic health of host.Citation38,Citation39 The annotation of CAZymes also indicted more abundant GHs in these taxa, which could imply the great potential in converting polysaccharide to SCFAs.Citation40 In addition, previous study demonstrated that ARGs were enriched in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs.Citation7 The high-abundance ARGs might be closely associated with frequent usage of antibiotics for treatment of diarrhea. In this study, we found that members of Escherichia in guts of RMs were main carriers of ARGs. Therefore, monitoring and control of ARGs might need focus on members of Escherichia, especially Escherichia coli, regarded as an important indicator of pathogens. These MAGs provided new understanding for specific functions of gut microbiome of RMs.

Diarrhea disease could greatly alter the composition and decrease diversity of gut microbiome.Citation41 In this study, based on MAGs abundance in guts, we also demonstrated that chronic diarrhea significantly reduced the diversity of gut microbiome. Several taxa of MAGs showed significant difference between chronic diarrhea RMs and asymptomatic RMs. Most taxa were more abundant in guts of asymptomatic RMs than chronic diarrhea RMs. Of these taxa with significant difference, Bacteroidota mainly consisted of the members that are adept at polysaccharide degradation, due to carrying large numbers of CAZymes genes in genomes.Citation42,Citation43 In these MAGs of Bacteroidota in gut of asymptomatic RMs might be favorable for degradation of the indigestible polysaccharide. Comparing with chronic diarrhea RMs, these asymptomatic RMs had more lactic acid bacteria, such as Lactobacillus johnsonii, Lactobacillus amylovorus and Ligilactobacillus animalis. Lactic acid bacteria play probiotic roles in gut of host by means of competition of adhesion in epithelial cells with pathogens, producing antimicrobial peptides and SCFAs, and stimulating host defenses.Citation44,Citation45 Several species of Lactobacillus have been demonstrated probiotic functions in alleviating diarrhea and decreasing incidence of diarrhea.Citation46,Citation47 It suggested that gut of RMs was an important resource pool of probiotics. In these taxa with significant difference, Helicobacteraceae, Brachyspira and Anaerovibrio were prevalent in guts of asymptomatic RMs, but were hardly detected in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs. The Anaerovibrio was considered as the important species assisting in lipid hydrolysis to fatty acids.Citation48 Several species of Brachyspira were prevalent in NHPs and normally didn’t induce inflammatory response.Citation49,Citation50 These bacteria might be prevalent in guts of asymptomatic RMs, but the decrease of these taxa could be caused by antibiotic usage of chronic diarrhea RMs.

The species of Campylobacter, in particular C. jejuni and C. coli, were commonly considered as critical pathogens in leading intestinal disease of human.Citation51,Citation52 Although C. coli and C. jejuni were also reportedly associated with diarrhea of RMs,Citation8,Citation27,Citation28 all MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs were obviously distant to C. coli and C. jejuni in phylogenetic tree. MAGs of RMs were also different from MAGs of human. Most MAGs of Campylobacter from RMs carried flaA and flaB genes encoding the major flagellin FlaA and FlaB as important structures of flagella, which plays an important role in motility of bacteria.Citation53 In addition, the chemotaxis-associated genes, such as cheA, cheD, cheV and cheY, mediated the motile sense and directional move.Citation53 The flagella of Campylobacter contributed the motility but also invasion.Citation54 fliQ, fliG and fliP encoded type 3 secretion system (T3SS), medicating secretion of virulence proteins.Citation55 However, the key genes, such as ciaB and ciaC, encoding Campylobacter invasion antigens (Cia) was absent in MAGs of RMs. Comparing with reference genomes of C. coli and C. jejuni, adhesion-associated genes, such as cadF and capA, invasion associated genes, such as ciaB and ciaC, and toxin-associated genes, such as cdtA, cdtB and cdtC, were absent in MAGs of RMs. It might suggest the weaker virulence in these MAGs of RMs comparing with C. coli and C. jejuni. However, due to flagella-associated genes and chemotaxis-associated genes, these Campylobacter spp. not belonging to C. coli and C. jejuni still might cause diarrhea of RMs and should be paid attention to.

Helicobacter cinaedi was reportedly common in guts of captive RMs.Citation56 However, we didn’t obtain the genomes of Helicobacter cinaedi in this study. These MAGs of Helicobacteraceae were also distant to Helicobacter cinaedi. MAGs of Helicobacteraceae also carried the flaA or flaB genes. Similarly, flagella-associated genes and chemotaxis-associated genes were found in MAGs of Helicobacteraceae from RMs and other NHPs. This also suggested that these species of Helicobacteraceae possessed the important characters of motility and adhesion.Citation57 We also found most MAGs of Helicobacteraceae, in particular Helicobacter macacae, were found in guts of RMs and Macaca fascicularis. Therefore, Helicobacter macacae might be more prevalent in guts of Macaca monkey. The species of Helicobacteraceae were only found in guts of asymptomatic RMs and absent in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs. Previous study also found that Helicobacter macacae was lost in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs.Citation27 In general, Campylobacter and Helicobacter were typically colonized in gut mucosa. The pathological gut of chronic diarrhea RMs might be unfavorable for adhesion of them. Alternatively, antibiotic treatment of chronic diarrhea RMs might reduce abundances of Campylobacter and Helicobacter. Unfavorable adhesion and antibiotic usage might be main causes that Campylobacter and Helicobacter were decreased in guts of chronic diarrhea RMs.

Comparing with 2,985 MAGs of other NHPs,Citation18 more than 90% MAGs were non-redundant genomes and about half genomes represented different species. These unique genomes suggested that RMs’ gut harbored many unique microbes comparing with guts of other NHPs. Of these unique species, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae play key role in degrading carbohydrate to produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).Citation38,Citation39 Interestingly, most MAGs belonging to same strains or same species were found in MAGs of Macaca fascicularis. It could imply that host phylogeny plays an important role in shaping gut microbial composition.Citation22 We found that Prevotella, belonging to Bacteroidetes, were dominant taxa in gut of NHPs. Prevotella was associated with plant-rich diets of host.Citation58 The prevalence of Prevotella in guts of most NHPs might be associated with high-fiber diets of NHPs. We found that distribution and function of Prevotella were strong correlated with host phylogeny. The differences of Prevotella distribution and function were significant exhibited between higher clades instead of species of NHPs. It might suggest that adaptive evolution of Prevotella in guts of NHPs might earlier appear than existing phylogenetic evolution of NHPs.

In summary, we performed de novo assembly of 731 MAGs including many novel genomes, covering the shortage of gut microbial genomes from RMs. We found that members of Campylobacter and Helicobacteraceae might play potential roles in causing intestinal diarrhea of RMs due to flagella-associated virulence genes mediating motility and adhesion of bacteria. Unique gut microbial genomes in RMs suggested obvious difference in gut microbiome between RMs and other NHPs, and also further expanded the diversity of gut microbial genomes in NHPs. We revealed the distributions and functions of gut microbes in NHPs were prominently influenced by host phylogeny of NHPs. Taken together, our data strengthened the functional understanding of RM gut microbiome at genome level, in particular chronic diarrhea individuals, more importantly, and provide new insights in prevention for diarrhea of RMs. The data also strengthened the functional understanding of NHP gut microbiome at genome level and indicated coevolution between host and gut microbiome in NHPs.

Materials and methods

Reconstruction of metagenome-assembled genomes

Metagenomic binning of 29 fecal metagenomes of RMs from our previous studyCitation7 were performed. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University (No. 20210308001). The 29 fecal metagenomes of RMs were from 18 asymptomatic RMs and 11 chronic diarrhea RMs (Supplementary Table S6). Raw metagenomic reads were trimmed and filtered to remove adapters, low-quality reads and hosts’ sequences using TrimmomaticCitation59 and Bowtie2Citation60 as KneadData pipeline (https://github.com/biobakery/kneaddata). The assembly of single sample were performed using MEGAHITCitation61 with the option – min-contig-len 300. To retrieve low-abundance bins as much as possible, co-assembly of diarrheal and asymptomatic samples were separately performed using MEGAHIT with the option – continue –kmin-1pass – k-list 27,37,47,57,67,77,87 –min-contig-len 1000. The co-assembly of asymptomatic samples was performed in two batches with 9 samples per batch. Bowtie2 was used to map metagenomic reads back to these single-sample assemblies and co-assemblies. SAMtoolsCitation62 converted SAM file to BAM file. Metagenomic binning of single-sample assembly and co-assembly was performed using MetaBAT2Citation63 with the option – minContigDepth 2 –minContigLength 2000. Raw bins were dereplicated at default threshold of 99% average nucleotide identity (ANI) using dRepCitation64 with the option dereplicate_wf -comp 80 -con 10 -str 100 -strW 0. Bins were also dereplicated using dRep at threshold of 95% ANI to obtain SGBs. The ANI between genomes was calculated by FastANI.Citation65 The completeness and contamination of all bins were evaluated by CheckM.Citation66

Prediction of taxonomy label of MAGs and quantification of MAGs in metagenomes

The putative taxonomy label of MAGs was predicted using GTDB-TkCitation67 with the ‘classify_wf’ function. GTDB-Tk annotation is based on Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) taxonomy.Citation36 We also obtained NCBI taxonomy of MAGs using script “gtdb_to_ncbi_majority_vote.py” (available from https://github.com/Ecogenomics/GTDBTk/). The putative taxonomy label of MAGs based on GTDB taxonomy was determined by the lowest taxonomy level of classification result of GTDB-Tk. These MAGs were also analyzed using MAGpy,Citation68 which uses a Snakemake pipeline based on freely available bioinformatics softwares, including CheckM, Prodigal,Citation69 PfamScan,Citation70 Sourmash,Citation71 PhyloPhlAnCitation72 and DIAMOND BLASTP.Citation73 The phylogenetic tree of MAGs was constructed by PhyloPhlAn based on more than 400 most conserved proteins from microbial genomes, and was drawn by Figtree (https://github.com/rambaut/figtree) and GraPhlAn.Citation74

The abundance of MAGs in metagenome was quantified using SalmonCitation75 with “quant_bins” module of MetaWRAPCitation76 to estimate the abundance of each scaffold in each sample, and then compute the average abundance of bin. Metagenomic reads were aligned using BWA MEMCitation77 and mapping ratios of reads were calculated using SAMtools.

The function annotation of MAGs

The genes of MAGs were predicted and translated to amino acid sequence by Prodigal. These non-redundant gene sets at proteins level were constructed using CD-HITCitation78 with similarity of 99%, 95% and 90%. These non-redundant genes were aligned to UniProt TrEMBL, UniRef90 and UniRef50 database using DIAMOND, as well were aligned to eggNOG databaseCitation79 using eggNOG-Mapper.Citation80 CAZymes genes were identified using hmmscanCitation81 based on dbCAN database.Citation82 ARGs were identified using RGICitation83 based on comprehensive antibiotic resistance database (CARD).Citation83 KEGG orthologys (KOs) were annotated using KofamKOALA.Citation84 The rRNA genes of MAGs were predicted using barrnap (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap). Virulence-associated genes were annotated using DIAMOND to align to virulence factor database (VFDB)Citation85 at thresholds of 70% similarity and e-value<1e-5. MAGs were functionally annotated based on Uniref50 using DIAMOND. The non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots were drawn using the metaMDS function based on Jaccard distance.

Authors’ contributions

SY and ZF wrote the manuscript. SY, ZF, JiaweiL, XW and YL performed the bioinformatics analyses. BY and MH revised the manuscript. AZ and JingL designed and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University (No. 20210308001).

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (2.2 MB)

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2023.2188848

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in CNGB Sequence Archive (CNSA) of China National GeneBank DataBase (CNGBdb) with accession number CNP0001810 at https://db.cngb.org/.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (No. 2023NSFSC1935), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070413) and Key R&D Program of Sichuan Province (No. 22ZDZX0011).

References

  • Itell HL, Kaur A, Deere JD, Barry PA, Permar SR. Rhesus monkeys for a nonhuman primate model of cytomegalovirus infections. Curr Opin Virol. 2017;25:126–17. doi:10.1016/j.coviro.2017.08.005.
  • Colombo APV, Paster BJ, Grimaldi G, Lourenco TGB, Teva A, Campos-Neto A, McCluskey J, Kleanthous H, Van Dyke TE, Stashenko P. Clinical and microbiological parameters of naturally occurring periodontitis in the non-human primate Macaca mulatta. J Oral Microbiol. 2017;9(1):1403843. doi:10.1080/20002297.2017.1403843.
  • Morissette M, Di Paolo T. Non-human primate models of PD to test novel therapies. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018;125(3):291–324. doi:10.1007/s00702-017-1722-y.
  • Wang K-Y, Christe KL, Yee J, Roberts JA, Ardeshir A. Rotavirus is associated with decompensated diarrhea among young rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Am J Primatol. 2019;81(1):e22948. doi:10.1002/ajp.22948.
  • Westreich ST, Ardeshir A, Alkan Z, Kable ME, Korf I, Lemay DG. Fecal metatranscriptomics of macaques with idiopathic chronic diarrhea reveals altered mucin degradation and fucose utilization. Microbiome. 2019;7(1). doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0664-z.
  • Rhoades N, Barr T, Hendrickson S, Prongay K, Haertel A, Gill L, Garzel L, Whiteson K, Slifka M, Messaoudi I. Maturation of the infant rhesus macaque gut microbiome and its role in the development of diarrheal disease. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):20. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1789-x.
  • Yang SZ, Liu Y, Yang N, Lan Y, Lan WQ, Feng JY, Yue BS, He M, Zhang L, Zhang AY, et al. The gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of chronic diarrhea rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and its similarity to the human gut microbiome. Microbiome. 2022;10(1). doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01218-3.
  • Sestak K, Merritt CK, Borda J, Saylor E, Schwamberger SR, Cogswell F, Didier ES, Didier PJ, Plauche G, Bohm RP, et al. Infectious agent and immune response characteristics of chronic enterocolitis in captive rhesus macaques. Infect Immun. 2003;71(7):4079–4086. doi:10.1128/IAI.71.7.4079-4086.2003.
  • Forster SC, Kumar N, Anonye BO, Almeida A, Viciani E, Stares MD, Dunn M, Mkandawire TT, Zhu A, Shao Y, et al. A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(2):186–192. doi:10.1038/s41587-018-0009-7.
  • Zou YQ, Xue WB, Luo GW, Deng ZQ, Qin PP, Guo RJ, Sun HP, Xia Y, Liang SS, Dai Y, et al. 1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(2):179–185. doi:10.1038/s41587-018-0008-8.
  • Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA, Stares MD, Goulding D, Lawley TD. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 2016;533(7604):543–546. doi:10.1038/nature17645.
  • Liu C, Zhou N, Du MX, Sun YT, Wang K, Wang YJ, Li DH, Yu HY, Song Y, Bai BB, et al. The mouse gut microbial biobank expands the coverage of cultured bacteria. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):79. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13836-5.
  • Stewart RD, Auffret MD, Warr A, Walker AW, Roehe R, Watson M. Compendium of 4,941 rumen metagenome-assembled genomes for rumen microbiome biology and enzyme discovery. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):953–961. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0202-3.
  • Glendinning L, Stewart RD, Pallen MJ, Watson KA, Watson M. Assembly of hundreds of novel bacterial genomes from the chicken caecum. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):21. doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1947-1.
  • Lesker TR, Durairaj AC, Galvez EJC, Lagkouvardos I, Baines JF, Clavel T, Sczyrba A, McHardy AC, Strowig T. An integrated metagenome catalog reveals new insights into the murine gut microbiome. Cell Rep. 2020;30(9):2909–2922. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.036.
  • Papudeshi B, Haggerty JM, Doane M, Morris MM, Walsh K, Beattie DT, Pande D, Zaeri P, Silva GGZ, Thompson F, et al. Optimizing and evaluating the reconstruction of Metagenome-assembled microbial genomes. BMC Genomics. 2017;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12864-017-4294-1.
  • Parks DH, Rinke C, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Woodcroft BJ, Evans PN, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2(11):1533–1542. doi:10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7.
  • Manara S, Asnicar F, Beghini F, Bazzani D, Cumbo F, Zolfo M, Nigro E, Karcher N, Manghi P, Metzger MI, et al. Microbial genomes from non-human primate gut metagenomes expand the primate-associated bacterial tree of life with over 1000 novel species. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):20. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1923-9.
  • Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320(5883):1647. doi:10.1126/science.1155725.
  • Youngblut ND, Reischer GH, Walters W, Schuster N, Walzer C, Stalder G, Ley RE, Farnleitner AH. Host diet and evolutionary history explain different aspects of gut microbiome diversity among vertebrate clades. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):10. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10191-3.
  • Yildirim S, Yeoman CJ, Sipos M, Torralba M, Wilson BA, Goldberg TL, Stumpf RM, Leigh SR, White BA, Nelson KE, et al. Characterization of the fecal microbiome from non-human wild primates reveals species specific microbial communities. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e13963. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013963.
  • Amato KR, Sanders JG, Song SJ, Nute M, Metcalf JL, Thompson LR, Morton JT, Amir A, McKenzie VJ, Humphrey G, et al. Evolutionary trends in host physiology outweigh dietary niche in structuring primate gut microbiomes. Isme J. 2019;13(3):576–587. doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0175-0.
  • Ochman H, Worobey M, Kuo CH, Ndjango JBN, Peeters M, Hahn BH, Hugenholtz P, Achtman M. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(11):e1000546. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000546.
  • Garud NR, Good BH, Hallatschek O, Pollard KS, Gordo I. Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(1):e3000102. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000102.
  • Walter J, Ley R. The human gut microbiome: ecology and recent evolutionary changes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65(1):411–429. doi:10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102830.
  • Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, Schulz F, Jarett J, Rivers AR, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(8):725–731. doi:10.1038/nbt.3893.
  • Laing ST, Merriam D, Shock BC, Mills S, Spinner A, Reader R, Hartigan-O’connor DJ. Idiopathic colitis in rhesus macaques is associated with dysbiosis, abundant enterochromaffin cells and altered T-cell cytokine expression. Vet Pathol. 2018;55(5):741–752. doi:10.1177/0300985818780449.
  • Howell S, White D, Ingram S, Jackson R, Larin J, Morales P, Garcia AP, Hicks C, Hopper K, Wagner J. A bio-behavioral study of chronic idiopathic colitis in the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012;137(3–4):208–220. doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.003.
  • Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, Beghini F, Manghi P, Tett A, Ghensi P, et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell. 2019;176(3):649–662. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.001.
  • Fox JG, Handt L, Xu S, Shen Z, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Dangler CA, Lodge K, Motzel S, Klein H. Novel Helicobacter species isolated from rhesus monkeys with chronic idiopathic colitis. J Med Microbiol. 2001;50(5):421–429. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-50-5-421.
  • Chen T, Li Y, Liang J, Li Y, Huang Z. Gut microbiota of provisioned and wild rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) living in a limestone forest in southwest Guangxi, China. Microbiologyopen. 2020;9(3):e981. doi:10.1002/mbo3.981.
  • Cui YF, Wang FJ, Yu L, Ye HH, Yang GB. Metagenomic comparison of the rectal microbiota between rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Zool Res. 2019;40(2):89–93. doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.061.
  • Adriansjach J, Baum ST, Lefkowitz EJ, Der Pol Wj V, Buford TW, Colman RJ, Masternak M. Age-related differences in the gut microbiome of rhesus macaques. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(7):1293–1298. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaa048.
  • Zhao JS, Yao YF, Li DY, Xu HM, Wu JY, Wen AX, Xie M, Ni QY, Zhang MW, Peng GN, et al. Characterization of the gut microbiota in six geographical populations of Chinese rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), implying an adaptation to high-altitude environment. Microb Ecol. 2018;76(2):565–577. doi:10.1007/s00248-018-1146-8.
  • Stewart RD, Auffret MD, Warr A, Wiser AH, Press MO, Langford KW, Liachko I, Snelling TJ, Dewhurst RJ, Walker AW, et al. Assembly of 913 microbial genomes from metagenomic sequencing of the cow rumen. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):870. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03317-6.
  • Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil PA, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38(9):1079–1086. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8.
  • Faber F, Baumler AJ. The impact of intestinal inflammation on the nutritional environment of the gut microbiota. Immunol Lett. 2014;162(2):48–53. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2014.04.014.
  • Vacca M, Celano G, Calabrese FM, Portincasa P, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M. The controversial role of human gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):573. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8040573.
  • Qing Y, Xie H, Su C, Wang Y, Yu Q, Pang Q, Cui F. Gut Microbiome, short-chain fatty acids, and mucosa injury in young adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(7):1830–1843. doi:10.1007/s10620-018-5428-2.
  • Almeida A, Nayfach S, Boland M, Strozzi F, Beracochea M, Shi ZJ, Pollard KS, Sakharova E, Parks DH, Hugenholtz P, et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(1):105–114. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0603-3.
  • Li Y, Xia S, Jiang X, Feng C, Gong S, Ma J, Fang Z, Yin J, Yin Y. Gut microbiota and diarrhea: an updated review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:625210. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.625210.
  • Thomas F, Hehemann JH, Rebuffet E, Czjzek M, Michel G. Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:93. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00093.
  • Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes. 2012;3(4):289–306. doi:10.4161/gmic.19897.
  • Do Carmo Ms, Santos CID, Araujo MC, Giron JA, Fernandes ES, Monteiro-Neto V, Do Carmo MS. Probiotics, mechanisms of action, and clinical perspectives for diarrhea management in children. Food Funct. 2018;9(10):5074–5095. doi:10.1039/C8FO00376A.
  • Zhang Z, Lv J, Pan L, Zhang Y. Roles and applications of probiotic Lactobacillus strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(19):8135–8143. doi:10.1007/s00253-018-9217-9.
  • Dong H, Liu B, Li A, Iqbal M, Mehmood K, Jamil T, Chang YF, Zhang H, Wu Q. Microbiome analysis reveals the attenuation effect of lactobacillus from yaks on diarrhea via modulation of gut microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:610781. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.610781.
  • Bian X, Wang TT, Xu M, Evivie SE, Luo GW, Liang HZ, Yu SF, Huo GC. Effect of Lactobacillus strains on intestinal microflora and mucosa immunity in Escherichia coli O157: h7-induced diarrhea in mice. Curr Microbiol. 2016;73(1):65–70. doi:10.1007/s00284-016-1010-3.
  • Prive F, Kaderbhai NN, Girdwood S, Worgan HJ, Pinloche E, Scollan ND, Huws SA, Newbold CJ, Planet PJ. Identification and characterization of three novel lipases belonging to families II and V from Anaerovibrio lipolyticus 5ST. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e69076. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069076.
  • Spiller RC, Jalanka J. Brachyspira and IBS with diarrhoea: a Helicobacter pylori moment? Gut. 2021;70(6):1008–1009. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323370.
  • Smith JL. Colonic spirochetosis in animals and humans. J Food Prot. 2005;68(7):1525–1534. doi:10.4315/0362-028X-68.7.1525.
  • Liu F, Ma R, Wang Y, Zhang L. The clinical importance of Campylobacter concisus and other human hosted Campylobacter species. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:243. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2018.00243.
  • Wieczorek K, Wolkowicz T, Osek J. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence-associated traits of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry food chain and humans with diarrhea. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1508. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01508.
  • Bolton DJ. Campylobacter virulence and survival factors. Food Microbiol. 2015;48:99–108. doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.017.
  • Guerry P. Campylobacter flagella: not just for motility. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15(10):456–461. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.09.006.
  • Neal-McKinney JM, Christensen JE, Konkel ME. Amino-terminal residues dictate the export efficiency of the Campylobacter jejuni filament proteins via the flagellum. Mol Microbiol. 2010;76(4):918–931. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07144.x.
  • Fernandez KR, Hansen LM, Vandamme P, Beaman BL, Solnick JV. Captive rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) are commonly infected with Helicobacter cinaedi. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(6):1908–1912. doi:10.1128/JCM.40.6.1908-1912.2002.
  • Gu H. Role of flagella in the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori. Curr Microbiol. 2017;74(7):863–869. doi:10.1007/s00284-017-1256-4.
  • Tett A, Pasolli E, Masetti G, Ercolini D, Segata N. Prevotella diversity, niches and interactions with the human host. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(9):585–599. doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00559-y.
  • Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170.
  • Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923.
  • Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–1676. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033.
  • Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Proc GPD. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352.
  • Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. doi:10.7717/peerj.7359.
  • Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Jf B. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. Isme J. 2017;11(12):2864–2868. doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.126.
  • Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9.
  • Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–1055. doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114.
  • Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH, Hancock J. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–1927. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848.
  • Stewart RD, Auffret MD, Snelling TJ, Roehe R, Watson M, Birol I. Magpy: a reproducible pipeline for the downstream analysis of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). Bioinformatics. 2019;35(12):2150–2152. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty905.
  • Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11(1):119. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119.
  • Finn RD, Bateman A, Clements J, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Heger A, Hetherington K, Holm L, Mistry J, et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D222–30. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1223.
  • Brown CT, Irber L. Sourmash: a library for MinHash sketching of DNA. J Open Source Softw. 2016;1(5):27. doi:10.21105/joss.00027.
  • Segata N, Bornigen D, Morgan XC, Huttenhower C. PhyloPhlAn is a new method for improved phylogenetic and taxonomic placement of microbes. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms3304.
  • Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3176.
  • Asnicar F, Weingart G, Tickle TL, Huttenhower C, Segata N. Compact graphical representation of phylogenetic data and metadata with GraPhlAn. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1029. doi:10.7717/peerj.1029.
  • Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14(4):417–419. doi:10.1038/nmeth.4197.
  • Uritskiy GV, DiRuggiero J, Taylor J. MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome. 2018;6(1):158. doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0541-1.
  • Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.
  • Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–3152. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565.
  • Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernandez-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, Mende DR, Letunic I, Rattei T, Jensen LJ, et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D309–14. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1085.
  • Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(8):2115–2122. doi:10.1093/molbev/msx148.
  • Eddy SR, Pearson WR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(10):e1002195. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195.
  • Zhang H, Yohe T, Huang L, Entwistle S, Wu P, Yang Z, Busk PK, Xu Y, Yin Y. dbCAN2: a meta server for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W95–101. doi:10.1093/nar/gky418.
  • Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen ALV, Cheng AA, Liu SH, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–25. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz935.
  • Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, Ogata H, Valencia A. KofamKOALA: kEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(7):2251–2252. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859.
  • Chen LH, Yang J, Yu J, Ya ZJ, Sun LL, Shen Y, Jin Q. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Database issue):D325–8. doi:10.1093/nar/gki008.