Abstract
In this article, we outline standards and recommendations for single-case research design (SCRD) graph construction to improve readability, transparency, and interpretation. Prior research indicates large variability among graph representation resulting in misinterpretation and lack of clarity of reported findings. Prominent graph features are discussed including esthetic and analysis altering characteristics. We provide a conceptual checklist along with visual and narrative descriptions to support the construction of SCRD graphs and help guide practitioners and researchers with reporting and displaying SCRD data.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Cian L. Brown
Cian L. Brown, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of Professional Counseling in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Oklahoma. He is a Licensed Professional Counselor - Supervisor (LPC-S), Nationally Certified Counselor (NCC), and board certified associate fellow in neurofeedback (BCN-Associate Fellow). His research includes exploring the use of school-based mental health interventions, program evaluation, and quantitative research methods in counseling.
Corey Peltier
Corey Peltier, PhD, is an Assistant Professor of special education in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Oklahoma. His research includes identifying effective interventions and assessment procedures to improve behavioral outcomes for identified students or at-risk for disabilities. Additionally, his research explores methodological issues surrounding the use of single-case research designs (see #SCRDChat on Twitter) or systematic reviews and meta-analysis to inform best practice.
David Y. Lee
David Y. Lee is a graduate research assistant and master’s student of the Professional Counseling program in the Department of Educational Psychology at the University of Oklahoma.