361
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

A report of resources used by clinicians in the UK to support motor neuron disease genomic testing

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 410-412 | Received 05 Dec 2023, Accepted 18 Dec 2023, Published online: 02 Jan 2024

Abstract

Genetic testing is a key decision-making point for people with motor neuron disease (MND); to establish eligibility for clinical trials, better understand the cause of their condition, and confirm the potential risk to relatives, who may be able to access predictive testing. Given the wide-reaching implications of MND genetic and predictive testing, it is essential that families are given adequate information, and that staff are provided with appropriate training. In this report we overview the information resources available to people with MND and family members around genetic testing, and the educational and training resources available to staff, based on information obtained through a freedom of information request to UK-based NHS Trusts. MND Association resources were most commonly used in information sharing, though we highlight distinctions between neurology and genetics centers. No respondents identified comprehensive training around MND genetic testing. We conclude with practice implications and priorities for the development of resources and training.

Introduction

Genetic testing is a key decision-making point for people with MND (pwMND), to establish their eligibility for clinical trials, better understand the cause of their condition and the potential risk to relatives. Family members of gene carriers may be able to access predictive testing to determine whether they have an increased chance of developing MND. In both cases, these are complex and multifaceted decisions with a range of implications for the individual and family. It is essential that families are provided with adequate information and resources to make informed decisions about genetic testing, and that staff are given appropriate training (Citation1). Here, we survey resources available to clinicians in the United Kingdom to support MND genetic testing.

Methods

Ethical approval was granted by the University of Sheffield (056228). A freedom of information (FOI) request was submitted to NHS Trusts hosting MND care centers (n = 23) or regional clinical genetics centers (n = 23). The request sought confirmation as to whether the service offered MND genetic testing and predictive testing; what leaflets and websites are provided or signposted to pwMND and relatives on MND genetic testing and predictive testing; and what letters, leaflets or websites are provided to facilitate family communication. Trusts were also asked what educational resources or training they have to support staff with MND genetic testing and predictive testing. The request was sent in August 2023, with responses received within 20 working days.

Results

A total of 33 responses were received (from 17/23 [74%] MND care centers and 16/23 [69%] regional genetics centers). There were differences in resources reported by MND care centers and regional genetics centers (). The most common information resources provided to pwMND, or relatives considering predictive testing, were those produced by the UK MND Association. These included webpages and information sheets on inherited MND, genetic testing and insurance. Locally produced resources covered general information (e.g., around inheritance patterns and genetic testing in neurodegenerative diseases) and were not MND-specific. The most common resources used to facilitate family communication by MND clinics were MND Association resources or referral to clinical genetics, while genetics clinicians supported information sharing with bespoke clinic letters. Three trusts reported no resources to share with pwMND around genetic testing, relatives around predictive testing, or to facilitate family communication respectively.

Table 1. Resources for people with MND and family members around genetic testing.

Ten trusts reported having no educational resources or training to support staff with MND genetic testing, increasing to twelve for predictive testing (with an even split between neurology and genetics centers). No respondents identified comprehensive training or educational resources for MND genetics/genetic testing ().

Table 2. Educational resources and training for staff around genetic testing.

Discussion and conclusions

Most services signposted pwMND and family members to national MND charities for information around MND genetic testing and predictive testing; almost no services reported training staff to support their delivery of information about genetic or predictive testing. Although MND professionals often access continuing professional development training on genomics (e.g. Genomics Education Programme), these courses do not cover MND-specific issues, e.g., oligogenic inheritance and implications for treatment effectiveness.

Given these findings, it seems unlikely pwMND, and family members, are making informed decisions about testing with professionals managing their MND (Citation2). This highlights the need for services to provide accessible, written information to support pwMND and family members to understand the consequences of genetic and predictive testing (Citation3,Citation4), and suggests a role for developing patient decision aids (PDAs) to support shared decision making about treatment and testing with MND preofessionals (Citation5).

Whilst this report describes snapshot of information provision, it underscores that there is a dearth of resources for pwMND, relatives and staff around genetic testing. The current public-facing and staff resources are a starting point, yet a standardized approach is needed to ensure equitable access to tailored information and training. The research landscape around MND genetic testing, predictive testing and personalized medicine is rapidly increasing (Citation6). Staff require upskilling to support proactively the conversations around these complex genetics of MND, and their consequences for pwMND and their family members.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the motor neuron disease association under Grant McNeill/Oct21/967-794 Motor Neurone Disease Association.

References

  • Crook A, McEwen A. Genetic counselling and testing for neurodegenerative disorders using a proposed standard of practice for ALS/MND: diagnostic testing comes first. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:394–5.
  • NICE. Shared decision making, NICE guideline. June 17, 2021. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197. Accessed November 27, 2023.
  • Salmon K, Ross JP, Bertone V, Gobbo M, Anoja N, Karamchandani J, et al. The value of testing for ATXN2 intermediate repeat expansions in routine clinical practice for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:1205–7.
  • Crook A, Jacobs C, Newton‐John T, McEwen A. Genetic counseling and diagnostic genetic testing for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and/or frontotemporal dementia: a qualitative study of client experiences. J Genet Couns. 2022;31:1206–18.
  • Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A. Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16:i20–i38.
  • De Oliveira HM, Soma A, Baker MR, Turner MR, Talbot K, Williams TL. A survey of current practice in genetic testing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the UK and Republic of Ireland: implications for future planning. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2023;24:405–13.