1,728
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

C syndrome - what do we know and what could the future hold?

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 91-94 | Received 06 Sep 2018, Accepted 27 Feb 2019, Published online: 07 Mar 2019

In 1969 Opitz et al. [Citation1] described two siblings with a new syndrome, which they called ‘C syndrome of multiple congenital abnormalities’ and was presented as a ‘probably private syndrome’. After this first description, new cases appeared with highly similar phenotypes and a new syndrome, known as C Syndrome, Opitz C Syndrome or Opitz Trigonocephaly Syndrome (OCS; MIM # 211,750) was firmly established [Citation2Citation4].

OCS is clinically very variable, with a broad range of severity. It is characterized by developmental delay that is usually severe (but some cases with mild to normal intellect have been reported [Citation4Citation6]). Trigonocephaly (due to the premature fusion of the metopic suture) is one of its main characteristics and, while it is not exclusive, it has become mandatory and definitional of OCS. The syndrome is also characterized by a particular set of facial dysmorphisms including an atypical nose (short, with a broad nasal bridge, micro- o retrognatia), anomalies of the eyes (hypotelorism or hypertelorism, thick epicanthic folds, strabismus, proptosis) and many of these anomalies might be attributed to the trigonocephalic ‘“sequence”’. More specific of OCS are the oral anomalies commonly present in OCS patients, with alterations of the upper lip and philtrum, broad alveolar ridges with rugose anterior palatal mucosa, high arched palates and tooth malposition that may lead to mastication problems and feeding difficulties. Auricles are often low set, posteriorly angulated, and with abnormal helix and the neck is usually short and with redundant skin. Shortening of the limbs (especially rhizomelic and acromelic segments) and hypermobility of the joints are also common traits, together with polydactyly, and syndactyly. Some deformities of the trunk, including scoliosis, kyphosis, short or prominent sternum, widely spaced nipples and slender ribs are usually observed. Hypotonia, sometimes even in combination with hypertonia, and contractures, are also frequent, together with flexion deformities, especially in hands and feet. A variety of internal anomalies are also common, especially cardiac defects (present in one half of OCS cases). Abnormal lobulations of the lungs and kidneys or malformations of the pancreas or liver are frequently reported. Many of the patients presented seizures at some point of their lives. Usually, the pregnancies go without complications, but sometimes anhydramnios due to renal anomalies or some of the most severe congenital anomalies could be detected by ultrasonography [Citation4,Citation7Citation9]. CNS malformations (agenesis of the corpus callosum, cerebellar atrophy and Dandy-Walker malformation among others) are common, and, as has been pointed out previously [Citation7], all suggest that OCS represents a developmental defect of the cerebral midline. While none of the traits are obligatory (with the probable exception of trigonocephaly or prominent metopic suture) a combination of them should be present to represent the Opitz C clinical entity [Citation9].

Since 1969, some 60 cases have been reported in the literature [Citation1Citation7,Citation9Citation35] but they seem to represent a heterogeneous grouping. First, some cases carry chromosomal abnormalities, in chromosome 3 (del 3q [Citation11], rec(3) [Citation13], 3p trisomy [Citation23]) or involving other chromosomes such as t(13;18)(q22;q23 [Citation19], reciprocal translocation t(2;17)(p25;q24) [Citation26], 13q22-qter partial trisomy [Citation36], 9q deletions [Citation27], reciprocal translocation t(3;18)(q13.13;q12.1) [Citation28], a deletion at 4q28.3q31.23 [Citation37] and der(7)t(7;13)(p22;q21) [Citation31]. While these cases would not be considered as simple OCS, there could be putative genes related to OCS pathology in these chromosomal regions. In this sense, the 9q34.3 deletion first described in an OCS patient, has been identified as a microdeletion syndrome known as Kleefstra Syndrome [Citation38], with some clinical overlap with OCS. Second, it has to be taken into account that, while trigonocephaly is one of the main characteristics of the OCS and it is a definitional trait, it is a common trait present in many other syndromes, including terminal deletions at 3p, 9p and 11q and in the distal 3q trisomy [Citation23].

The relatively broad clinical spectrum of OCS overlaps other clinical entities and some patients initially considered as OCS have been finally re-diagnosed to other syndromes such as the Kleefstra Syndrome mentioned previously, Varady Syndrome or Kabuki syndrome [Citation21,Citation27,Citation39Citation41]. In 1999, a new syndrome highly overlapping OCS but with a more severe outcome was delineated. This C-like syndrome or Bohring-Opitz Syndrome (BOS, MIM # 605,039) is clinically -and genetically- more homogeneous and it is mainly characterized by trigonocephaly (and microcephaly), nevus simplex (flammeus), intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), failure to thrive, severe to profound developmental delay and characteristic fixed flexions of the elbows, wrists and metacarpophalangeal joints, known as BOS posture [Citation42]. BOS is mainly due to mutations in the ASXL1 gene [Citation42Citation44]. In near one third of the patients fitting a typical clinical BOS phenotype no mutations in ASXL1 can be detected, suggesting that it is a heterogeneous entity. In this sense, mutations in ASXL3 [Citation45]; ASXL2 [Citation46] and KLHL7 [Citation47] have been identified in patients clinically overlapping BOS.

The first gene associated with OCS was CD96 (in chromosome 3q) [Citation29], found truncated in a patient diagnosed as OCS who bore a balanced translocation t(3;18)(q13.13;q12.1). These authors also identified a missense mutation in CD96 in a patient diagnosed as BOS and demonstrated loss of adhesion and growth activities in vitro in cells with mutated CD96. While this gene plays a crucial role in inhibiting NK cells, in immune regulation and in surveillance [Citation48], its role in OCS has been questioned. Firstly, Darlow et al [Citation49] identified a t(2;3) balanced translocation disrupting CD96 in patients who developed renal cell carcinoma without any symptoms of OCS. Secondly, in a study involving 10 OCS patients, no mutations in CD96 could be identified [Citation32]. Finally, the Cd96−/− mice do not present any neurodevelopmental phenotype and are, mainly, phenotypically normal [Citation50]. While the CD96 deficiency could be playing some role in the presentation of the patient described by Kaname et al. it doesn’t seem to be responsible for the disease. Interestingly, the ASXL3 gene maps close to Kaname’s patient break point at 18q12.1, and thus, could be the real cause of the disease in this patient.

Recent studies have identified two heterozygous mutations in the IFT140 gene in one patient diagnosed as OCS [Citation33]. Both mutations would lead to the loss of the functional protein (initiation codon loss and splice site mutation). This gene is associated with short-rib thoracic dysplasia 9 with or without polydactyly (SRTD9; MIM # 266,920), a ciliopathy associated with skeletal and renal dysplasia, retinal pigmentary dystrophy and cerebellar ataxia. Polydactyly is also a common trait for these patients. These authors suggested that many of the OCS symptoms overlap with those of a cilliopathy, including dysplasia of kidneys, liver and pancreas with cystic changes, as well as some of the skeletal anomalies observed in some OCS patients, and highlight that retinitis pigmentosa, together with Caroli’s syndrome and renal failure, was also previously described in another OCS patient [Citation24].

Recent works have also identified heterozygous mutations in MAGEL2 [Citation34] and FOXP1 [Citation35] in 2 patients with initial diagnoses of OCS. MAGEL2-truncating mutations have been associated with a new syndrome described in 2013 [Citation51], known as Schaaf-Yang Syndrome (SYS, MIM # 615,547) and also with severe arthrogryposis [Citation52]. SYS displays significant clinical overlap with OCS, including severe developmental delay, hypotonia, seizures, feeding problems in infancy and arthrogryposis or joint contractures and the fact that some patients presented with trigonocephaly or a prominent metopic suture. In contrast, the patient (MG) presented with thick palatal and alveolar ridges and multiple dislocations, more typical of OCS, and these features were absent in all the other SYS patients described, including those bearing the exact same mutation as that of patient MG. MAGEL2 truncating mutations have been also found in patients diagnosed as Chitayat-Hall Syndrome [Citation53], characterized by distal arthrogryposis with hypopituitarism including growth hormone deficiency, intellectual disability, and facial anomalies, also common features in SYS, highlighting the broad clinical spectrum and overlap of these syndromes. Heterozygous mutations in FOXP1 have been associated with intellectual disability (ID) with language delay, with or without autistic features (MIM #613,670). The FOXP1 Syndrome patients presented with intellectual disability (ID) with speech and language impairment and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). They also presented with some facial dysmorphisms including hypertelorism, strabismus, high-arched palate, short stature and enuresis, and thus, displaying some overlap with OCS. In this case, hitherto the patient initially diagnosed as OCS is the only FOXP1 syndrome patient presenting with true trigonocephaly, and thus, it is unclear if this condition is due to the FOXP1 mutation or to another unknown condition present in this patient. In fact, the OCS phenotype of this patient was very apparent during early childhood, but it has been reconsidered after his development, a common fact among other ‘OCS patients’.

Unlike the relatively genetically homogeneous BOS syndrome, OCS appears to be an extremely heterogeneous entity, and somehow, a ‘private syndrome’ for each patient, as first postulated by Opitz et al [Citation1]. It is evident now that there is no common genetic cause for OCS and in fact, some authors have declared it ‘extinct’ [Citation54]. It is clear that it cannot be considered an ‘autosomal recessive disorder’ any more, as other inheritance patterns have been observed, mainly the de novo dominant pattern. This has to be taken into account during genetic counseling as the risk of recurrence is unknown until a molecular diagnosis is achieved. In our opinion, OCS still represents a useful clinical description that summarizes a constellation of symptoms helping clinicians and geneticists to narrow the clinical spectrum of the patient, helping in the difficult task of the diagnosis of severe neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD). Nowadays, whole exome sequencing (WES) is a powerful tool that will allow to identify the molecular basis of most (if not all) of the cases initially diagnosed with the OCS phenotype, as has been achieved in the 3 last cases previously mentioned, and thus, to re-diagnose each patient according with the particular molecular cause of the disease. The OCS phenotype also helps to highlight their particularities, as the thick palatal and alveolar ridges or the multiple dislocations in the MAGEL2 patient and the trigonocephaly in the FOXP1 patient diagnosed by us. Finally, the OCS clinical ‘label’ helps also the patients and their families to navigate during the diagnosis odyssey that usually represents their early lives, giving the families the solace of a name to an unknown condition, in contrast with the ‘unknown’ label that is usually extremely stressful for these families.

In this context, it is obvious that there is no option to a global OCS therapy right now. So far the only approaches are the surgical correction of the trigonocephaly and internal anomalies such as cardiovascular malformations, and symptomatic treatment as in the case of seizures. In each case, the identification of the molecular cause of the disease opens a door to particular therapeutic strategies, such as the undergoing clinical trials on Oxytocin treatment for SYS patients and their treatment with growth hormone, as has been suggested [Citation53,Citation55]. Still in the case of MAGEL2, as it is a maternally silenced gene enclosed in the Prader-Willy chromosomal region, reactivation of the maternal allele could be a therapeutic strategy, as has been shown for other genes of the PW region [Citation56]. In OCS in general, the main challenge now is to improve our knowledge on its molecular basis. Functional studies are necessary to stablish if the OCS associated mutations represent loss or gain of function and to identify common functional denominators and converging pathways that could be the target of orphan drugs. Interestingly, there is a strong link between development and cancer [Citation57]. So far, FOXP1, ASXL1, ASXL2 and ASXL3, all related to OCS, BOS or similar clinical entities, have been found involved in cancer development or malignancy [Citation58,Citation59]. This relationship makes it possible to take advantage of the knowledge obtained from cancer research, and may open a door to the use of cancer drugs in neurodevelopmental diseases. In this sense, drug repurposing is a promising and affordable option in extremely rare diseases such as OCS and it is starting to be a reality for other rare diseases. It is the case of arimoclomol, a candidate drug to treat insulin resistance [Citation60], granted orphan drug designation for multiple lysosomal storage disorders including Niemann-Pick disease type C (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02612129) [Citation61] and Gaucher Disease [Citation62]. The arimoclomol effect as a Heat Shock Protein (HSP)-modulating drug (particularly HSP70) makes it suitable as a therapeutic agent in more than one particular LSD. To sum up, at present, a better knowledge of the bases of OCS is a necessary first step towards finding an appropriate therapeutic strategy for these diseases.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

References

  • Opitz JM, Johnson RC, McCreadie SR, et al. The C syndrome of multiple congenital anomalies. Birth Defects Orig Art Series. 1969;2:161–166.
  • Preus M, Alexander WJ, Fraser FC. The C syndrome. Birth Defects Orig Art Series. 1975;11(2):58–62.
  • Oberklaid F, Danks DM. The Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome. A case report. Am J Dis Child. 1975 Nov;129(11):1348–1349.
  • Antley RM, Hwang DS, Theopold W, et al. Further delineation of the C (trigonocephaly) syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1981;9(2):147–163.
  • Lalatta F, Clerici Bagozzi D, Salmoiraghi MG, et al. “C” trigonocephaly syndrome: clinical variability and possibility of surgical treatment. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Dec;37(4):451–456.
  • Stratton RF, Sykes NJ, Hassler TW. C syndrome with apparently normal development. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Dec;37(4):460–462.
  • Zampino G, Di Rocco C, Butera G, et al. Opitz C trigonocephaly syndrome and midline brain anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 1997 Dec 31;73(4):484–488.
  • Bohring A, Silengo M, Lerone M, et al. Severe end of Opitz trigonocephaly (C) syndrome or new syndrome? Am J Med Genet. 1999 Aug 27;85(5):438–446.
  • Opitz JM, Putnam AR, Comstock JM, et al. Mortality and pathological findings in C (Opitz trigonocephaly) syndrome. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):211–231.
  • Flatz SD, Schinzel A, Doehring E, et al. Optiz trigonocephaly syndrome: report of two cases. Eur J Pediatr. 1984 Jan;141(3):183–185.
  • Sargent C, Burn J, Baraitser M, et al. Trigonocephaly and the Opitz C syndrome. J Med Genet. 1985 Feb;22(1):39–45.
  • Fryns JP, Snoeck L, Kleczkowska A, et al. Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome and terminal transverse limb reduction defects. Helv Paediatr Acta. 1985;40(6):485–488.
  • Preus M, Vekemans M, Kaplan P. Diagnosis of chromosome 3 duplication q23—-qter, deletion p25—-pter in a patient with the C (trigonocephaly) syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1986 Apr;23(4):935–943.
  • Camera G, Serra G, Selicorni A. “C” trigonocephaly syndrome: two additional cases. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Dec;37(4):463–464.
  • De Koster J, Legius E, de Zegher F, et al. Opitz C syndrome and pseudohypoaldosteronism. Am J Med Genet. 1990 Dec;37(4):457–459.
  • Haaf T, Hofmann R, Schmid M. Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1991 Sep 15;40(4):444–446.
  • Choudhury AR, Renneberg A, Rackowitz A, et al. [Opitz-trigonocephaly syndrome–a characteristic dysmorphia-retardation syndrome of unclear origin]. Klin Padiatrie. 1992 May-Jun;204(3):171–173.
  • Schaap C, Schrander-Stumpel CT, Fryns JP. Opitz-C syndrome: on the nosology of mental retardation and trigonocephaly. Genet Couns. 1992;3(4):209–215.
  • Chu TW, Teebi AS, Gibson L, et al. FISH diagnosis of partial trisomy 13 and tetrasomy 13 in a patient with severe trigonocephaly (C) phenotype. Am J Med Genet. 1994 Aug 1;52(1):92–96.
  • Glickstein J, Karasik J, Caride DG, et al. “C” trigonocephaly syndrome: report of a child with agenesis of the corpus callosum and tetralogy of Fallot, and review. Am J Med Genet. 1995 Mar 27;56(2):215–218.
  • Sabry MA, Al Saleh Q, Farah S, et al. Another Arab patient with overlap of Varadi-Papp/Opitz trigonocephaly syndromes? Am J Med Genet. 1997 Jan 10;68(1):54–57.
  • Omran H, Hildebrandt F, Korinthenberg R, et al. Probable Opitz trigonocephaly C syndrome with medulloblastoma. Am J Med Genet. 1997 Apr 14;69(4):395–399.
  • McGaughran J, Aftimos S, Oei P. Trisomy of 3pter in a patient with apparent C (trigonocephaly) syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 2000 Oct 2;94(4):311–315.
  • Weber P, Kuwertz-Broking E, Majewski F, et al. Retinitis pigmentosa, terminal renal insufficiency and Caroli syndrome: new associations with Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome. Klin Padiatrie. 2000 Jan-Feb;212(1):31–34.
  • Nacarkucuk E, Okan M, Sarimehmet H, et al. Opitz trigonocephaly C syndrome associated with hearing loss. Pediatr Int. 2003 Dec;45(6):731–733.
  • Czako M, Riegel M, Morava E, et al. Opitz “C” trigonocephaly-like syndrome in a patient with terminal deletion of 2p and partial duplication of 17q. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Dec 15;131(3):310–312.
  • Yatsenko SA, Cheung SW, Scott DA, et al. Deletion 9q34.3 syndrome: genotype-phenotype correlations and an extended deletion in a patient with features of Opitz C trigonocephaly. J Med Genet. 2005 Apr;42(4):328–335.
  • Chinen Y, Kaname T, Yanagi K, et al. Opitz trigonocephaly C syndrome in a boy with a de novo balanced reciprocal translocation t(3;18)(q13.13;q12.1). Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Aug 1;140(15):1655–1657.
  • Kaname T, Yanagi K, Chinen Y, et al. Mutations in CD96, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, cause a form of the C (Opitz trigonocephaly) syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;81(4):835–841.
  • Travan L, Pecile V, Fertz M, et al. Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome presenting with sudden unexplained death in the operating room: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2011;5:222.
  • Pokale Y, Priya B, Vedpathak J, et al. Case report: Opitz C syndrome with a rare chromosomal abnormality. Int J Hum Genet. 2014;14(2):67–71.
  • Urreizti R, Roca-Ayats N, Trepat J, et al. Screening of CD96 and ASXL1 in 11 patients with Opitz C or Bohring-Opitz syndromes. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Jan;170A(1):24–31.
  • Pena-Padilla C, Marshall CR, Walker S, et al. Compound heterozygous mutations in the IFT140 gene cause Opitz trigonocephaly C syndrome in a patient with typical features of a ciliopathy. Clin Genet. 2017 Apr;91(4):640–646.
  • Urreizti R, Cueto-Gonzalez AM, Franco-Valls H, et al. A De Novo nonsense mutation in MAGEL2 in a patient initially diagnosed as Opitz-C: similarities between Schaaf-Yang and Opitz-C syndromes. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 10;7:44138.
  • Urreizti R, Damanti S, Esteve C, et al. A De Novo FOXP1 truncating mutation in a patient originally diagnosed as C syndrome. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 12;8(1):694.
  • Phadphke SR, Patil SJ. Partial trisomy 13 with features similar to C syndrome. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41(6):614–617.
  • de Ravel T, Balikova I, Van Driessche J, et al. “Opitz C syndrome and pseudohypoaldosteronism” is caused by a chromosome 4q deletion. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Jun;149A(6):1315–1316.
  • Kleefstra T, van Zelst-Stams WA, Nillesen WM, et al. Further clinical and molecular delineation of the 9q subtelomeric deletion syndrome supports a major contribution of EHMT1 haploinsufficiency to the core phenotype. J Med Genet. 2009 Sep;46(9):598–606.
  • Say B, Meyer J. Familial trigonocephaly associated with short stature and developmental delay. Am J Dis Child. 1981 Aug;135(8):711–712.
  • Cleper R, Kauschansky A, Varsano I, et al. Varadi syndrome (OFD VI) or Opitz trigonocephaly syndrome: overlapping manifestations in two cousins. Am J Med Genet. 1993 Sep 15;47(4):451–455.
  • David G, Sillence D, Hardwick R, et al. A case of Kabuki (Niikawa-Kuroki) syndrome associated with manifestations resembling C-trigonocephaly syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 1;130A(4):389–392.
  • Russell B, Johnston JJ, Biesecker LG, et al. Clinical management of patients with ASXL1 mutations and Bohring-Opitz syndrome, emphasizing the need for Wilms tumor surveillance. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Apr 29;167:2122–2131.
  • Hoischen A, van Bon BW, Rodriguez-Santiago B, et al. De novo nonsense mutations in ASXL1 cause Bohring-Opitz syndrome. Nat Genet. 2011 Aug;43(8):729–731.
  • Magini P, Della Monica M, Uzielli ML, et al. Two novel patients with Bohring-Opitz syndrome caused by de novo ASXL1 mutations. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Apr;158A(4):917–921.
  • Bainbridge MN, Hu H, Muzny DM, et al. De novo truncating mutations in ASXL3 are associated with a novel clinical phenotype with similarities to Bohring-Opitz syndrome. Genome Med. 2013 Feb 5;5(2):11.
  • Shashi V, Pena LDM, Kim K, et al. De Novo truncating variants in ASXL2 are associated with a unique and recognizable clinical phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Jan 5;100(1):179.
  • Bruel AL, Bigoni S, Kennedy J, et al. Expanding the clinical spectrum of recessive truncating mutations of KLHL7 to a Bohring-Opitz-like phenotype. J Med Genet. 2017 Dec;54(12):830–835.
  • Georgiev H, Ravens I, Papadogianni G, et al. Coming of age: CD96 emerges as modulator of immune responses. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1072.
  • Darlow JM, McKay L, Dobson MG, et al. On the origins of renal cell carcinoma, vesicoureteric reflux and C (Opitz trigonocephaly) syndrome: A complex puzzle revealed by the sequencing of an inherited t(2;3) translocation. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 June;21(Suppl.2. (Abstract)):145.
  • Chan CJ, Martinet L, Gilfillan S, et al. The receptors CD96 and CD226 oppose each other in the regulation of natural killer cell functions. Nat Immunol. 2014 May;15(5):431–438.
  • Schaaf CP, Gonzalez-Garay ML, Xia F, et al. Truncating mutations of MAGEL2 cause Prader-Willi phenotypes and autism. Nat Genet. 2013 Nov;45(11):1405–1408.
  • Mejlachowicz D, Nolent F, Maluenda J, et al. Truncating mutations of MAGEL2, a gene within the Prader-Willi Locus, are responsible for severe arthrogryposis. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Oct 1;97(4):616–620.
  • Jobling R, Stavropoulos DJ, Marshall CR, et al. Chitayat-Hall and Schaaf-Yang syndromes: acommon aetiology: expanding the phenotype of MAGEL2-related disorders. J Med Genet. 2018 May;55(5):316–321.
  • Toriello HV, Colley C, Bamshad M. Update on the Toriello-Carey syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Oct;170(10):2551–2558.
  • McCarthy JM, McCann-Crosby BM, Rech ME, et al. Hormonal, metabolic and skeletal phenotype of Schaaf-Yang syndrome: a comparison to Prader-Willi syndrome. J Med Genet. 2018 May;55(5):307–315.
  • Kim Y, Lee HM, Xiong Y, et al. Targeting the histone methyltransferase G9a activates imprinted genes and improves survival of a mouse model of Prader-Willi syndrome. Nat Med. 2017 Feb;23(2):213–222.
  • Bellacosa A. Developmental disease and cancer: biological and clinical overlaps. Am J Med Genet A. 2013 Nov;161A(11):2788–2796.
  • Daou S, Barbour H, Ahmed O, et al. Monoubiquitination of ASXLs controls the deubiquitinase activity of the tumor suppressor BAP1. Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 22;9(1):4385.
  • De Silva P, Garaud S, Solinas C, et al. FOXP1 negatively regulates tumor infiltrating lymphocyte migration in human breast cancer. EBioMedicine. 2019;39:226–238.
  • Kurthy M, Mogyorosi T, Nagy K, et al. Effect of BRX-220 against peripheral neuropathy and insulin resistance in diabetic rat models. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;967:482–489.
  • Kirkegaard T, Gray J, Priestman DA, et al. Heat shock protein-based therapy as a potential candidate for treating the sphingolipidoses. Sci Transl Med. 2016 Sep 7;8(355):355ra118.
  • Fog CK, Zago P, Malini E, et al. The heat shock protein amplifier arimoclomol improves refolding, maturation and lysosomal activity of glucocerebrosidase. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:142–153.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.