290
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

A randomized study of a method for optimizing adolescent assent to biomedical research

, PhD, , , , &
Pages 189-197 | Published online: 21 Nov 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Voluntary consent/assent with adolescents invited to participate in research raises challenging problems. No studies to date have attempted to manipulate autonomy in relation to assent/consent processes. This study evaluated the effects of an autonomy-enhanced individualized assent/consent procedure embedded within a randomized pediatric asthma clinical trial. Methods: Families were randomly assigned to remain together or separated during a consent/assent process; the latter we characterize as an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure. We hypothesized that separating adolescents from their parents would improve adolescent assent by increasing knowledge and appreciation of the clinical trial and willingness to participate. Results: Sixty-four adolescent–parent dyads completed procedures. The together versus separate randomization made no difference in adolescent or parent willingness to participate. However, significant differences were found in both parent and adolescent knowledge of the asthma clinical trial based on the assent/consent procedure and adolescent age. The separate assent/consent procedure improved knowledge of study risks and benefits for older adolescents and their parents but not for the younger youth or their parents. Regardless of the assent/consent process, younger adolescents had lower comprehension of information associated with the study medication and research risks and benefits, but not study procedures or their research rights and privileges. Conclusions: The use of an autonomy-enhanced assent/consent procedure for adolescents may improve their and their parent's informed assent/consent without impacting research participation decisions. Traditional assent/consent procedures may result in a “diffusion of responsibility” effect between parents and older adolescents, specifically in attending to key information associated with study risks and benefits.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the adolescents with asthma and their parents who participated in this study.

Funding

Supported by National Insitutes of Health (NIH) grant R01HL064677.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board(s) at the Oregon Research Institute and the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center.

Author contributions

Drs. Annett, Brody, Scheer, Turner, Dalen, and Raissy were responsible for the conceptualization, design, and drafting the article. Drs. Dalen and Raissy were responsible for data collection.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.