Abstract
The space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation are important as an electro-hydro-dynamical model to progress the local electric field and ion acoustic waves in plasma, the shallow water wave problems, and also fluid flow of liquid through foam arisen by gravity and capillarity. In this article, we determine new and further general exact wave solutions to the above-mentioned space-time fractional equations using the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method with the assistance of the fractional complex transformation. It is shown that the method is further effective, convenient, and can be used to establish new solutions for other kind non-linear fractional differential equations arising in mathematical physics. Finally, we depict the 3D and 2D figures of the obtained wave solutions in order to interpret them in geometrical sense.
Public Interest Statement
Fractional differential equations have gained much importance and popularity to the researchers. In order for better understanding the complex phenomena, exact solutions play a vital role. It has recently proved to be a valuable tool to the modeling in various fields of mathematical physics, biology, population dynamics, engineering, fluid-dynamic traffic model, etc. The results obtained from the fractional system are of a more general nature. In the present article, we use the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method to investigate closed form wave solutions of the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation. Consequently, we obtain abundant closed form wave solutions of these two equations among them some are new solutions. We expect that the new closed form solutions will be helpful to explain the associated phenomena. Therefore, diverse group of researchers developed and extended different methods for investigating closed form solutions to NLEEs.
1. Introduction
In recent years, non-linear fractional differential equations (NFDEs) have been attracted much interest and it has gained popularity among the researchers. On the other hand, traveling wave solutions of fractional non-linear evolution equations (NLEEs) plays a fundamental and imperative role in mathematical physics, applied sciences and engineering. NFDEs appear in various scientific and engineering fields, such as fluid mechanics, plasma physic, the modeling of earthquake, electricity, quantum mechanics, water wave mechanics, chemical kinematics, optical fibers, biology. There are different types of definitions of fractional derivative such as Jumarie’s modified Riemann–Liouville (Jumarie, Citation2006) derivative, Caputo (Caputo & Fabrizio, Citation2015) derivative are in common. In order to know the inner infrastructure of complex tangible events, exact solutions of NFDEs are very much important. Therefore, at present some useful methods have been established and enhanced for obtaining exact solution to the fractional evolution equations such as, the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method (Akgul, Kilicman, & Inc, Citation2013; Alam & Akbar, Citation2014a, Citation2014b; Bekir & Guner, Citation2013; Bekir & Güner, Citation2014; Younis & Zafar, Citation2014), the modified simple equation method (MSE) (Kaplan, Bekir, Akbulut, & Aksoy, Citation2015; Zayed, Amer, & Al-Nowehy, Citation2016), the exp-function method (El-Borai, El-Sayed, & Al-Masroub, Citation2015; Zheng, Citation2013), the tanh-function method (Ali, Citation2007; Inc, Kilic, Karatas, Al-Qurashi, & Tchier, Citation2016), the sub-equation method (Alzaidy, Citation2013; Guo, Mei, Li, & Sun, Citation2012; Wang & Xu, Citation2014; Zhao, Tang, Kumar, & Hou, Citation2012), the Adomian decomposition method (El-Sayed, Behiry, & Raslan, Citation2010), the ansatz method (Guner & Bekir, Citation2017; Inc, Kılıç, Karataş, & Akgül, Citation2017), the Jacobi elliptic method (Zheng & Feng, Citation2014), the differential transformation method (Momani, Odibat, & Erturk, Citation2007; Rabtah, Erturk, & Momani, Citation2010), the finite element method (Deng, Citation2009), the variational iteration method (Neamaty, Agheli, & Darzi, Citation2015), the Backlund transformation of fractional Riccati equation method (Lu, Citation2012a), the first integral method (Lu, Citation2012b; Younis, Citation2013), the reproducing kernel method (Akgul, Inc, Karatas, & Baleanu, Citation2015; Akgül, Khan, Akgül, Baleanu, & Al Qurashi, Citation2017; Ali, Inc, & Karatas, Citation2015), the MQL-GPS method (Hashemi, Inc, Karatas, & Akgül, Citation2017).
In recent literature, the space and time fractional-coupled Burgers equations (Kurudy, Citation2010) and the space and time fractional foam drainage equation (Hutzler, Weaire, Saugey, Cox, & Peron, Citation2014) is investigated through the modified trial equation method (Bulut, Baskonus, & Pandir, Citation2013), the Adomin decomposition method (Dahmani, Mesmoudi, & Bebbouchi, Citation2008), the tanh-function method (Helal & Mehanna, Citation2007), the variation iteration method (Inc, Citation2008), the exp-function method (Khani, Hamedi-Nezhad, Darvishi, & Ryu, Citation2009), the homotopy perturbation method (Fereidoon, Yaghoobi, & Davoudabadi, Citation2011), the He’s projected differential transform method (Elzaki, Citation2015), the modified Kudryashov method (Ege & Misirli, Citation2014) etc. To the best of our knowledge, the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation have not been investigated by means of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. Therefore, our object is to examine the further general and new exact wave solutions to the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation by making use of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method and study the effect of the included emerging parameters to the obtained solutions and the attained solutions might be useful and realistic to analyze for both the evolution equations. The generalized (G′/G)-expansion method is a recently developed efficient, potential and rising method to search new wave solutions to the non-linear fractional equations. Its finding results are straightforward, more general, efficient, useful, and no need to use the symbolic computation software to manipulate the algebraic equations.
The rest of the article is patterned as follows: In Section 2, we explain the Jumarie’s modified Riemann–Liouville derivative. In Section 3, we describe the outline of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. In Section 4, we search new and further general solutions to the time fractional evolution equations mentioned above. In Section 5, we discuss the results and discussion. In Section 6, we describe the physical explanation and show graphically representation and in Section 7, we draw our conclusions.
2. Modified Riemann–Liouville derivative
The Jumarie’s modified Riemann–Liouville derivative of order α is defined as follows (Jumarie, Citation2006):(2.1) (2.1)
Some properties for the proposed modified Riemann–Liouville derivative are listed below:(2.2) (2.2) (2.3) (2.3) (2.4) (2.4) (2.5) (2.5)
Remark 2.1
In the above formulas, (2.2)–(2.5), and (2.2) is non-differentiable function and the function f(x) is non-differentiable function in (2.3) and (2.4) and differentiable in (2.5), also g(x) is non-differentiable in (2.4), and f(x) is differentiable in (2.4) but non-differentiable in (2.5). In this article, based on the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method, we use formulas (2.3) and (2.5) to obtain the solutions of mentioned fractional differential equations. We will derive effective way for solving fractional partial differential equations. It will be shown that the use of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method permit us to obtain new exact close form solutions from the known seed solutions. In (He, Citation2012; He, Elagan, & Li, Citation2012), He et al. introduced the fractional complex transform to convert an FDE into its differential partner easily.
Hence, above formulae play an important role in fractional calculus and also fractional differential equations.
3. Outline of the method
Let us consider a general non-linear fractional differential equation in the form:(3.1) (3.1)
where u = u(x, t) is wave function, H is a polynomial in u = u(x, t) and its fractional derivatives, containing the highest order derivatives and non-linear terms of the highest order, and subscripts denote fractional derivatives. To obtain the solution of Equation (3.1) using the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method, we have to execute the subsequent steps:
Step 1: Let us consider, and the traveling wave variable,(3.2) (3.2)
permits us to transform the Equation (3.1) into the following ordinary differential equation (ODE):(3.3) (3.3)
where R is a polynomial in and its derivatives, wherein .
Step 2: According to possibility, Equation (3.3) can be integrated term-by-term one or more times, yields constant(s) of integration. The integral constant can be considered as zero since we look for solitary wave solutions.
Step 3: Assume that the wave solution of Equation (3.3) can be written in the form:
(3.4) (3.4)
where either aN or bN maybe zero, but both aN and bN cannot be zero at a time, and and d are arbitrary constants to be evaluated and M(ξ) is given by:(3.5) (3.5)
where satisfies the following auxiliary non-linear ordinary differential equation:(3.6) (3.6)
where the prime stands for derivative with respect to and E are real parameters.
Step 4: The positive integer N arises in Equation (3.3) can be determined by balancing the highest order non-linear terms and the derivatives of highest order appearing in Equation (3.3).
Step 5: Inserting Equations (3.4)–(3.6) into Equation (3.3) with the value of N obtained in Step 4, we attain polynomial in and . Then, we collect each coefficient of the resulted polynomials to zero gives a set of algebraic equations for , d and k.
Step 6: Suppose that the value of the constants , , d and k can be found by solving the algebraic equations obtained in Step 5. Since the general solution of Equation (3.6) is well known to us, putting the values of , , d and k into Equation (3.4), we attain more general type and new exact traveling wave solutions of the non-linear fractional differential Equation (3.1).
Using the general solution of Equation (3.6), we attain the following solutions of Equation (3.5):
Family 1: When and , (3.7) (3.7)
Family 2: When and , (3.8) (3.8)
Family 3: When and, (3.9) (3.9)
Family 4: When and , (3.10) (3.10)
Family 5: When and , (3.11) (3.11)
4. Formulation of the solutions
In this section, we will determine the new and further general useful solutions to the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation.
4.1. The coupled burgers equations
In this sub-section, we determine some new close form traveling wave solutions to the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations by making use of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. Let us consider the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations of the form:
(4.1.1) (4.1.1)
where α, p, and q are emerging parameters. The fractional-coupled Burgers equations are mathematical equations that describe the variation overtime of a physical structure on the fractional fluid mechanics system, ion acoustic waves through a gas-filled pipe, model of turbulent motion and certain steady-state viscous fluid and waves in bubbly liquids. It is also an important equation in financial mathematics. By means of the traveling transformation (3.2), Equation (4.1.1) is converted into the following non-linear ODE:(4.1.2) (4.1.2)
Now, balancing the linear term of the highest order and the non-linear term of the highest order occurring in (4.1.2), yields N1 = N2 = 1. Then the solution of Equation (4.1.2) is the form:(4.1.3) (4.1.3)
where and are arbitrary constants to be determined, such that either a1 or b1 maybe zero, but both a1 and b1 cannot be zero at a time and also either a1 or b1 maybe zero, but both c1 and e1 cannot be zero at a time.
Substituting Equation (4.1.3) together with Equations (3.5) and (3.6) into Equation (4.1.2), the left-hand side is converted into polynomials in and . We collect each coefficient of these resulted polynomials and setting them zero yields a set of simultaneous algebraic equations (for simplicity, the equations are not present here) for and k. Solving these algebraic equations with the help of symbolic computation software, such as Maple, we obtain the following 3 (three) sets of solutions:
Set-1
(4.1.4) (4.1.4)
Set-2(4.1.5) (4.1.5)
Set-3(4.1.6) (4.1.6)
where ψ = A − C, and d are free parameters.
For simplicity, we have discussed only on the solutions Set-1 of the mentioned equations arranged in Equation (4.1.4) as follows and other sets of solutions are omitted here.
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.1.4) into Equation (4.1.3) and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions(4.1.7) (4.1.7)
and(4.1.8) (4.1.8)
where
Since and are integral constants, so we might choose arbitrarily their values. If we choose r1 = 0 but , then the solutions (4.1.7) and (4.1.8) is simplified as:
Again if we choose but , then the solutions (4.1.7) and (4.1.8) is simplified as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.1.4) into Equation (4.1.3) and if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.1.4) into Equation (4.1.3) and if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
But if we choose but , then in this case we get trivial solution, which is not recorded here.
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.1.4) into Equation (4.1.3) and if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.1.4) into Equation (4.1.3) and if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
where .
It is outstanding to notice that the traveling wave solution u1, u2, u3, u4, u5, u6, u7, u8,u9, v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, and v9 of the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and space-time fractional foam drainage equation are fresh and further more general and have not been established in the previous solutions. Obtaining solutions are to be convenient to search the demandable model of waves on the variation overtime of a physical structure on the fractional fluid mechanics system, Sallow water waves, model of turbulent motion, and electro-hydro-dynamical model to progress the local electric field and also ion acoustic waves in plasma.
4.2. The foam drainage equation
In this section, we determine some appropriate close form traveling wave solutions to the space-time fractional foam drainage equation by making use of the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. Let us consider the space-time fractional foam drainage equation of the form:(4.2.1) (4.2.1)
The fractional foam drainage equation is a model of the flow of liquid through the channels and nodes between the bubbles, driven by gravity and capillarity. This equation is also described as the demandable model of waves on shallow water surface, ion acoustic waves in plasma, and the waves on foam maybe explain in terms of a non-linear PDE for the foam density as a function of time and vertical position. It is also an important equation in financial mathematics. By means of the traveling transformation (3.2), Equation (4.2.1) is converted into the following non-linear ODE:
(4.2.2) (4.2.2)
Again we assume a new transformation w = v−1, then Equation (4.2.2) becomes into the following non-linear ODE:(4.2.3) (4.2.3)
Now, balancing the two highest order non-linear terms occurring in (4.2.3), yields . Then the solution of Equation (4.2.3) is the form: (4.2.4) (4.2.4)
where and d are arbitrary constants to be determined, such that either a1 or b1maybe zero, but both a1 and b1cannot be zero at a time.
Substituting Equation (4.2.4) together with Equations (3.5) and (3.6) into Equation (4.2.3), the left-hand side is converted into polynomial in and . We collect each coefficient of these resulted polynomials and setting them zero yields a set of simultaneous algebraic equations (for simplicity, the equations are not present here) for and k. Solving these algebraic equations with the help of symbolic computation software, such as, Maple, we obtain the following three sets of solutions:
Set-1(4.2.5) (4.2.5)
Set-2(4.2.6) (4.2.6)
Set-3(4.2.7) (4.2.7)
where and d are free parameters.
For simplicity, we have discussed only on the solutions Set-1 of the mentioned equation arranged in Equation (4.2.5) as follows and other sets of solutions are omitted here.
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.2.5) into Equation (4.2.4) and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:(4.2.8) (4.2.8)
But when using the result w = v−1, the solution (4.2.8) attain
(4.2.9) (4.2.9)
where .
Since and are integral constants, so we might choose arbitrarily their values. If we choose r1 = 0 but , then the solutions (4.2.9) is simplified as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.2.5) into Equation (4.2.4) and using the result w = v−1 and also if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.2.5) into Equation (4.2.4) and using the result w = v−1 and also if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
But if we choose but , then in this case we get trivial solution, which is not recorded here.
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.2.5) into Equation (4.2.4) and using the result w = v−1 and also if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
When and , substituting the values of the constants arranged in Equation (4.2.5) into Equation (4.2.4) and using the result w = v−1 and also if we choose r1 = 0 but and simplifying, we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
Again if we choose but , then we attained the traveling wave solutions as:
where .
It is remarkable to see that the traveling wave solution w1, w2, w3, w4, w5, w6, w7, w8, and w9 of the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and space-time fractional foam drainage equation are fresh and further more general and have not been established in the previous solutions. Obtaining solutions arise to be convenient to search the demandable model of waves on shallow water surface, the waves of flow of liquid through the channels and nodes between the bubbles, driven by gravity and capillarity, ion acoustic waves in plasma, and the waves on foam density as a function of time and vertical position.
5. Results and discussion
It is very important to point out that our obtained solutions play a significant role over the already published solutions. We notice that, investigated by He’s projected differential transform method (PDTM) (Hutzler et al., Citation2014), Elzaki obtained only two wave solutions (see Appendix A), for space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations. But we have obtained more new wave solutions by used the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method for these equations which have not been reported in the previous literature. Also we have mentioned that investigated by the modified Kudryashov method (Bulut et al., Citation2013), Ege and Misirli obtained only two wave solutions (see Appendix B), for space-time fractional foam drainage equation. But from our mentioned equations, we have obtained more new wave solutions by used the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method which have not been reported in the previous literature.
Hence, comparing between our solutions and their solutions; we declare that our solutions are more general and huge amount of new exact traveling wave solutions.
6. Physical explanation
In this section, we describe the physical explanation and of the graphically representations of the obtained solutions for 3D and 2D figures by means of symbolic software like Mathematica of the non-linear space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and the space-time fractional foam drainage equation as follows:
(1) | Solutions and v7 are the kink-type solutions. Figure shows the shape of the exact kink-type solution as follows. The figures of solution and v7 are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(2) | Solutions and v6 are the singular kink solution. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular kink-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions and v6 are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(3) | Solutions and v7 are the singular kink solution. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular kink-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions and v7 are similar and therefore the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(4) | Solutions and v8 are the singular periodic solution. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular periodic-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions and v8 are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(5) | Solutions and v9 are the singular periodic solution. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular periodic-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions and v9 are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(6) | Solutions u5 and v5 are the singular kink solution. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular king-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions u5 and are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(7) | Solutions are the kink solutions. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular kink-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(8) | Solutions are the kink solutions. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular kink-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(9) | Solutions w3, w4, w8, and w9 are the singular periodic solutions. Figure shows the shape of the exact singular periodic-type solution as follows. The figures of solutions w3, w4, w8, and w9 are similar and therefore, the other figures of these solutions are omitted for convenience. | ||||
(10) | Solution w5 is the singular kink-type solution. Figure shows the shape of the singular king-type solutions as follows. |
7. Conclusion
In this article, we have determined new and further general solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equations and also the space-time fractional foam drainage equation by used the efficient and powerful technique known as the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method. The obtained solutions are in more general forms, and many known solutions to these equations are only special cases of them and definite values of the included parameters give diverse known soliton solutions. We also have shown that the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method over the He’s projected differential transform method (PDTM) and the modified Kudryashov method, offers more general and huge amount of new exact traveling wave solutions with some free parameters. Finally, we have shown graphically to the sense of interpret of the physical phenomena for both the equations. The established results also have shown that the generalized (G′/G)-expansion method is more powerful, effective and can be helped for many other fractional equations to get feasible solutions of the tangible incidents.
Funding
The authors received no direct funding for this research.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
M. Nurul Islam
M. Nurul Islam is a lecturer at the Department Mathematics, Islamic University, Kushtia, Bangladesh. He received his BSc (Honors) and MSc degrees from the Department of Mathematics, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. He is interested in the research field of non-linear differential equations, fluid mechanics, and also in fractional calculus. He has published more than seven research articles. At present, he is working as a PhD student of his fields of interest.
M. Ali Akbar
M. Ali Akbar is a professor at the Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. He received his PhD in Mathematics from the Department of Mathematics, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. He is actively involved in research in the field of non-linear differential equations and fractional calculus. He has published more than 170 research articles of which 65 articles are published in ISI (Thomson Reuter)-indexed journals and other 15 articles published in Scopus-indexed journals.
References
- Akgul, A., Inc, M., Karatas, E., & Baleanu, D. (2015). Numerical solutions of fractional differential equations of Lane-Emden type by an accurate technique. Advances in Difference Equations, 2015(220), 1. doi:10.1186/s13662-0015-0558-8
- Akgul, A., Kilicman, A., & Inc, M. (2013). Improve (G′/G)-expansion method for space and time fractional foam drainage and KdV equations. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, 7, Article ID 414353.
- Akgül, A., Khan, Y., Akgül, E. K., Baleanu, D., & Al Qurashi, M. M. (2017). Solutions of nonlinear systems by reproducing kernel method. The Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications, 10, 4408–4417.10.22436/jnsa
- Alam, M. N., & Akbar, M. A. (2014a). Application of the new approach of generalized (G′/G)-expansion method to find exact solutions of nonlinear PDEs in mathematical physics. BIBECHANA, 10, 58–70.
- Alam, M. N., & Akbar, M. A. (2014b). The new approach of the generalized (G'/G)-expansion method for nonlinear evolution equations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5, 595–603.10.1016/j.asej.2013.12.008
- Ali, A. H. A. (2007). The modified extended tanh-function method for solving coupled MKdV and coupled Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV equations. Physics Letters A, 363(5–6), 420–425.10.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.076
- Ali, A., Inc, M., & Karatas, E. (2015). Useful reproducing kernel functions for solving difference equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series S, 8(1), 1055–1064.
- Alzaidy, J. F. (2013). The fractional sub-equation method and exact analytical solutions for some nonlinear fractional PDEs. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 3, 153–163.10.9734/BJMCS
- Bekir, A., & Guner, O. (2013). Exact solutions of nonlinear fractional differential equation by (G'/G)-expansion method. Chinese Physics B, 22(11), 1–6.
- Bekir, A., & Güner, Ö. (2014). The (G′/G)-expansion method using modified Riemann–Liouville derivative for some space-time fractional differential equations. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5, 959–965.10.1016/j.asej.2014.03.006
- Bulut, H., Baskonus, H. M., & Pandir, Y. (2013). The modified trial equation method for fractional wave equation and time fractional generalized Burgers equation. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013, 1, Article ID 636802.
- Caputo, M., & Fabrizio, M. A. (2015). A new definition of fractional derivatives without singular kernel. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1, 73–85.
- Dahmani, Z., Mesmoudi, M. M., & Bebbouchi, R. (2008). The foam-drainage equation with time and space fractional derivative solved by the ADM method. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, 30, 1–10.
- Deng, W. (2009). Finite element method for the space and time fractional Fokker–Planck equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47(1), 204–226.10.1137/080714130
- Ege, S. M., & Misirli, E. (2014). Solutions of space-time fractional foam drainage equation and the fractional Klein–Gordon equation by use of modified Kudryashov method. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology, 2(3), 384–388.
- El-Borai, M. M., El-Sayed, W. G., & Al-Masroub, R. M. (2015). Exact solutions for time fractional coupled Whitham–Broer–Kaup equations via exp-function method. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(6), 307–315.
- El-Sayed, A. M. A., Behiry, S. H., & Raslan, W. E. (2010). Adomian’s decomposition method for solving an intermediate fractional advection–dispersion equation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 59(5), 1759–1765.10.1016/j.camwa.2009.08.065
- Elzaki, S. M. (2015). Exact solutions of coupled burgers equation with time-and space-fractional derivative. International Journal of Applied Mathematical Research, 4(1), 99–105.10.14419/ijamr.v4i1
- Fereidoon, A., Yaghoobi, H., & Davoudabadi, M. (2011). Application of the homotopy perturbation method for solving the foam drainage equation. International Journal of Differential Equations, 2011, 13, Article ID 864023.
- Guner, O., & Bekir, A. (2017). A novel method for nonlinear fractional differential equations using symbolic computation. Waves in Random and Complex Media, 27(1), 163–170.10.1080/17455030.2016.1213462
- Guo, S., Mei, L., Li, Y., & Sun, Y. (2012). The improved fractional sub-equation method and its applications to the space-time fractional differential equations in fluid mechanics. Physics Letters A, 376, 407–411.
- Hashemi, M. S., Inc, M., Karatas, E., & Akgül, A. (2017). A numerical investigation on Burgers equation by the MQL-GPS method. Journal of Advanced Physics, 6(3), 413–417.10.1166/jap.2017.1357
- He, J. H. (2012). Asymptotic methods for solitary solutions and compacts. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2012. Article ID 916793, 130 p.
- He, J. H., Elagan, S. K., & Li, Z. B. (2012). Geometrical explanation of the fractional complex transform and derivative chain rule for fractional calculus. Physics Letters A, 376(4), 257–259.10.1016/j.physleta.2011.11.030
- Helal, M. A., & Mehanna, M. S. (2007). The tanh method and Adomian decomposition method for solving the foam drainage equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 190(1), 599–609.10.1016/j.amc.2007.01.055
- Hutzler, S., Weaire, D., Saugey, A., Cox, S., & Peron, N. (2014). The Physics of foam drainage. S. J. Cox.
- Inc, M. (2008). The approximate and exact solutions of the space- and time-fractional Burgers equations with initial conditions by variational iteration method. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 345(1), 476–484.10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.04.007
- Inc, M., Kilic, B., Karatas, E., Al-Qurashi, M. M., & Tchier, F. (2016). On soliton solutions of the Wu-Zhang system. Open Physics. doi:10.1515/Phys-2016-0004,14,76-80
- Inc, M., Kılıç, B., Karataş, E., & Akgül, A. (2017). Solitary wave solutions for the Sawada–Kotera equation. Journal of Advanced Physics, 6(2), 288–293.10.1166/jap.2017.1318
- Jumarie, G. (2006). Modified Riemann–Liouville derivative and fractional Taylor series of nondifferentiable functions further results. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 51(9–10), 1367–1376.10.1016/j.camwa.2006.02.001
- Kaplan, M., Bekir, A., Akbulut, A., & Aksoy, E. (2015). The modified simple equation method for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Romanian Journal of Physics, 60(9–10), 1374–1383.
- Khani, F., Hamedi-Nezhad, S., Darvishi, M. T., & Ryu, S. W. (2009). New solitary wave and periodic solutions of the foam drainage equation using the Exp-function method. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 10(3), 1904–1911.10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.02.030
- Kurudy, M. (2010). The approximate and exact solutions of the space and time fractional Burgers equations. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 3(3), 257–263.
- Lu, B. (2012a). Bäcklund transformation of fractional Riccati equation and its applications to nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. Physics Letters A, 376, 2045–2048.10.1016/j.physleta.2012.05.013
- Lu, B. (2012b). The first integral method for some time fractional differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 395, 684–693.
- Momani, S., Odibat, Z., & Erturk, V. S. (2007). Generalized differential transform method for solving a space- and time-fractional diffusion-wave equation. Physics Letters A, 370, 379–387.10.1016/j.physleta.2007.05.083
- Neamaty, A., Agheli, B., & Darzi, R. (2015). Variational iteration method and He’s polynomials for time fractional partial differential equations. Progress in Fractional Differentiation and Applications, 1, 47–55.
- Rabtah, A. A., Erturk, R. S., & Momani, S. (2010). Solutions of a fractional oscillator by using differential transform method. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 59, 1356–1362.10.1016/j.camwa.2009.06.036
- Wang, G. W., & Xu, T. Z. (2014). The modified fractional sub-equation method and its applications to nonlinear fractional partial differential equations. Romanian Journal of Physics, 59(7–8), 636–645.
- Younis, M. (2013). The first integral method for time-space fractional differential equations. Journal of Advanced Physics, 2, 220–223.10.1166/jap.2013.1074
- Younis, M., & Zafar, A. (2014). Exact solutions to nonlinear differential equations of fractional order via (G'/G)-expansion method. Applied Mathematics, 5(1), 1–6.10.4236/am.2014.51001
- Zayed, E. M. E., Amer, Y. A., & Al-Nowehy, A. G. (2016). The modified simple equation method and the multiple exp-function method for solving nonlinear fractional Sharma–Tasso–Olver equation. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series, 32(4), 793–812.10.1007/s10255-016-0590-9
- Zhao, J., Tang, B., Kumar, S., & Hou, Y. (2012). The extended fractional sub-equation method for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 11, Article ID 924956.
- Zheng, B. (2013). Exp-function method for solving fractional partial differential equations. Scientific World Journal. doi:10.1155/2013/465723
- Zheng, B., & Feng, Q. (2014). The Jacobi elliptic equation method for solving fractional partial differential equations. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, 9, Article ID 249071.
Appendix A
Elzaki’s solutions (investigated by the He’s projected differential transform method (PDTM) (Hutzler et al., Citation2014)) for space-time fractional-coupled Burgers equation are as follows:(A) (A)
Appendix B
Ege and Misirli’s solutions (investigated by the modified Kudryashov method (Bulut et al., Citation2013)) for space-time fractional foam drainage equation are as follows:(B.1) (B.1)
and(B.2) (B.2)