Abstract
Total polyphenol, antioxidant activity, and heavy metal contents in selected Ethiopian beers (Dashen= B1, Harar = B2, Habesha= B3, Saint George= B4, and Walya= B5) were investigated. The average concentration of total phenolic content in B1, B2, B3, B4, and B5 were found to be 219.80, 206.09, 190.24, 193.00, and 212.10 mg GAE/L, respectively. The obtained results showed that B1 contained significantly highest total polyphenol content (219.80±2.83 mg/L) and showed the highest radical scavenging capacities (84.16±0.65). According to Pearson’s correlation between polyphenol extract with antioxidant activities, suggested that phenolic compound in beer were contributor to antioxidant activity. Similarly, all the beer samples were analyzed for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The total metal concentrations of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb were found to be in the range of (ND–0.022 mg/L), (0.02 −0.041), (0.023-0.054), (ND-0.064), and (ND-0.022 mg/L), respectively. The efficiency of the procedure was validated by spiking and the percent recovery of the metals varied from 90.9 to 104.3%.
Keywords:
PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT
The growth of Ethiopian population has got an increase in the consumption beer from time to time. This leads to beer market competition throughout the country as the consumer beer brand preference gets improved. Beer contains a variety of polyphenols which can be important for its chemical stability and shelf life. The ingredients hops, malt, and water; and brewing processes are the sources of naturally occurring antioxidant compounds and trace metals. Recently, consumers are paying their attention toward the importance of dietary antioxidant components for the betterment of human health. There is, however, very limited or no published information on the total polyphenol content, antioxidant activities, and levels of metals of Ethiopian beers. This work investigated the total polyphenol content, antioxidant activities, and levels of metals. The results showed that Ethiopian Beers could be considered as potential sources of phenols that have got promising potential antioxidant activities. The levels of metals in beers were also found under maximum permissible limit given many countries.
1. Introduction
Beer is the third most popular beverage in the world next to tea and water (Granato et al., Citation2010). In recent decades, beer consumption has been steadily increasing even in countries where alcoholic beverages are not traditional. Since beer is brewed from water, yeast, malt, and hops, beer contains a broad range of different chemical components that may react and interact at all stages of the brewing process (Cukalovic et al., Citation2010). Beers consumed in Ethiopia are produced locally from barely and are sold in restaurants, bars, and shops, or served at as festivals, funerals, weddings, and marriage ceremonies.
As long as beer is consumed moderately in responsible manner, it can have significant effect on human health as a source of essential vitamins (B2, B6, and B12), carbohydrates, amino acids, phenolic compounds, and minerals (Dordovic et al., Citation2016). Phenolic compounds are widely and naturally abundant in fruits, vegetables, and cereal crops. Many studies have shown that regular consumption of foods and beverages abundant in polyphenols have antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antitumor activities and prevent diseases related to aging (Eblinger, Citation2009). In beverages, polyphenols arise from the raw materials such as malt and hops during brewing process, which plays a key role in antioxidant activity and they can also influence the flavor, color, and sensory stability of the beer (Jurich et al., Citation2015; Zhao et al., Citation2010).
The concentrations of inorganic components may vary depending on raw materials, brewing processes, equipment, bottling, and adulteration. Application of pesticides, fungicides, and fertilizers containing metals like Cd, Cu, and Pb in crops also increase the amounts of metals in beverages (Ahring et al., Citation2008). Depending on the types and levels, metals may be essential or toxic to human body and can also affect the brewing process and beer quality such as taste, appearance, product stability, and haze formation. Identifying the content of metal in beer is considered as valuable for differentiation, classification of beer and essential issue for consumer safety in order to develop effective and efficient risk communication channels in the brewery industry (Harmanescu et al., Citation2006; Siqueira et al., Citation2011). Labels in most beer products do not provide information on the mineral content and acceptable concentration of specific elements, and there is no obligation to inform customers about the levels of the elements. In Ethiopia, limited studies were carried out on the total polyphenol, antioxidant activities, and mineral contents of beers produced and consumed in Ethiopia.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the total polyphenol, antioxidant activities, and levels of metals in Ethiopian commercial beers.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Sampling
For this study, five Ethiopian commercial beers (Dashen= B1, Harar = B2, Habesha= B3, Saint George= B4, and Walya= B5) originated from various producers were chosen. A total of 60 bottled beers (12 from each brand) were randomly purchased in different Hotels and Groceries from Gondar Town and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C till further analysis.
2.2. Chemicals DPPH
All chemicals used in this study were all analytical grade unless otherwise stated. The chemicals that were used for this study are carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC, Aldrich, USA), ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid disodium salt dehydrate (Aldrich, USA), ammonium iron citrate reagents (Aldrich, USA), ammonia reagent (Neolab, USA), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), HNO3(Blulux, India), calred indicator, H2O2 (Carel Abmed, India), standards of Pb, Cd, and Ni (Loba Chemie, India) and Cr and Cu (Blulux, India). Standard solutions of elements were used for calibration were prepared by diluting 1000 mg/L of stock solutions of each element by deionized water.
2.3. Instruments
The instruments used in this study were turbidity meter (Type Vos Rota), density meter (DMA 4500), pH meter (Metler Toledo), Hazimeter cuvette, and UV-VIS spectrophotometer (thermo scientific model Evolution 201, USA), flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (Buck Scientific Model 210 VGP, USA) equipped with deuterium arc background corrector and standard air-acetylene flame system.
2.4. Determination of total polyphenols
The total polyphenol content of commercial beers were determined by using EBC method. Briefly, 10 mL of degassed beer and 8 mL of CMC/EDTA reagent were added to 50 mL volumetric flask with stopper and thoroughly mixed. Then, 0.5 mL of ferric reagent (ammonium iron citrate) was added to the sample and homogenized. Then after, 0.5 mL of ammonia were added to the solution and mixed again. Finally, distilled water was added and then the sample solution was allowed to stand for 10 min. The absorbance was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 600 nm (European Brewery Convention, Analytical-EBC, Citation2004).
2.5. Determination of antioxidant activity
DPPH scavenging activity of beer was determined according to the method described by Zhao et al. Citation2010 with minor modification. Briefly, 0.5 mL of diluted beer was mixed with 2.5 mL of 1 mM DPPH in methanol and the mixture was allowed to stand for an incubation time of 1 h at room temperature. The blank sample was run in the same conditions as the beer samples. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Harmanescu et al., Citation2006). The radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
where Ao is the absorbance of blank and As is the absorbance of sample. The measurements were performed in triplicate.
2.6. Determination of metals
In order to select an optimum procedure for digestion, reagent volume, digestion temperature, and digestion time were optimized on varying one parameter by keeping other parameters constant until clear and colorless solution was obtained. The procedure which consumed minimum reagent volume at lower temperature and shorter digestion time was chosen as optimal procedure. To determine the concentration of metals, 10 mL of degassed beer and various volumes of HNO3 and H2O2 were added into round-bottomed flask and digested at different digestion time and temperature. After digestion was completed, the solution was cooled and filtered through Whatman No. 42 filter paper and diluted with deionized water. Finally, it was kept in refrigerator until analysis. Digestion of a reagent blank was also performed following similar digestion procedure as that of the sample (Mulugeta & Gashaw, Citation2017).
Finally, 3 mL of HNO3 and 4 mL of H2O2 at a temperature of 150oC for 50 min were chosen as the optimal digested procedure for determination of the concentration of metals in beer samples. For flame atomic absorption spectroscopy measurements, acetylene was used as inert gas. The operating parameters for the determination of metals were given in Table .
2.7. Data analysis
Physico-chemical properties and levels of trace metals in beer were expressed as mean ± SD and one-way ANOVA was employed to examine the statistical significance of elements concentration in beer samples at 95% confident interval. The quantifications and statistical analysis were done with IBM SPSS Statistical software Version 20. Pearson correlation coefficients were applied to investigate the correlations between total phenolic content and antioxidant capacities.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Physicochemical analysis
The physicochemical properties of Ethiopian commercial beers are described in the Table . The value of AE was ranged from 1.74 to 2.51oP and generally found in the order of B5 > B2> B4 > B1 > B3. The highest AE value may be related to the presence of unfermented sugars (oligosaccharides) by yeasts, while the least AE value was due to fermentation of lower molecular weight sugars present in the wort like glucose, fructose, and maltose basically come from the malt. Similarly, B5 showed the highest RE value, followed by B2, B4, B1, and B3. Among the investigated beers, B2 displayed the highest OE value (11.28 0P), while B4 was the least (10.74 0P), this attributed to the quality and amount of malt used; and the nature of brewing process used for beer production (Briggs & Boulton, Citation2004)
The maximum value of ADF and RDF were observed in B3, whereas the least amount were found in beer sample B5 and B4, respectively (Table ). The highest RDF indicates that the extract originally present in the wort was converted into ethanol and CO2 in better degree than the one which contained least RDF value (European Brewery Convention, Analytical-EBC, Citation2004).
The alcoholic (ethanol) content was found in the range of 4.58 to 4.88 (%, v/v), the highest alcoholic content was found in B2 and the least one was in B4. The results of this investigation are consistent with researches carried out by Pai et al. (Citation2015), Mitic et al. (Citation2014). The difference in alcoholic content among all beer samples may be attributed to the difference in brewing temperature, yeast cell count, aeration, composition of wort (i.e. amount of original extract, pH, dissolved oxygen, metals, etc.) (Kunze & Manger, Citation2004). Many studies demonstrated that the alcoholic content of most beers were found in the range of 3%–6% (v/v) (Pai et al., Citation2015).
The pH of the beer samples ranged from 4.20 to 4.38. B4 was the most acidic among all the beer samples, while B1 was the least acidic. The variation attributed to the difference in raw material used, water and the amount of acid added in the mashing step. The pH of a beer strongly influences physiological parameters such color, odor, taste, biological, and chemical stability of beer. The pH range of beers identified in this study are consistent with previous reports (Pai et al., Citation2015).
On the other hand, the haziness of this study followed the order B3 > B1 > B4> B2 > B5, this attributed to residual starch, oxalate from calcium deficient worts, carbohydrate, and protein from autolyzed yeast, lubricants from can lids, and dead bacteria from malt (Steiner et al., Citation2010).Concerning bitterness, B2 had the highest bitter with a value of 27.68 IBU, while B4 had the least bitter with a value of 14.76 IBU. This difference is due to variation in the type and amount of hope added in the brewing process. The physicochemical properties Ethiopian commercial beers that was studied here are in agreement with other reports (Koren et al., Citation2017; Pai et al., Citation2015; Yin et al., Citation2016).
3.2. Total polyphenols content
Phenolic compounds play critical roles in both flavor and colloidal stability of beer (Zhao et al., Citation2010). The total phenolic contents of beer depend on the raw materials for brewing mainly malt and hop; and the type of beer produced (Jurich et al., Citation2015). Studies showed that beers with high phenolic content showed better quality, more stable sensory properties, and longer shelf life than beers with low phenolic content (Mitic et al., Citation2014; Zujko & Witkowska, Citation2014).
As shown in Table , the total phenolic content significantly varied with the type of beer, which ranged from 190.24 to 219.8 mg/L, of which B1 contained highest amount of total phenolic content and B3 the least total phenolic content (190.24±5.63 mg/L). The result indicated that significant differences were observed (p < 0.05) on total phenolic content in all analyzed beer samples except between B3 and B4 (p > 0.05). The amount of TPC variation comes from the difference in raw material used mainly from malt and hope and the nature of beer production process (Ditrych et al., Citation2015; Jorkova et al., Citation2012).The results obtained in this study were in agreement with reported values (Ditrych et al., Citation2015; Granato et al., Citation2010; Jurich et al., Citation2015; Zhao et al., Citation2010).
So, the difference in amount of total polyphenols can cause difference on their antioxidant activities, flavor, color, and sensory properties and also may contribute to maintain the endogenous redox balance in humans (Siqueira et al., Citation2011).
3.3. Antioxidant activity
The values of antioxidant activity for the analyzed beers was expressed as percent of inhibition (Table ). Among the beers, B1 had significantly (p<0.05) highest percent of inhibition (84.16%), whereas B3 had the least percent of inhibition with a value of 72.7%. Like with the total polyphenol content, the antioxidant activity of Ethiopian commercial can be ranked as follows: B1 > B5 > B2 > B4 > B3, attributed to the difference in the amount of raw materials and brewing process. A beer that had greater DPPH radical scavenging activity could have enhanced flavor stability because beer staling can occur as a result of the formation of trans-2-nonenal and other saturated and unsaturated aldehydes as a result of oxidation (Pai et al., Citation2015). The antioxidant activity of Ethiopian beers are found to be in agreement with studies reported in literature (Granato et al., Citation2010; Jorkova et al., Citation2012; Koren et al., Citation2017; Pai et al., Citation2015).
As shown in Table , the total phenolic content of beers showed positive correlations with the antioxidant capacities of the beers analyzed. This indicating that total phenolic content could be used as an indicator in evaluating the antioxidant capacity of beers which may preliminarily applied as natural sources of antioxidant functional beverages (Mastura et al., Citation2017).
3.4. Levels of metals
The efficiency of the analytical method that used to determine the levels of each metal in commercial beers was validated through linearity, recovery, precision, and limit of detection. The validated data of the methods are presented in Table . The correlation coefficients of the calibration curves of the analyzed metals were found above 0.9979.
The recovery test was performed for the analysis of metals in beer samples through spiking experiments, in which known volumes of standard solutions of elements of interest were added in to beer samples. The spiked samples were digested following the same procedures as utilized for digesting the beer samples. As shown in Table , the percentage recovery were 99.2±5.4%, 90.9±8.9%, 95.2±10.5%, 96.5±8.7, and 104.3±9.1% for Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb, respectively. The recovery results indicated that the method was applicable for determining the levels of metals in beer samples.
The limit of detection (LOD) was obtained from three times its standard deviation of the blank signals divided by the slope of the calibration equation, whereas limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated by multiplying LOD by a factor of three (Malede et al., Citation2020) and the values for LOD and LOQ of all studied elements are given in Table .
As shown in Table , Cd was only detected in B2, B3, and B4, whereas in B1 and B5 it was under the limit of detection of the method applied.
The trend of Cr concentration (mg/L) in beers was B3 (0.47±0.002) > B5 (0.23±0.004) > B4 (0.05±0.001) > B2 (0.035±0.002) > B1 (0.023±0.001). Cr levels in beers have been reported in the range of 0.0256-0.4417 mg/L (Voica et al., Citation2015) and 0.17–0.34 mg/L (Izah et al., Citation2017), which suggest that the values obtained in this study are within range reported in literatures.
Copper content of beers ranged between 0.020 and 0.041 mg/L. B4 had the highest level (0.041 ± mg/L) of Cu, while B1 had the smallest level (0.020 ± mg/L) of Cu. This is within ranges of beer studies by Voica et al. (Citation2015) and Izah et al. (Citation2017) who reported a range of 0.0259-0.736 mg/L and 0.04–0.08 mg/L, respectively.
The overall concentration of Ni ranged from 0.026 to 0.064 mg/L, the highest being from B4 and the lowest from B3. However, Ni metal were found to below detection limit in B1 and B2. Of all the studied beers, B2 and B4 were contained highest values of Ni. These results were in agreement with reported by Voica et al. (Citation2015). Lead metal was detected only in B3, B4, and B5. However, Pb was found below of detectable limit in B1 and B2. These results are comparable with the results reported by Izah et al. (Citation2017) and Voica et al. (Citation2015).
In general, Cu was found to be highest in B1, B3, and B5, while Ni was the highest among other metals in B2 and B4. However, lead was the least detected.
4. Conclusion
The results of the present study indicated that the Ethiopian beers contained substantial amount of phenolics contents and correspondingly exhibited high antioxidant activity. The average content of total polyphenol and antioxidant activities were represented in the order of B3<B4<B2<B5<B1. Therefore, beer can be used as an important source of polyphenols. The Pearson correlation analysis revealed that the TPC showed strong positive correlations with DPPH radical scavenging activity.
Depending on the concentration, metals may be essential or toxic to human body for health with a profound effect on well-being. Metals compositions in beer are important for yeast growth and influence yeast metabolism and also advantageous to the consumers. In the present study, heavy metal concentrations in Ethiopian beers showed considerable variations. Highest amounts of Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb were investigated in B4. However, B2 contained highest amount of Cd. Generally, Cu showed the highest mean value, followed by Ni, Cr, Pb, and Cd.
The results obtained in this study are in agreement with data reported in literature and all the beer samples analyzed were found to be good potential sources in minerals.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Molla Tefera
Dr. Molla Tefera (First author) is an assistant professor in analytical chemistry at the University of Gondar, Chemistry Department, Ethiopia. He has published over 10 articles in reputable journals and his research lines primarily on electrochemical method of developing sensors for the determination of electroactive substances in food, environment and pharmaceuticals. Besides, he is working on bioactive characteristics and develops analytical methods for assessment of the level and removal methods of selected pollutants like metals, pesticides, and aflatoxins in food and environmental samples.
References
- Ahring, S., Decker, F., Robert, S., & Andersson, T. (2008). Chill-haze-Identification and determination of haze-active constituents by HPLC and Mass Spectrometry. Brewing Science, 5, 32–9.
- Briggs, D., & Boulton, C. A. (2004). Brookes and Stevens: Brewing science and practice (1st ed.). England: Woodhead. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203024195
- Cukalovic, I., Despotovic, S., Nedovic, V., Lakic, N., & Nicksic, M. (2010). New type of beer-Beer with Improved Functionality and defined pharmacodynamics properties. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 48, 384–391.
- Ditrych, M., Kordialik-Bogacka, E., & Czyzowska, A. (2015). Antiradical and Reducing Potential of Commercial Beers. Czech Journal of Food Science, 33, 261–266. https://doi.org/10.17221/658/2014-CJFS
- Dordovic, S., Popovic, D., Despotovic, S., Veljovic, M., Atanackovic, M., Cvejic, J., Nedovic, V., & Cukalovic, I. (2016). Extracts of medicinal plants as functional beer additives. Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly, 22, 301–308. https://doi.org/10.2298/CICEQ150501044D
- Eblinger, H. (2009). Handbook of Brewing (1st ed.). Wiley-VCH.
- European Brewery Convention, Analytical-EBC. (2004). Extract of Malt: Congress Mash. Hans Carl Getranke-Fachverlag.
- Granato, D., Branco, G., Fariab, J., & Cruzb, A. (2010). Characterization of Brazilian lager and brown ale beers based on color, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity using chemometrics. Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 91, 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4222
- Harmanescu, M., Gergen, I., & Isengard, H. (2006). Correlation between total antioxidant capacity and polyphenols content for some beer types. Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies, 12, 371–376.
- Izah, S., Inyang, I., Angaye, T., & Okowa, I. (2017). A Review of Heavy Metal Concentration and Potential Health Implications of Beverages Consumed in Nigeria. Toxics, 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics5010001
- Jorkova, M., Horak, T., Haskova, D., Culic, J., Cejka, P., & Kellner, V. (2012). Control of antioxidant beer activity by the mashing process. Journal of Institute of Brewery, 118, 230–235. http://doi.org/10.1002/jib.35
- Jurich, A., Coric, N., Odak, A., Herceg, Z., & Tisma, M. (2015). Analysis of total polyphenols, bitterness and haze in pale and dark lager beer produced under different mashing and boiling conditions. Journal of Institute of Brewery, 121, 541–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.254
- Koren, D., Orban, C., Gallo, N., Kun, S., Vecseri-Hegyes, B., & Kun-Farkas, G. (2017). Folic acid content and antioxidant activity of different types of beers available in Hungarian retail. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54, 1158–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2503-1
- Kunze, W., & Manger, H. (2004). Technology brewing and malting (3rd ed.). VLB-Berlin.
- Malede, M., Molla, T., & Bewketu, M. (2020). Trace metals in the leaves of selected plants used to treat hepatitis in Dembia, Ethiopia. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, 26, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496475.2019.1682741
- Mastura, H., Hasnah, H., & Dang, T. (2017). Total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of beans: organic vs inorganic. International Food Research Journal, 24, 510–517.
- Mitic, S., Paunovic, D., Pavlovic, A., Tosic, S., Stojkovic, M., & Mitic, M. (2014). Phenolic Profiles and Total Antioxidant Capacity of Marketed Beers in Serbia. International Journal of Food Properties, 17(4), 908–922. http://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2012.680223
- Mulugeta, M., & Gashaw, T. (2017). Determination of Selected Essential and Non-Essential Elements in Different Beer Brands of Ethiopia. Food Science and Quality Management, 69, 6–11.
- Pai, T., Sawant, S., Ghatak, A., Chaturvedi, P., Gupte, A., & Desai, N. (2015). Characterization of Indian beers: chemical composition and antioxidant potential. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(3), 1414–1423. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1152-2
- Siqueira, P., Bolini, H., & Macedo, G. (2011). Polyphenols and antioxidant properties in forced and naturally aged Brazilian beer. Journal of Brewery and Distilling, 2, 45–50.
- Steiner, E., Becker, T., & Gastl, M. (2010). Turbidity and Haze Formation in Beer – Insights and Overview. Journal of Institute of Brewery, 116(4), 360–368. http://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.2010.tb00787.x
- Voica, C., Magdas, D., & Feher, I. (2015). Metal Content and Stable Isotope Determination in Some Commercial Beers from Romanian Markets. Journal of Chemistry, 2015, 1–11. http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/192032
- Yin, H., Dong, J., Yu, J., Chang, Z., Qia, Z., Liu, M., Huang, S., Hu, X., Liu, X., Deng, Y., & Wang, D. (2016). A preliminary study about the influence of high hydrostatic pressure processing on the physicochemical and sensorial properties of a cloudy wheat beer. Journal of Institute of Brewery, 122(3), 462–467. http://doi.org/10.1002/jib.344
- Zhao, H., Chen, W., Lu, J., & Zhao, M. (2010). Phenolic profiles and antioxidant activities of commercial beers. Food Chemistry, 119(3), 1150–1158. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.08.028
- Zujko, M., & Witkowska, A. (2014). Antioxidant Potential and Polyphenol Content of Beverages, Chocolates, Nuts, and Seeds. International Journal of Food Properties, 17(1), 86–92. http://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2011.614984