385
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Reports

Clinical significance of follow-up blood culture in patients with a single Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood culture

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 207-212 | Received 03 Sep 2019, Accepted 26 Nov 2019, Published online: 13 Dec 2019
 

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the frequency of a positive result in follow-up blood cultures (FUBCs) and clinical outcome when FUBCs were not performed, in patients with a single Staphylococcus aureus-positive blood culture.

Methods: We analyzed blood culture results in a prospective, observational cohort of patients with S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) at a tertiary-care hospital. All adult patients with only a single positive blood culture set from at least two blood culture sets drawn at the initial SAB episode were enrolled in the study. We analyzed FUBC results performed within 5 days after bacteraemia onset and compared the characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without FUBCs.

Results: Of 305 patients with a single S. aureus-positive blood culture, FUBCs were obtained in 274 (90%) and were positive in 15% (42/274), of whom 50% were afebrile. The rate of positivity of FUBCs was significantly higher in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) than in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (19% versus 9%, p = .03). In 190 patients with a single MRSA-positive blood culture, the demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between patients with and without FUBCs (167 versus 23). Although mortality was comparable between the two groups, relapse of SAB was significantly more frequent in patients in whom FUBCs were not performed (17% versus 2%, p = .008).

Conclusions: Even if a patient has a single S. aureus-positive blood culture and no fever, FUBCs should be performed to manage the infection properly and to prevent SAB relapse.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Mi Young Kim, Jang Mi Go, and Kyung-Mi Bang for supporting the data collection.

Disclosure statement

There are no potential conflicts of interest for any authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Programme through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education [grant number: NRF-2017R1D1A1A09000920].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.