541
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete mitogenome of Lycostomus sp. (Elateroidea: Lycidae)

, , , &
Pages 3813-3815 | Received 19 Sep 2019, Accepted 13 Oct 2019, Published online: 26 Oct 2019

Abstract

The complete mitochondrial genome of a net-winged beetle was sequenced, Lycostomus sp. (Coleoptera: Lycidae). The total length of this mitogenome is 16096 bp and the composition of each base is A (41.1%), T (31.9%), C (17.1%), G (9.9%), respectively. The gene arrangement of this beetle mt genome is the same as other insects. The phylogenetic tree shows that Lycostomus sp. is closest to Platerodrilus sp. with robust statistical support, which confirms the monophyly of Lycidae.

The genus Lycostomus Motschulsky, 1861 belongs to the family Lycidae Laporte, 1836. Over one hundred species are included in this genus and widely distributed in the Oriental and Holoarctic regions (Kleine Citation1933; Bocákova and Bocák Citation2007). The adults could be easily differentiated from others by the elongate head which prolonged before the eyes to form a rostrum probably to facilitate feeding on deep-seated nectaria (Kazantsev Citation2005). Besides, pronotum is present with median longitudinal carina in anterior part, pronotal margins are explanate along the edge; elytra are slightly to moderately widened posteriorly, each elytron has four longitudinal costae, but recticulate costae are reduced, irregular; male genitalia is equipped with slender aedeagus, short paramere, which is rarely reaching half of the phallic length; female genitalia has extensive plate-like coxites and separated and slender paraproctal baculi (Bocák and Bocákova Citation2008). Up to now, only one complete mitogenome of lycid species is available at GenBank.

Here, the second complete mitochondrial genome for Lycidae was sequenced with Lycostomus sp. chosen as the representative. The specimens used in this study were collected from Hongping Forestry, 31°36′24″N, 110°25′02″E, Shennongjia, Hubei Province, China and deposited in the Museum of Hebei University, Baoding, China (MHBU, accession number CAN0014). Genomic DNA was extracted by DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Germany). Illumina TruSeq libraries were prepared using genomic DNA with an average insert size of 450 bp and were sequenced on the Illumina Hiseq2500 platform with 250 bp paired-end reads at BerryGenomics (Beijing, China). The sequence reads were first filtered by the programs following Zhou et al. (Citation2013) and then the remaining high-quality reads were assembled using IDBA-UD (Yu and Henry Citation2012). In order to study the accuracy of assembly, Geneious 2019.2 was used to map clean reading onto the mt genome sequence. The annotations of genes were done by Geneious 2019.2 software and tRNAscan-SE 1.21 (Schattner et al. Citation2005). The annotated sequence was registered in GenBank with accession number MN264644.

Like most animals (Gissi et al. Citation2008), the mitogenome of Lycostomus sp. encodes for 37 genes. The structure and compositions of the mitogenome are similar to Platerodrilus sp. (Lycidae) and other closely related beetles (e.g. Sheffield et al. Citation2008). It is a double-stranded circular molecule of 16,096 bp in length, which contains 22 tRNA genes, 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 rRNA subunits, and an AT-rich region as in other insects. The composition of each base was calculated as A (41.4%), T (31.9%), C (17.1%), G (9.9%), and GC content was 27%. The overall A + T composition was relatively high (73%), as Platerodrilus sp. (76.2%) and other species are included in Elateroidea. The start codon of ND1 was abnormal TTG. ATN codon was used in other 12 PCGs. TAA or TAG was used as terminal codon, except an incomplete terminal codon, namely AA was found in COX2, COX3, ND4, and ND5.

The newly determined mitogenome sequence was aligned by the Tran Align methods (Bininda-Emonds Citation2005) with orthologous sequences corresponding to complete mitogenomes available in GenBank for Elateroidea (13 species) and closely related Dryopidae (1 species) and Buprestidae (1 species) as outgroup. These species were as follows: Chauliognathus opacus (Sheffield et al. Citation2009), Platerodrilus sp. (Uribe and Gutiérrez-Rodríguez Citation2016), Rhagophthalmus ohbai (Li et al. Citation2007), Brasilocerus sp., Hapsodrilus igniferand Bicellonychia lividipennis and Hapsodrilus ignifer (Amaral et al. Citation2016), Melanotus villosus (Linard et al. Citation2016), Anostirus castaneus, Adrastus rachifer, and Lampyris noctiluca (Linard et al. Citation2018), Aquatica leii (Jiao et al. Citation2013), Limonius californicus (Gerritsen et al. Citation2016), Cerophtidae sp., Dryops ernesti and Chrysochroa fulgidissima (Hong et al. Citation2009). The aligned data were concatenated with Sequence Matrix v.1.7.8 (Vaidya et al. Citation2011). Data were partitioned according to loci of 13 PCGs. The neighbor-joining tree was constructed by MEGA 7.0 with 1500 bootstrap replicates, based on Kimure-2 parameter model. The bootstrap showed sufficient value at all nodes. The reconstructed phylogenetic tree shows that Lycostomus sp. is closest to Platerodrilus sp. with robust statistical support (), which suggests that Lycidae is recovered as a monophyletic group. However, within the superfamily Elateroidea, the phylogenetic relationships among families remain unresolved as in other studies (e.g. Timmermans et al. Citation2016).

Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of 16 species of Elateroidea, Dryopidae, and Buprestidae based on 13 PCGs of mitochondrial genome sequence.

Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree of 16 species of Elateroidea, Dryopidae, and Buprestidae based on 13 PCGs of mitochondrial genome sequence.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The present study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos. 31772507, 41401064], the Knowledge Innovation of Chinese Academy of Sciences [No. KSCX2-EW-Z-8], Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [C201720112] and a foundation for young talents of colleges and universities in Hebei Province [BJ2017030].

References

  • Amaral DT, Mitani Y, Ohmiya Y, Viviani VR. 2016. Organization and comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of bioluminescent Elateroidea (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Gene. 586:254–262.
  • Bininda-Emonds O. 2005. Trans Align: using amino acids to facilitate the multiple alignment of protein-coding DNA sequences. BMC Bioinf. 6:156.
  • Bocák L, Bocákova M. 2008. Phylogeny and classification of the family Lycidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Annal Zoologici. 58:695–720.
  • Bocákova M, Bocák L. 2007. Lycidae. In: Löbl I, Smetana A, editors. Catalogue of palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol 4. Stenstrup: Apollo Books; pp. 211–224, 935.
  • Gerritsen AT, New DD, Robison BD, Rashed A, Hohenlohe P, Forney L, Rashidi M, Wilson CM, Settles ML. 2016. Full mitochondrial genome sequence of the sugar beet wireworm, Limonius californicus (Coleoptera: Elateridae), a common agricultural pest. Genome Announc. 4:e01628–15.
  • Gissi C, Iannelli F, Pesole G. 2008. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity. 101:301–320.
  • Hong MY, Jeong HC, Kim MJ, Jeong HU, Lee SH, Kim I. 2009. Complete mitogenome sequence of the jewel beetle, Chrysochroa fulgidissima (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Mitochondr DNA. 20:46–60.
  • Jiao H-W, Ding M-H, Zhao H-B. 2013. Sequence and organization of complete mitochondrial genome of the firefly, Aquatica leii (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Mitochondr DNA. 26:775–776.
  • Kazantsev SV. 2005. Morphology of Lycidae with some consideration of the Coleoptera. Elytron. 3:73–248.
  • Kleine R. 1933. Coleopterorum Catalogus auspiciis et auxilio W. Junk editus a S. Schenkling, Pars 128: Lycidae. Berlin: W. Junk; pp. 145.
  • Li XY, Ogoh K, Ohba N, Liang XC, Ohmiya Y. 2007. Mitochondrial genomes of two luminous beetles, Rhagophthalmus lufengensis and R. ohbai (Arthropoda, Insecta, Coleoptera). Gene. 392:196–205.
  • Linard B, Arribas P, Andújar C, Crampton-Platt A, Vogler AP. 2016. Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol. Mol Ecol Resour. 16:1365–1377.
  • Linard B, Crampton-Platt A, Moriniere J, Timmermans M, Andújar C, Arribas P, Miller KE, Lipecki J, Favreau E, Hunter A, et al. 2018. The contribution of mitochondrial metagenomics to large-scale data mining and phylogenetic analysis of Coleoptera. Mol Phylogen Evol. 128:1–11.
  • Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. 2005. The tRNA scan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:686–689.
  • Sheffield NC, Song H, Cameron SL, Whiting MF. 2008. A comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in Coleoptera (Arthropoda: Insecta) and genome descriptions of six new beetles. Mol Biol Evol. 25:2499–2509.
  • Sheffield NC, Song H, Cameron SL, Whiting MF. 2009. Nonstationary evolution and compositional heterogeneity in beetle mitochondrial phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 58:381–394.
  • Timmermans M, Barton C, Haran J, Ahrens D, Culverwell CL, Ollikainen A, Dodsworth S, Foster PG, Bocak L, Vogler AP. 2016. Family-level sampling of mitochondrial genomes in Coleoptera: compositional heterogeneity and phylogenetics. Genome Biol Evol. 8:161–175.
  • Uribe JE, Gutiérrez-Rodríguez J. 2016. The complete mitogenome of the trilobite beetle Platerodrilus sp. (Elateroidea: Lycidae). Mitochondr DNA. 1:658–659.
  • Vaidya G, Lohman DJ, Meier R. 2011. Sequence Matrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 27:171–180.
  • Yu P, Henry C. 2012. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 28:1420–1428.
  • Zhou X, Li YY, Liu SL, Yang Q, Su X, Zhou LL, Tang M, Fu RB, Li JG, Huang QF. 2013. Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-fidelity recovery of biodiversity for bulk arthropod samples without PCR amplification. GigaSci. 2:4.