911
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium moschatum (Buch.-Ham.) Sw. 1805 (Orchidaceae)

, , , &
Pages 2027-2030 | Received 02 Aug 2022, Accepted 10 Nov 2022, Published online: 09 Dec 2022

Abstract

The morphological characteristic of Dendrobium moschatum (Buch.-Ham.) Sw. 1805 is very distinctive among Dendrobium Sw. 1799, and it has high medicinal and ornamental values. Here, we reported the first complete chloroplast genome of D. moschatum. The complete genome of D. moschatum was 159,701 bp in length with 130 genes, including 38 tRNA, 8 rRNA, and 84 protein-coding genes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that D. moschatum was strongly allied with D. denneanum Kerr. 1933.

The genus Dendrobium Sw. 1799 (Orchidaceae) is one of the largest genera in angiosperms, over 1500 species that are mainly distributed in Asia and Oceania (Teixeira da Silva et al. Citation2016). Most members of this genus have high ornamental value and some Dendrobium species are widely used in Chinese traditional medicine. Dendrobium moschatum (Buch.-Ham.) Sw. 1805 has a very distinctive morphological characteristic among Dendrobium species featured with the length of erect stem to 1 m, inflorescences 20 cm, lip slipperlike (Zhu et al. Citation2009) (). However, due to its highly medicinal and ornamental values, the wild resources of D. moschatum have been anthropogenically over-exploited. The native population of the species has dramatically declined and D. moschatum has been ranked as critically endangered (CR) of the Red List of China Higher Plants based on IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Qin et al. Citation2017). Therefore, to better reserve this orchid and understand its genetic information, we assembled and characterized the complete chloroplast (cp) genome of D. moschatum.

The leave samples of D. moschatum were collected from Guizhou Dendrobium germplasm bank in Guiyang, Guizhou, China (106.73 E, 26.49 N). Voucher specimens were deposited in the Dendrological Herbarium in Guizhou Academy of Forestry (GZAF, He Li, [email protected], voucher number: 202110045) and were identified as D. moschatum by Professor Lian-Hui Wang. The plant sample is cultivated and collection was permitted by the Institute of Forestry Biotechnology, Guizhou Academy of Forestry. Total DNA was extracted from fresh leaves using modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle Citation1987) and sequenced on Illumina nova-seq 6000 platform. Genome sequences were identified and assembled with SPAdes v.3.5.0 (Lapidus et al. Citation2014). The genome was annotated by CpGAVAS2 (Shi et al. Citation2019) and GeSeq (Tillich et al. Citation2017). The circular genome map was drawn using CPGView program (http://www.1kmpg.cn/cpgview/) ().

Figure 1. Dendrobium moschatum. (A) Plant; (B) inflorescences; (C) lateral view of the opened flower; (D) frontal view of the opened flower.

Figure 1. Dendrobium moschatum. (A) Plant; (B) inflorescences; (C) lateral view of the opened flower; (D) frontal view of the opened flower.

The cp genome of D. moschatum (GenBank accession OM161978) is 15,9701 bp in length, which presented a typical quadripartite structure, containing a large single-copy (LSC: 87,441 bp) region, a small single-copy (SSC: 17,544 bp) region, and two inverted repeat regions (IRA and IRB: 27,358 bp) (). Furthermore, 130 genes were annotated in the cp genome of D. moschatum, including 84 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. The total GC content of the cp genome is 37.26% ().

Figure 2. Complete plastome gene map of the Dendrobium moschatum. The map contains six tracks. From the center outward, the first track shows the dispersed repeats. The dispersed repeats consist of direct (D) and Palindromic (P) repeats, connected with red and green arcs. The second track shows the long tandem repeats as short blue bars. The third track shows the short tandem repeats or microsatellite sequences as short bars with different colors. The small single-copy (SSC), inverted repeat (IRa and IRb), and large single-copy (LSC) regions are shown on the fourth track. The GC content along the genome is plotted on the fifth track. The base frequency at each site along the genome will be shown between the fourth and fifth tracks. The genes are shown on the sixth track.

Figure 2. Complete plastome gene map of the Dendrobium moschatum. The map contains six tracks. From the center outward, the first track shows the dispersed repeats. The dispersed repeats consist of direct (D) and Palindromic (P) repeats, connected with red and green arcs. The second track shows the long tandem repeats as short blue bars. The third track shows the short tandem repeats or microsatellite sequences as short bars with different colors. The small single-copy (SSC), inverted repeat (IRa and IRb), and large single-copy (LSC) regions are shown on the fourth track. The GC content along the genome is plotted on the fifth track. The base frequency at each site along the genome will be shown between the fourth and fifth tracks. The genes are shown on the sixth track.

To infer phylogenetic position of D. moschatum, other 30 Dendrobium plastid genomes were selected to carry out analyses with Paphiopedilum micranthum T. Tang et F. T. Wang 1951 and P. armeniacum S. C. Chen et F. Y. Liu 1982 (Orchidaceae) as outgroups. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT 7.409 (Katoh and Standley Citation2013), and maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis was performed using RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE v.8.2.12 (Stamatakis Citation2014) on the CIPRES Science Gateway (http://www.phylo.org/) (Miller et al. Citation2010) under the GTRGAMMA substitution model. The result showed that D. comatum is phylogenetically related to D. denneanum Kerr 1933 (). This newly reported cp genome of D. moschatum is of great benefit to further investigation on its phylogeny and conservation in Dendrobium.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from maximum-likelihood based on 32 complete chloroplast genomes with Paphiopedilum micranthum and P. armeniacum as outgroups. The position of Dendrobium moschatum is marked in bold. The following sequences were used: Dendrobium aduncum LC192953 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. aphyllum LC192953 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. catenatum KX507360 (Zhong et al. Citation2016), D. chrysanthum LC193514 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. chrysotoxum LC193517 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. crepidatum LC193509 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. denneanum LC192955 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. devonianum LC192956 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. ellipsophyllum LC193519 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. falconeri LC192957 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. fanjingshanense LC193523 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. fimbriatum LC193521 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. henryi LC193513 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. hercoglossum LC192959 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. huoshanense LC269310, D. jenkinsii LC193515 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. loddigesii LC317044 (Niu et al. Citation2017), D. longicornu MN227146 (Wu et al. Citation2019), D. moniliforme MN200384 (Kim et al. Citation2020), D. parishii LC193518 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. primulinum LC192810 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. salaccense LC193510 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. scoriarum LC348851 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. shixingense LC348860 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. spatella LC193511 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. strongylanthum KR673323 (Li et al. Citation2016), D. wardianum LC192961 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. wilsonii LC193508 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. xichouense LC193520 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), Paphiopedilum armeniacum KT388109 (Kim et al. Citation2015), and P. micranthum NC_045278.

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree inferred from maximum-likelihood based on 32 complete chloroplast genomes with Paphiopedilum micranthum and P. armeniacum as outgroups. The position of Dendrobium moschatum is marked in bold. The following sequences were used: Dendrobium aduncum LC192953 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. aphyllum LC192953 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. catenatum KX507360 (Zhong et al. Citation2016), D. chrysanthum LC193514 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. chrysotoxum LC193517 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. crepidatum LC193509 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. denneanum LC192955 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. devonianum LC192956 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. ellipsophyllum LC193519 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. falconeri LC192957 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. fanjingshanense LC193523 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. fimbriatum LC193521 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. henryi LC193513 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. hercoglossum LC192959 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. huoshanense LC269310, D. jenkinsii LC193515 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. loddigesii LC317044 (Niu et al. Citation2017), D. longicornu MN227146 (Wu et al. Citation2019), D. moniliforme MN200384 (Kim et al. Citation2020), D. parishii LC193518 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. primulinum LC192810 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. salaccense LC193510 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. scoriarum LC348851 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. shixingense LC348860 (Zhu et al. Citation2018), D. spatella LC193511 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. strongylanthum KR673323 (Li et al. Citation2016), D. wardianum LC192961 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. wilsonii LC193508 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), D. xichouense LC193520 (Zhitao et al. Citation2017), Paphiopedilum armeniacum KT388109 (Kim et al. Citation2015), and P. micranthum NC_045278.

Author contributions

Yan-Bing Yang, Feng-Xia Yan, and Fan Tian accomplished the design, writing, and revision of this study. Lian-Hui Wang and Feng-Jiao Zhou participated in the collection and identification of plant material. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethical approval

Research and collection of plant material was conducted according to the guidelines provided by Forestry Biotechnology, Guizhou Academy of Forestry. Permission was granted by Forestry Biotechnology, Guizhou Academy of Forestry to carry out research on the species.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov under the accession no. OM161978. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA838424, SRP375593, and SAMN28422334, respectively.

Additional information

Funding

This study work was funded by the Guizhou Forestry Bureau under Scientific Search Projects [[2019]01]; [[2019]02]; Qian Shi Ke He [2019008]; [[2021]02].

References

  • Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19:455–477.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15.
  • Katoh K, Standley D. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30(4):772–780.
  • Kim HT, Kim JS, Moore MJ, Neubig KM, Williams NH, Whitten WM, Kim JH. 2015. Seven new complete plastome sequences reveal rampant independent loss of the ndh gene family across orchids and associated instability of the inverted repeat/small single-copy region boundaries. PLOS One. 10(11):e0142215.
  • Kim YK, Jo S, Cheon SH, Joo MJ, Hong JR, Kwak M, Kim KJ. 2020. Plastome evolution and phylogeny of Orchidaceae, with 24 new sequences. Front Plant Sci. 11:22.
  • Li J, Chen C, Wang ZZ. 2016. The complete chloroplast genome of the Dendrobium strongylanthum (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 27(4):3048–3049.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); New Orleans, LA.
  • Niu Z, Xue Q, Wang H, Xie X, Zhu S, Liu W, Ding X. 2017. Mutational biases and GC-biased gene conversion affect GC content in the plastomes of Dendrobium genus. Int J Mol Sci. 18(11):2307.
  • Qin H, Yang Y, Dong S, He Q, Jia Y, Zhao L, Yu S, Liu H, Liu B, Yan Y, et al. 2017. Threatened species list of China’s higher plants. Biodivers Sci. 25(7):696–744.
  • Shi L, Chen H, Jiang M, Wang L, Wu X, Huang L, Liu C. 2019. CpGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(W1):W65–W73.
  • Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30(9):1312–1313.
  • Teixeira da Silva JA, Jin XH, Dobránszki J, Lu JJ, Wang HZ, Zotz G, Cardoso JC, Zeng SJ. 2016. Advances in Dendrobium molecular research: applications in genetic variation, identification and breeding. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 95:196–216.
  • Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. 2017. GeSeq – versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(W1):W6–W11.
  • Wu XY, Li TZ, Chen GZ, Xu Q, Pan YY, Chen LJ. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome of Dendrobium longicornu (Orchidaceae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3776–3777.
  • Zhitao N, Shuying Z, Jiajia P, Ludan L, Jing S, Xiaoyu D. 2017. Comparative analysis of Dendrobium plastomes and utility of plastomic mutational hotspots. Sci Rep. 7(1):2073.
  • Zhong Z, Zhang G, Lai X, Huang S. 2016. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of a new variety of Dendrobium officinale 'zhong ke IV hao'. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 1(1):669–670.
  • Zhu GH, Ji ZH, Wood JJ, Wood HP. 2009. Dendrobium. In: Wu CY, Raven PH, Hong DY, editors. Flora of China. Vol. 25. Beijing and St. Louis: Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press; p. 367–397.
  • Zhu S, Niu Z, Xue Q, Wang H, Xie X, Ding X. 2018. Accurate authentication of Dendrobium officinale and its closely related species by comparative analysis of complete plastomes. Acta Pharm Sin B. 8(6):969–980.