Abstract
This article introduces a new operator defined by the convolution of the Poisson distribution series and the generalized Mittag-Leffler function. Applying this operator, we study a novel subclass of analytic functions using the technique of fuzzy differential subordination. Also, we prove some significant results related to the fuzzy differential relation for this novel class. These results are applied to particular functions to showcase the significance of our findings.
1. Introduction
In 1965, Lofti A. Zadeh gave the concept of Fuzzy set theory in his article’ Fuzzy sets’ Zadeh (Citation1965). This paper is a master piece to the study of Fuzzy set theory and piqued the attention of researchers from various domains such as mathematics, sciences, social science and engineering. It began from the idea that components of human thinking are linguistic terms not the numbers. Over time, the study of Fuzzy theory has indeed expanded and found applications in various branches of science. Fuzzy theory deals with uncertainty and provides a framework for reasoning and decision-making where exact binary logic is insufficient. For example, Fuzzy set theory is applicable in Fuzzy geometric transformations, Image processing and Computer vision, Optimization and Decision-making, etc. The flexibility and ability to handle uncertainty makes Fuzzy theory a valuable tool in addressing real-world problems in various fields (see (Coffin & Taylor, Citation1996; Ganesh & Arivazhagan, Citation2017; Teodorescu, Citation2011; Tzes & Borowiec, Citation1996)).
The notion of differential subordination has been developed and studied within the field of Complex analysis. Diverse branches of the area, such as Geometric function theory and Fractional calculus have extensively used this concept to introduce and investigate various classes of analytic functions (seeJabeen & Saliu, 2023; Mihsin et al., Citation2022; Raza et al., Citation2021; Saliu et al., Citation2022)). Although the concept of differential subordination has started some decades ago but the work of Mocanu and Miller in 1981 and their monograph’ Differential Subordination; Theory and Application’ Miller, & Mocanu, (Citation2000). is the gateway to the in-depth study of theory of differential subordination. In 2011, (Oros, and Oros. (2012) , extended the idea of differential subordination and systematically developed the concept of Fuzzy differential subordination. This notion integrates ideas from Fuzzy set theory and Complex analysis by handling uncertainty in the context of analytical functions. As a result, the novel area has witness significant developments in Geometric function theory. For more information in this direction, one may see (El-Deeb & Lupas, Citation2020; Kanwal et al., Citation2023; Lupaş & Oros, Citation2021; Shah et al., Citation2023; Shah et al., Citation2023).
Inspired by its vast applications, we used the technique of Fuzzy differential subordination to introduce a subclass of analytic functions involving Poisson distribution and generalized Mittag-Leffler functions. Furthermore, we investigate some interesting results associated with the Fuzzy differential subordination for this novel class. The motivation behind the present article is the current developments and principally the recent works of Lupas & Oros, 2021; Lupaş & Oros, Citation2015 We start by defining some subclasses of analytic functions necessary to introduce our novel class.
Let be an open unit disc on a complex plane and the class of holomorphic functions in We denote to be the class of normalized analytic functions with For we have the series representation
Also, we let
Let S denote the class of normalized univalent functions and the class of all convex functions. Analytically, if and only if
Let and be in Then is subordinate to denoted by if there exists analytic function w with and such that for all
Fuzzy differential subordination extends the concept of differential subordination to fuzzy logic. The notion of fuzzy differential subordination involves knowing the properties of a differential expression on a fuzzy set for a function, allow one to determin the properties of that function on a given fuzzy set. We introduce the following notions of the Fuzzy set.
Definition 1.1
Gal, & Ban, (Citation1996). Let X be a non-empty set. A Fuzzy subset A of X is the pair such that FA: is defined to be the membership function of A as (1) (1) and is the support of the Fuzzy set consisting of all the elements with non-zero membership value of set A. So, we can also write as
It is worth mentioning that for a Fuzzy subset, 0 is the smallest and 1 is the highest membership value. We denote the membership of empty set as while the set X itself has the membership value as
Definition 1.2
(Lupaş, and Oros (Citation2021) . Let be a fixed point in Let be two analytic functions. The function g is said to be the fuzzy subordinate to the function h and written as for or we can also write if the following conditions are true:
The relationship between notions of classical subordination and fuzzy subordination was discussed by Oros et al. in (Oros & Oros, Citation2011). In this paper, they proved that every classical subordination is not equivalent to fuzzy subordination. However, if we assume is univalent, then if and only if It means that the classical subordination and fuzzy subordination coincide if and only if is univalent. For a clear understanding of this fact, (Oros, and Oros (Citation2011) present the following examples.
Example 1.3.
Let and be defined in Clearly, these functions are not univalent in but If then The condition implies On the other hand, using the definition of subordination, since is not univalent in
The subsequent example shows when the two subordinations coincide.
Example 1.4.
Let and It is clear that Furthermore, if we consider then which implies that Since is univalent, then
Conversely, suppose It is easy to see that maps the open unit disc onto the right half of Lemniscate of Bernoulli i.e. and maps the open unit disc onto the right half of the complex plane. Therefore, which means Also, and hence
Definition 1.5
(Oros, and Oros (Citation2012). Consider and let h be a univalent function in with, (2) (2)
For an analytic function ρ in with if the following fuzzy differential subordination of second order is satisfied (3) (3)
That is, (4) (4)
Then, ρ will be the fuzzy solution of fuzzy differential subordination. A univalent function will be the fuzzy dominant to the fuzzy differential solution if that is, (5) (5)
and it satisfies (Coffin & Taylor, Citation1996) for all function ρ. A fuzzy dominant that satisfies the following condition (6) (6) for all fuzzy dominants of (Coffin & Taylor, Citation1996) is called fuzzy best dominant.
Swedish Mathematician Gosta Mittag-Leffler introduced Mittag-Leffler function in 1903 while studying summations of some divergent series (Mittag-Leffler (Citation1903). The Mittag Leffler function has the form which was extended by Wiman (Citation1905). and defined as:
This function is normalized as: where and The concept of generalized Mittag-Lefller functions presented in Srivastava, and El-Deeb (Citation2021). plays a key role in the theory of Fractional calculus and has applications in modeling complex physical systems with memory effects. Due to the significance of Mittag-Leffler functions, many researchers used it in Geometric function theory (see Kanwal, Citation2022; Noreen et al., Citation2019; Srivastava et al., Citation2022). In a more general sense, Attiya (2021) used generalized Mittag-Leffler functions to introduce the following function: where and k is the complex number such that
Distribution series for random variables are studied in Geometric function theory over the span of last decade. Posisson Distribution series was developed by Poisson (Citation2013). The series provides a mathematical framework for understanding and analyzing random processes with a discrete event structure. For a random variable X, the probability mass function of Poisson distribution with parameter m > 0 is define as follows:
In 2014, Porwal (Citation2014) introduced a series having the coefficients as probability of Poisson Distribution. In the article, he applied this series on univalent functions. Moreover, Porwal and Dixit presented Mittag-Leffler type poisson distribution series in Porwal, and Dixit (Citation2017) . The probability mass function of this distribution with parameter m > 0 is The probability mass function for with parameter m > 0 can also be defined in a similar way as Moreover, Frasin et al. (Citation2022) defined power series whose coefficients involve probabilities of Poisson distribution series of Mittag-Leffler type. Frasin et al. (Citation2021) introduced the following series with generalized Mittag-Leffler function: (7) (7)
By using the technique of convolution, we define the following new operator.
Definition 1.6
(Frasin et al., Citation2021). Let Define
Using (Frasin et al., Citation2021) in the above expression, we get the following function (8) (8) where
For convenience, we will consider our parameters to be real-valued for We introduce the following class of analytic functions using the operator
Definition 1.7
(Frasin et al., Citation2021). Consider A function belongs to class if the following inequality holds true:
2. Preliminary results
In this section, we present some important results which are significant to our study.
Lemma 2.1
(Miller, and Mocanu (Citation2000) . Let and if then
Lemma 2.2
(Oros, and Oros (Citation2012)). Let h be a convex function and let with If ρ is analytic in and define by such that is analytic in and
Then where is convex in open unit disc and fuzzy best dominant.
Lemma 2.3.
[21] Let such that
Define a fucntion ρ as such that
Then
This result is sharp.
3. Main results
In this section, we prove our main results.
Theorem 3.1.
Let and suppose that If and (9) (9) then the following differential subordination (10) (10) implies (11) (11)
This result is sharp.
Proof.
Since then a simple computation gives Since is a linear operator, we can write the above equation in the following form (12) (12)
On differentiating (Kanwal, Citation2022) w.r.t Ϛ, we get (13) (13)
From fuzzy differential subordination (Jabeen & Saliu, Citation2023), we can write (Lupaş & Oros, Citation2021) as (14) (14)
Set (15) (15) such that Then substituting (Miller and Mocanu, Citation2000) into (Lupaş & Oros, Citation2015), we obtain
Applying Lemma (2.3), we have That is, which implies
Hence, we get the result. □
Theorem 3.2.
Assume that
Let Is denote the operator given in (Ganesh & Arivazhagan, Citation2017). Then where (16) (16)
Proof.
Following the initial procedures of the proof of Theorem 3.1, we obtain (17) (17) where
Using Lemma (2.2), we get which implies
Thus, (18) (18)
By Lemma (2.2), it can easily be seen that and is the best fuzzy dominant. Therefore, we have and
Hence, the proof is complete. □
Theorem 3.3.
Let function with and
Let f satisfy the following fuzzy differential subordination (19) (19)
Then (20) (20)
The result is sharp.
Proof.
Let
Then
Therefore, from (Oros & Oros, Citation2011), we arrive at which implies that
Using Lemma (2.3), we obtain which means
We demonstrate Theorem 3.3 with following example. □
Example 3.4.
Let with and Then (21) (21)
Take For the operator on gives
Also, and
By Theorem 3.3, we have which means
Theorem 3.5.
Consider such that with
If satisfies the following fuzzy differential subordination (22) (22) then (23) (23) where is convex and best fuzzy dominant.
Proof.
Let (24) (24)
where From Lemma (2.1), we know that belongs to and satisfies fuzzy differential subordination (Oros & Oros, Citation2011). Since l is fuzzy best dominant. Now, we observe that So (Poisson, Citation2013), becomes By using Lemma 3, we obtain Thus, (25) (25) which completes the proof. □
Corollary 3.6. Let and satisfies the following relation Then the function ) given by is convex and fuzzy best dominant.
Example 3.7.
Let with such that we get
Therefore, from Lemma (2.1), it implies that the function f is convex. Let us consider For the operator
Also, and Since then by Theorem 3.5,
Thus, we get which implies that is a fuzzy best dominant.
4. Conclusion
In the present article, we used the operator associated with generalized Mittag-Leffler function and Poisson distribution to introduce a novel subclass of analytic functions defined by a means of fuzzy differential subordination. Some significant results related to second order fuzzy differential subordination are obtained. Moreover, some examples are given as an application of our results.
The work presented in this article can be generalized in a variety of ways. Geometric properties, like coefficient estimates, inclusion relations, and distortion results for this class can be established. Furthermore, the idea presented in this article can also be expanded in the realm of fractional calculus. Results related to higher order fuzzy differential subordination can also be established.
4.1. Subject classification codes
[2010]Primary 30C45, 30C50
Notes on contributor(s)
The authors worked jointly and equally on this manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgement(s)
The authors are thankful to the Vice Chancellors of Fatima Jinnah Women University and University of the Gambia for providing excellent research and academic environment.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Ahmad, M., Frasin, B., Murugusundaramoorthy, G., & Al-Khazaleh, A. (2021). An application of Mittag–Leffler-type Poisson distribution on certain subclasses of analytic functions associated with conic domains. Heliyon, 7(10), e08109. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08109
- Alessa, N., Venkateswarlu, B., Reddy, P. T., Loganathan, K., & Tamilvanan, K. (2021). A new subclass of analytic functions related to Mittag-Leffler type Poisson distribution series. Journal of Function Spaces, 2021, 1–7. doi:10.1155/2021/6618163
- Attiya, A. A., Aouf, M. K., Ali, E. E., & Yassen, M. F. (2021). Differential subordination and superordination results associated with Mittag–Leffler function. Mathematics, 9(3), 226. doi:10.3390/math9030226
- Coffin, M. A., & Taylor, B. W. III, (1996). Multiple criteria R&D project selection and scheduling using fuzzy logic. Computers & Operations Research, 23(3), 207–220. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(96)81768-0
- El-Deeb, S. M., & Lupas, A. A. (2020). A. Fuzzy differential subordinations associated with an integral operator. Analele Universităţii din Oradea. Fascicula Matematică, 27, 133–140.
- Frasin, B. A., Murugusundaramoorthy, G., & Aouf, M. K. (2022). Subclasses of analytic functions associated with Mittag-Leffler-type Poisson distribution. Palestine Journal of Mathematics, 11(1), 496–503.
- Frasin, B. A., Porwal, S., & Yousef, F. (2021). Subclasses of starlike and convex functions associated with Mittag-Leffler-type Poisson distribution series. Montes Taurus Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(3), 147–154.
- Gal, S. G., & Ban, A. I. (1996). Elemente de Matematica Fuzzy.University of Oradea
- Ganesh, K. K., & Arivazhagan, D. (2017). New cryptography algorithm with fuzzy logic for effective data communication. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(48), 1–6. doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i48/108970
- Jabeen, K., & Saliu, A. (2023). A study of q-analogue of the analytic charachterization of Limaçon functions. Miskolc Mathematical Notes, 24(1), 179–195. doi:10.18514/MMN.2023.3850
- Kanwal, B., Hussain, S., & Abdeljawad, T, (2022). On certain inclusion relations of functions with bounded rotations associated with Mittag-Leffler functions. AIMS Mathematics, 7(5), 7866–7887. doi:10.3934/math.2022440
- Kanwal, B., Hussain, S., & Saliu, A. (2023). Fuzzy differential subordination related with strongly Janowski type functions. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Engineering, 31(1), 1–15.
- Lupaş, A. A., & Oros, G. (2015). On special fuzzy differential subordinations using Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operators. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 261, 119–127. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2015.03.087
- Lupaş, A. A., & Oros, G. I. (2021). New applications of Sălăgean and Ruscheweyh operators for obtaining fuzzy differential subordinations. Mathematics, 9(16), 2000. doi:10.3390/math9162000
- Mihsin, B. K., Atshan, W. G., Alhily, S. S., & Lupaş, A. A. (2022). New results on fourth-order differential subordination and superordination for univalent analytic functions involving a linear operator. Symmetry, 14(2), 324. doi:10.3390/sym14020324
- Miller, S. S., & Mocanu, P. T. (2000). Differential subordinations: Theory and applications, vol 225. Series on monographs and textbooks in pure and applied mathematics. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker Incorporated.
- Mittag-Leffler, G. (1903). Sur la nouvelle function, CR Acad. Sic. Paris.(Ser. II), 137, 554–558.
- Noreen, S., Raza, M., & Malik, S. N. (2019). Certain geometric properties of Mittag-Leffler functions. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2019(1), 1–15. doi:10.1186/s13660-019-2044-4
- Oros, G. I., & Oros, G. (2011). The notion of subordination in fuzzy sets theory. General Mathematics, 19(4), 97–103.
- Oros, G. I., & Oros, G. (2012). Dominants and best dominants in fuzzy differential subordinations. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Mathematica, 57(2), 239–248.
- Poisson, S. D. (2013). Researches into the Probabilities of Judgements in Criminal and Civil Cases. Paris (O. Sheynin, Trans.). Berlin: NG-Verlag.
- Porwal, S. (2014). An application of a Poisson distribution series on certain analytic functions. Journal of Complex Analysis, 2014, 1–3. doi:10.1155/2014/984135
- Porwal, S., & Dixit, K. K. (2017). On Mittag-Leffler type Poisson distribution. Afrika Matematika, 28(1-2), 29–34. doi:10.1007/s13370-016-0427-y
- Raza, M., Naz, H., Malik, S. N., & Islam, S. (2021). On q-analogue of differential subordination associated with lemniscate of Bernoulli. Journal of Mathematics. 2021, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2021/5353372
- Raza, M., Sokół, J., & Mushtaq, S. (2019). Differential subordinations for analytic functions. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science, 43(3), 883–890. doi:10.1007/s40995-017-0430-7
- Saliu, A., Jabeen, K., & Ravichandran, V. (2023). Differential subordination for certain strongly starlike functions. Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo Series 2, 73(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s12215-023-00904-5
- Saliu, A., Jabeen, K., Al-Shbeil, I., Oladejo, S. O., & Cătaş, A. (2022). Radius and differential subordination results for starlikeness associated with limaçon class. Journal of Function Spaces, 2022, 1–15. doi:10.1155/2022/8264693
- Shah, S. A., Ali, E. E., Cătaș, A., & Albalahi, A. M. (2023). On fuzzy differential subordination associated with q-difference operator. AIMS Mathematics, 8(3), 6642–6650. doi:10.3934/math.2023336
- Shah, S. A., Ekram, E. A., Asghar, A. M., Thabet, A., & Abeer, M. A. (2023). Inclusion results for the class of fuzzy α-convex functions. AIMS Mathematics, 8(1), 1375–1383. doi:10.3934/math.2023069
- Srivastava, H. M., & El-Deeb, S. M. (2021). Fuzzy differential subordinations based upon the Mittag-Leffler type Borel distribution. Symmetry, 13(6), 1023. doi:10.3390/sym13061023
- Srivastava, H. M., & Tomovski, Ž. (2009). Fractional calculus with an integral operator containing a generalized Mittag–Leffler function in the kernel. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing. 211(1), 198–210. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.055
- Srivastava, H. M., Kumar, A., Das, S., & Mehrez, K. (2022). Geometric properties of a certain class of Mittag–Leffler-type functions. Fractal and Fractional, 6(2), 54. doi:10.3390/fractalfract6020054
- Teodorescu, H. N. (2011). On fuzzy sequences, fixed points and periodicity in iterated fuzzy maps. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 6(4), 749–760. doi:10.15837/ijccc.2011.4.2107
- Tzes, A., & Borowiec, J. (1996). Applications of fuzzy logic and neural networks to identification and control problems in fluid mechanics. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Fluids Engineering Division Newsletter, 242, 29–34. doi:10.1115/IMECE1996-0950
- Wiman, A. (1905). Uber de fundamental satz in der theorie der funktionen Eα(x). Acta Mathematica, 29(0), 191–201. doi:10.1007/BF02403202
- Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X