3
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Comparative efficiency ratings between public and private acute inpatient facilities

Pages 651-657 | Received 01 Sep 1999, Accepted 15 Dec 1999, Published online: 07 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study are to compare clinical outcomes and efficiency ratings in an acute psychiatric inpatient facility with findings from other studies, and to examine relationships between symptom severity, admission medico-legal status and length of stay.

Method: The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales was administered at admission and discharge and analysed against admission medico-legal status and length of stay. Efficiency ratings were calculated and compared with those from other acute psychiatric inpatient settings.

Results: Clinical outcomes and efficiency ratings were similar to those from other public acute inpatient facilities, with greater admission severities and higher efficiency ratings than those found in private facilities. Involuntary hospitalisation was found to be associated with higher admission severities and longer lengths of stay.

Conclusions: Outcome or effect size is enhanced by higher admission severities, however, mean outcome per 10 days of stay is decreased by involuntary admission legal status. Factors unrelated to admission legal status effect differences in efficiency ratings found between public and private acute psychiatric inpatient facilities.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.