22
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psychiatric Services

Do clinical pathways really improve clinical performance in mental health settings?

, , , , &
Pages 395-398 | Published online: 16 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Objective: Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH) Mental Health developed and trialled two clinical pathways on psychosis and depression between 2001 and 2003 with the aim of improving a range of clinical and financial parameters. There was a strong commitment from senior management, appropriate resources were allocated and there was adequate staff support. Following a 6-month trial, the pathways were reworked extensively and combined into an acute inpatient pathway. From October 2003 to 2004, we trialled the acute inpatient clinical pathway, and monitored clinical and financial parameters.

Conclusion: Over this 12-month period, the acute inpatient clinical pathway failed to demonstrate improvement on a range of clinical and financial parameters and its use was ceased. This trial lends support to the view that the complexity, individuality and variability of mental disorders means that clinical pathways are not beneficial in mental health settings.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.