124
Views
38
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Children's Use of Emergency Departments for Asthma: Persistent Barriers or Acute Need?

, M.D., M.P.H., , Ph.D., , Ph.D., , M.D., M.P.H., , Ph.D. & , M.D., Sc.D.
Pages 289-299 | Published online: 28 Apr 2003
 

Abstract

Our objective was to explore, in a predominantly Latino inner-city population, why caregivers bring their children with asthma to the ED (emergency department). We conducted bilingual parent surveys and medical chart abstractions of a consecutive ED sample consisting of 234 children with asthma (69% Latino; 54% Spanish-speaking) and their caregivers. Outcome measures included: Citation the acute need for ED services based on objective physiological measures, Citation the extent to which these children experienced barriers to quality primary care for asthma before the ED visit, and Citation the relative importance caregivers assigned to worsening symptoms versus perceived barriers to non-ED care when deciding to bring their child to the ED. Most children had moderate or severe asthma attacks. In the prior month, only 33% went to a primary care provider, 83% had used a bronchodilator, and 63%, an age-appropriate spacer device. Seventy-five percent of caregivers cited perceived acute need, instead of barriers to primary care, as the most important reason for using the ED. This perception of acute need was associated with moderate or severe asthma attacks according to objective physiological measures, after controlling for health and sociodemographic characteristics. Children with asthma who use the ED encounter barriers to primary care, but caregivers' perception of acute need—validated by independent measures of attack severity—dominates caregivers' decision to use the ED. Ensuring continuity of care for children with asthma would involve not only improving various aspects of access to and quality of primary non-ED care—including parent education about early recognition and treatment of asthma attacks—but also providing families with practical low-cost alternatives for 24-hour care and assuring linkages between the ED and sources of primary care.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,078.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.