Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 13, 2012 - Issue 4
155
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original research papers

Development of the A§E test battery for assessment of pitch perception in speech

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 206-219 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013
 

Abstract

Objectives

The auditory speech sounds evaluation 2009 test battery for assessment of speech pitch perception is presented. It was designed to (a) assess perception of pitch in linguistic contexts without the confounds of secondary acoustic cues, (b) be usable with listeners from different language backgrounds, and (c) be suitable for use in a clinical setting. The need for this test battery arises from increased awareness of the importance of prosody in clinical practice, and the development of methods for improving pitch perception in listeners with profound hearing losses.

Methods

Identification and discrimination tasks based on linguistic contexts were developed to establish listeners' just noticeable differences (JNDs) for pitch changes. Stimuli were pseudosentences and pseudowords based on speech from a female speaker, overlain with stylized pitch contours. Target pitch excursions were varied from the 200 Hz baseline to a maximum of 349 Hz. Ninety normal-hearing listeners participated in test validation that assessed goals (a)–(c), established test–retest reliability, and gathered normative data.

Results

The JNDs on non-linguistic, control tasks were lower than on linguistic ones, showing that non-linguistic tasks may overestimate pitch perception in speech. Listeners from different language backgrounds scored comparably on most linguistic tasks, and test–retest differences were non-significant. Test usability as evidenced by task duration and subject experience seemed satisfactory for clinical use.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by EU-FP7-SME-222291 Dual Pro Dual electric-acoustic speech processor with linguistic assessment tools for deaf individuals with residual low-frequency hearing. We would like to thank Agnes Légèr and Christian Lorenzi for the independent check of the stimulus materials' acoustic contents, Anne van der Kant for help in testing listeners, Vincent van Heuven and Johan Rooryck for valuable discussion, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. Vincent Péan of Neurelec France provided the scripts for generating low-pass filtered stimuli.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 380.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.