471
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cost effectiveness of letrozole versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ early-stage breast cancer

, &
Pages 2315-2328 | Accepted 21 Jul 2010, Published online: 23 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

Background:

The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 and Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trials demonstrated that, in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer, 5 years of initial adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole or anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen. With expected generic availability of anastrozole in July 2010 and letrozole in June 2011, there may be financial pressures prior to letrozole's generic availability to start treatment-naïve patients on anastrozole vs. letrozole or to switch patients already receiving letrozole to anastrozole.

Methods:

A Markov model was used to estimate cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with letrozole vs. anastrozole from the US healthcare system perspective. Cost effectiveness was examined separately in treatment-naïve patients and in patients already receiving letrozole. For the latter, cost effectiveness of continued letrozole vs. therapeutic substitution (TS) to generic anastrozole was evaluated separately in cohorts defined on years of endocrine therapy remaining. TS to generic anastrozole was assumed to result in an additional 5% of patients discontinuing endocrine therapy. Probabilities of distant recurrence and death were taken from reports of BIG 1-98, ATAC, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group meta-analysis of tamoxifen, and other published sources. Carry-over effects of aromatase inhibitors were assumed to be proportional to treatment duration. Costs of aromatase inhibitors were assumed to decline by 75% with generic availability.

Results:

In treatment-naïve patients, total expected lifetime costs are $3916 greater with letrozole vs. anastrozole. However, initiation of treatment with letrozole results in a gain of 0.15 QALYs. Cost per QALY gained with letrozole vs. anastrozole is $25 846. In patients already receiving letrozole, the increase in total expected lifetime costs with continued letrozole vs. TS to anastrozole is between $4200 and $4500 in all cohorts. QALYs gained with letrozole range from 0.21 in those with 4 years of endocrine therapy remaining to 0.13 in those with 1 year of therapy remaining. Cost per QALY gained ranges from $20 276 to $34 356.

Conclusion:

For postmenopausal women with HR+ early-stage breast cancer, letrozole is more likely to be cost effective vs. anastrozole in treatment-naïve patients and in patients already receiving letrozole. Limitations of the study include a lack of direct evidence comparing letrozole and anastrozole and lack of data on rates of discontinuation due to therapeutic substitution with aromatase inhibitors.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

Funding for this research was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

A.G. has disclosed that she is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. M.L. and T.E.D. have disclosed that they are employees of PAI (Policy Analysis Inc.), which has received research support and consulting fees from Novartis. T.E.D. has disclosed that he has received honoraria from Novartis.

Some peer reviewers receive honoraria from CMRO for their review work. The peer reviewers of this paper have disclosed that they have no relevant financial relationships.

Acknowledgments

The authors have disclosed that they had no outside editorial assistance in preparing this manuscript.

An abstract that describes preliminary results of the study is published online at www.asco.org and www.jco.org (Delea TE, Lipsitz M, Zelt S, Guo A. Cost effectiveness of letrozole (LET) vs. anastrozole (ANA) in postmenopausal women (PMW) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer (EBC) based on indirect comparison of BIG 1-98 and ATAC. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(Suppl; abstr e11013)).

Notes

*Femara is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

†Arimidex is a registered trademark of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.