1,459
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Reports

A medication adherence and persistence comparison of hypertensive patients treated with single-, double- and triple-pill combination therapy

, , &
Pages 2415-2422 | Accepted 08 Sep 2014, Published online: 29 Sep 2014
 

Abstract

Objective:

Fixed-dose combination therapy reduces pill burden and may, therefore, improve medication adherence and health outcomes. This study compared adherence to and persistence with single-, double-, and triple-pill treatment regimens among hypertensive patients in a US clinical practice setting.

Methods:

Adults with hypertension treated with three anti-hypertensive medications were identified. Index date was the first occurrence of a single-, double-, or triple-pill regimen with olmesartan or valsartan plus amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide from July 2010 to September 2011. Patients were followed for 12 months to assess adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%) and time to discontinuation (medication gap ≥60 days) of the index regimen. Multivariate regression models were used to compare adjusted outcomes.

Results:

The number of prescribed pills in the index regimen was monotonically related to adherence with 55.3%, 40.4% and 32.6% of patients having PDC ≥80% in the single-, double- and triple-pill cohorts, respectively. In adjusted analysis, patients in the double- (odds ratio [OR]: 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42–0.48) and triple-pill (OR: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.22–0.30) cohorts were less likely to be adherent to their index regimens than those in the single-pill cohort. Double-pill (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.74–2.06) and triple-pill patients (HR: 2.49; 95% CI: 2.14–2.88) were more likely to discontinue treatment than single-pill patients.

Conclusions:

Greater pill burden was directly and significantly associated with decreased adherence and persistence with antihypertensive therapies in real-practice settings. Use of fixed-dose combinations that reduce pill burden could help patients to continue treatment and may result in improved clinical outcomes. Typical of observational studies, the potential for residual confounding of adherence estimates remains due to lack of randomization of treatment groups.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This study was funded by Daiichi Sankyo Inc.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

L.X. and O.B. have disclosed that they are employees of STATinMED Research, a paid consultant to Daiichi Sankyo Inc. F.F.-T. has disclosed that she is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Inc. and has financial interest in Daiichi Sankyo Inc. and other pharmaceutical companies. E.M. has disclosed that she is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Inc.

CMRO peer reviewer 1 has disclosed that he is on the speakers’ bureau of Novartis, Berlin Chemie, and UCB. CMRO peer reviewer 2 has no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

Statistical analysis support was provided by M. Furaha Kariburyo MPH of STATinMED Research. Statistical programming was conducted by Yuexi Wang MS of STATinMED Research. Editorial support was provided by Elizabeth Moran of STATinMED Research.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 681.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.