Radiation countermeasure agents: an update (2011 – 2014)

Abstract

Introduction: Despite significant scientific advances over the past 60 years towards the development of a safe, nontoxic and effective radiation countermeasure for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS), no drug has been approved by the US FDA. A radiation countermeasure to protect the population at large from the effects of lethal radiation exposure remains a significant unmet medical need of the US citizenry and, thus, has been recognized as a high priority area by the government.

Area covered: This article reviews relevant publications and patents for recent developments and progress for potential ARS treatments in the area of radiation countermeasures. Emphasis is placed on the advanced development of existing agents since 2011 and new agents identified as radiation countermeasure for ARS during this period.

Expert opinion: A number of promising radiation countermeasures are currently under development, seven of which have received US FDA investigational new drug status for clinical investigation. Four of these agents, CBLB502, Ex-RAD, HemaMax and OrbeShield, are progressing with large animal studies and clinical trials. G-CSF has high potential and well-documented therapeutic effects in countering myelosuppression and may receive full licensing approval by the US FDA in the future.

Keywords::

• countermeasures
• gastrointestinal syndrome
• hematopoietic syndrome
• mice
• nonhuman primates
• radiation

1. Introduction

Exposures to ionizing radiation, whether they are intended or unintended, are currently an undeniable reality and carry potentially catastrophic health consequences [1]. Therefore, medical preparedness and countermeasures are critical security issues, not only for the individual but also for the nation as well [2]. Current nuclear and radiological threats can be categorized into five groups: i) detonation of a sophisticated nuclear weapon (nuclear bomb); ii) detonation of an improvised nuclear device; iii) use of a radiological dispersal device or dirty bomb; iv) use of a simple radiological device; and v) an attack on a nuclear power plant [3]. The number of individuals who will need care after a large-scale event, such as an improvised nuclear device, will be very high. Models suggest that if a device similar to the bomb detonated over Hiroshima struck a city such as Washington DC, up to 175,000 individuals would require intensive medical care and ∼ 300,000 will require clinical management of radiation-induced myelosuppression [4].

Human acute radiation syndrome (ARS) follows intense, acute radiation doses > 1 Gy of whole-body irradiation or significant partial-body irradiation. The major clinical components of ARS include the hematopoietic (2 – 6 Gy), gastrointestinal (GI; 6 – 8 Gy) and cerebrovascular (> 8 Gy) sub-syndromes [5]. The hematopoietic sub-syndrome is characterized by significant, life-threatening blood cytopenias; the GI syndrome is characterized by massive loss of functional intestinal epithelia, resulting in potential fatal pathological sequelae of fluid and electrolyte imbalances, intestinal bleeding and sepsis. The relevant impact of radiation-induced mortality is dependent on dose, exposure rate and the quality of ionizing radiation involved. These sub-syndromes overlap and are oversimplified, especially at extremely high, intense radiation exposures, when pathologies cut across various organ systems of the body causing net clinical problems that surpass problems associated with any single organ system [6-8]. Individuals who fall into either hematopoietic or GI sub-syndromes, or both, can be effectively managed clinically by appropriate medical interventions (i.e., applications of medical countermeasures) and are more likely to be amenable to countermeasures, unlike those exposed to supra-lethal ionizing radiation (> 8 Gy or higher), which causes clinically unmanageable cerebrovascular syndrome. As a result, the former two sub-syndromes are considered appropriate and relevant clinical targets for the development of novel countering agents.

Radiation countermeasures fall into three broad classes: protectors, mitigators and therapeutics. Radioprotectors are administered before exposure to prevent damage [9]. Radiation mitigators are administered shortly after radiation exposure, before exposure symptoms manifest, to accelerate recovery or repair. Radiation therapeutics or treatments are given after symptoms manifest to stimulate repair or regeneration. Numerous candidate radiation countermeasures (specifically radioprotectants and radiomitigators) have been identified (Figure 1, Tables 1,2,3 and 4) and are currently being developed largely for US FDA approval and licensing [10-14]. Some agents have recently been applied for and received patents (Table 5). Radioprotectants will be useful for military personnel and first responders, as well as civilians expected to be exposed to fallout fields during evacuation procedures or rescue missions. Although the search for suitable radiation countermeasures was initiated more than half a century ago, no safe and effective radiation countermeasure for ARS has been approved by the US FDA.

Figure 1. Radiation countermeasures under development. Currently, there are seven radiation countermeasures that have US FDA IND status: Androstenediol (5-AED), BIO 300, CBLB502, Ex-RAD, HemaMax, Neupogen and OrbeShield. Neupogen and Leukine are expected to obtain US FDA Emergency Use Authorization and both are available in the SNS. Promising molecules at different stages of development are presented under different groups.

Table 1. Promising radiation countermeasures in advanced stages of development with US FDA IND status*.

Countermeasures	Mode of action	Efficacy in animal model of radiation injury	Safety/side effects in clinical trials	Remarks	Ref.
5-Androstenediol (5-AED)/Neumune	Immunomodulator – stimulates innate/adaptive immunity, G-CSF, anti-apoptotic, promotes hematopoietic recovery	Radioprotector and mitigator, effective in mice and NHPs, not effective against high doses of radiation that induce GI syndrome	Safe systemically; local skin toxicity at injection site	Not much development in the last 4 years	[15-24]
BDP/OrbeShield/beclomethasone 17,21-dipropionate	Anti-inflammatory and vasoconstrictor	Mitigates GI injury and protects canines against high dose of radiation (12 Gy)	Used for the treatment of rhinitis, sinusitis, aphthous ulcers	Clears very rapidly from the systemic circulation	[25,26]
BIO 300/Genistein	Antioxidant, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, cell cycle modulator	Effective when administered as protector (sc) or before and after irradiation (p.o.), hematopoietic recovery, reduced lung injury	Safe	Poor bioavailability, unfeasible dose size required for protection or mitigation against ARS	[27,33,35]
CBLB502/Entolimod/truncated flagellin	NF-κB activator, stimulates G-CSF, immunomodulator, free radical scavenger	Radioprotective and radiomitigative efficacies in mice and NHPs	Safe	EUA application may be submitted soon	[41,44,45]
HemaMax/NMIL12-1/recombinant human IL-12/rhuIL-12	Hematopoietic cytokine	Protects mice and NHPs, promotes hematopoietic recovery and GI functions	Safe and well tolerated in clinical trials	Appears promising based on NHP studies and clinical trials	[46-51,53]
ON01210/Ex-RAD/Recilisib/chlorobenzyl sulfone derivative	Upregulates PI3 kinase/AKT pathways, modulates apoptosis	Effective when administered either sc or p.o., optimal times of administration: 24 h and 15 min before irradiation	Non-toxic in Phase-I clinical trial	Currently under investigation for efficacy in NHPs	[55-60]

*Although G-CSF has US FDA IND status, it has been included in Table 2, as it has been procured for the SNS and may receive US FDA EUA status.

ARS: Acute radiation syndrome; BARDA: Biomedical Advanced Research Development Authority; GI: Gastrointestinal; IND: Investigational new drug; NHP: Nonhuman primate; p.o.: Orally; sc: Subcutaneously; SNS: Strategic national stockpile.

Table 2. Radiation countermeasures already in SNS that may receive US FDA EUA status.

Countermeasures	Mode of action	Efficacy in animal model of radiation injury	Safety/side effects	Remarks	Ref.
G-CSF/Neupogen/filgrastim	Stimulates: i) proliferation, differentiation, and function of neutrophil precursors; and ii) maturation and function of neutrophils	Effective in irradiated mice, canines, minipigs and NHPs	Used clinically for other indications and as off-label drug for radiation accident victims	Procured for SNS under PAHPRA	[53,64-73]
GM-CSF/Leukine/sargramostim	Promotes: i) survival, clonal expansion and differentiation of granulocytes and monocytes: and ii) maturation and activation of granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages	Effective in irradiated mice, canines and NHPs	Used clinically for other indications and as off-label drug for radiation accident victims	Procured for SNS under PAHPRA	[68,69,78-86]

EUA: Emergency use authorization; NHP: Nonhuman primate; PAHPRA: Pandemic and all-hazards preparedness reauthorization act; SNS: Strategic national stockpile.

Table 3. Other promising radiation countermeasures at advanced stages of development requiring US FDA IND status.

Countermeasures	Mode of action	Efficacy in animal model of radiation injury	Safety/side effects	Remarks	Ref.
Amifostine/Ethyol, 2-(3-aminopropyl) aminoethylphosphorothioate	Protects against radiation and chemotherapy induced DNA damage, anti-mutagenic and anti-carcinogenic, scavenges free radicals	Highly efficacious cytoprotectant in vivo at high doses	Sides effects at higher doses	FDA approved for the reduction of xerostomia in radiotherapy patients with head and neck cancers	[87-91]
γ-tocotrienol (GT3)	Antioxidant, free-radical scavenger, stimulates G-CSF, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor	Protect mice against hematopoietic and GI injury when administered prior to irradiation, efficacious in NHP (unpublished observation)	Safe (200 –1000 mg/kg)	Additional NHP efficacy studies being initiated at AFRRI	[93,96-98,102]
Myeloid progenitor cells	Bridging therapy, stimulates myeloid, erythroid and dendritic cell development	Effective against supralethal doses of radiation in murine model when administered as late as 7 d post-irradiation	Cells of human origin appear to be safe	CLT-008, human myeloid progenitors in Phase-I trial in patients undergoing umbilical cord blood transplant for hematological malignancies	[115-117]

GI: Gastrointestinal; GRAS: Generally regarded as safe by the US FDA; HMG-CoA: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A; IND: Investigational new drug.

Table 4. Promising radiation countermeasures in the early stages of development.

Countermeasures	Mode of action	Efficacy in animal model of ARS	Remarks	Ref.
ALXN4100TPO	Activates thrombopoietin receptor, stimulates platelet production	DRF = 1.32, 24 h prior to irradiation; DRF = 1.1, 12 h post-irradiation in CD2F1 mice	Not effective against mixed field; exposure	[74,119,119]
Palifermin	Stimulates epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation and upregulation of cytoprotective mechanisms	Significantly promoted the recovery of mucosa from radiation-induced injury demonstrated by mucosal histology, villus height, crypt depth and crypt cell proliferation	Reduce incidence, duration and severity of oral mucositis in patients receiving chemoradiotherapy	[120,121]
Superoxide dismutase (SOD)	Eliminates reactive oxygen intermediates, prevents radiation-induced apoptosis via mitochondrial membrane stabilization	MnSOD over-expression by transgene conferred protection against irradiation induced lung injury	Novel radioprotective antioxidant gene therapy to prevent and reduce radiation injury	[123-126]
Captopril	ACE protease inhibitor, increases prostaglandin E2	Accelerates recovery of erythrocytes, reticulocytes, leukocytes and platelets in mice	Mechanism of action has not been well established	[129,140]
3,3’-Diindolylmethane	Induces ATM-dependent, DDR-like response, enhances radiation-induced ATM signaling and NF-κB activation	Multi-dose schedule protected rodents against lethal doses of TBI up to 13 Gy, when initiated before or after irradiation, DRF = 1.6	Promising radioprotector and radiomitigator against high dose of radiation	[146]
Oltipraz	Induces electrophile detoxication enzymes, enhances expression of microsomal epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase genes	When administered orally 30 min prior to 8 Gy TBI, increased mouse survival	Oral efficacy needs to be investigated	[147,148]
Phosphoinisitide-3 kinase inhibitor (LY294002)	Regulates cellular signaling networks linked to survival, growth, proliferation, metabolism and differentiation of cells	Single administration after a lethal dose of γ-irradiation enhanced mouse survival, decreased DNA damage	Pharmacological approaches aimed at radiomitigation should be pursued	[149]
Fibroblast growth factor peptide	Enhances barrier functions and tight-junction protein production, improves cell proliferation, enhances DNA homologous repair and accelerates radiation-induced wound healing	Single dose of FGF-P (≤ 2 mg/kg) 24 h after TBI increased C57Bl/6 mouse survival	Also holds promise for thermal burns, ischemic wound healing, tissue engineering and stem-cell regeneration	[152,153]
Rspo1	Induces Wnt-β-catenin pathway and promotes intestinal stem cell regeneration	Improved survival of mice exposed to TBI and protects against GI syndrome	Rspo1 acts as a mitogenic factor for intestinal stem cells	[154]
GRI977143	Activates LPA2 receptors, ERK1/2 pro-survival pathway reducing BAX translocation, attenuates the activation of initiator and effector caspases, reduces DNA fragmentation and inhibits PARP-1 cleavage	Effective in rescuing mice from lethal irradiation when administered 24 h after exposure	Effectively reduces BAX translocation to the mitochondrion	[155]
Somatostatin analog (SOM230)	Preserves intestinal barrier function by decreased secretion of pancreatic enzymes	Effective radioprotector and radiomitigator	Effective with administration times in excess of 48 h post-irradiation	[156,157]
Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)	Restores salivary gland function through normalization of cell proliferation and improved amylase expression	Accelerates hematopoietic recovery	Clinically safe	[159]
Anticeramide antibody	Protects endothelial apoptosis in the small intestinal lamina propria and facilitates recovery of crypt stem cells	Prevents death of mice from GI syndrome after high radiation doses	Promising agent for GI syndrome	[160]
Phenylbutyrate	Inhibits histone deacetylase, cell proliferation, cell cycle arrest, DNA methylation, activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, increases gap junction communication	DRF of 1.31 in DBA/2 mouse model in protector schedule, also functions as a mitigator	Attenuates DNA damage and inhibit radiation-induced apoptosis	[161]
17-DMAG	Inhibits nitric oxide synthase, caspase-3 cascade and p53	A single oral dose before irradiation increased survival of CD2F1 mice	Not effective as a radiomitigator	[162]

17-DMAG: 17-Dimethylamino-ethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin; ARS: Acute radiation syndrome; DDR: DNA damage response; DRF: Dose reduction factor; GI: Gastrointestinal; Rspo1: R-spondin1; TBI: Total-body irradiation.

Table 5. Patents for radiation countermeasures (protectors, mitigators and therapeutics/treatments).

Patent/application number*	Year of publication	Inventor(s)	Molecule/compound details	Properties/purpose of the patent
US20110178016 A1	2011	Bartholomew et al.	Pulse parathyroid hormone	Stimulates hematopoiesis post-radiation
US20110020432 A1	2011	Cunningham	RL1P76 protein or an active fragment	Mitigation when administered >24h post-radiation, low toxicity
US20110225661 A1	2011	Deng et al.	Extracellular superoxide dismutase-mesenchymal stem cells	Treats and prevents radiation damage by promoting antioxidant activity
US20110288178 A1	2011	Epperly et al.	Glyburide (sulfonylurea hypoglycemic drug) and potassium channel inhibitors	Radioprotectant by inhibiting apoptosis
US20110236346 A1	2011	Gelder et al.	Muramyl dipeptide microparticle	Prevents damage of and recovers the hematopoietic system post-radiation
WO2011/053700 A1	2011	Ho Kim et al.	CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100	Mitigates radiation injury by mobilizing progenitor cells
US20110135641 A1	2011	Isenberg et al.	Thrombospondin-1 and/or CD47 inhibitor	Provides radioresistance and advanced healing
US20110218143 A1	2011	Kaushal et al.	Celastrol	Treats radiation damage through tissue repair and hematopoiesis
US7919525 B1	2011	Kumar et al.	γ-tocotrienol (or its succinate) or α-tocopherol succinate	Prevents, mitigates, and treats radiation-induced internal damage
US8007786 B2	2011	Mancini	Mn-SOD	Continual administration protects against radiation damage
US20110028504 A1	2011	Maniar et al.	α, β unsaturated aryl sulfones, ON.1210.Na/Ex-RAD	Protects against and mitigates radiation injury
CN101972239A	2011	Ning et al.	6-Gingerol	Protects against hematopoietic injury induced by radiation
US20110207663 A1	2011	Okunieff et al.	Fibroblast growth factor peptide (FGF-P)	Radiomitigator through hematopoiesis and DNA repair
US20110144024 A1	2011	Petersen et al.	Thrombomodulin	Treatment of diseases produced by ARS
US20110172179 A1	2011	Prasad et al.	Micronutrient formulations	Radioprotector
US7897567 B2	2011	Rudolph et al.	α-thymosin	Protects against GI injury post-radiation
CN102048812A	2011	Saijun et al.	Tulasi leaf extract	Prevents and treats radiation damage through antioxidant properties
RU2475541	2011	Sazykin et al.	Deinoxanthine-carotenoid from Deinococcus radiodurans	Bacterium has radioresistance
US8008347 B2	2011	Schellenberg et al.	Methoxypolyethylene glycol thioester chelate methyl ester	Radioprotector
US20110224221 A1	2011	Sharpless, NE, et al.	Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor	Protects from radiation effects
US8003756 B2	2011	Turdiev	Tetrapeptide FTGN	Radiomitigator through hematopoiesis
CN102389511B	2011	Zhangen et al.	Chinese medicine powder	Radioprotector, low toxicity
US8299277 B2	2012	Anzai et al.	Tocopherol/tocotrienol ester derivatives	Radiomitigator
CA2645550 C	2012	Benner et al.	Small peptide chains (<30 amino acids)	Protects against and treats radiation injury
US20120029071 A1	2012	Biswal et al.	Nrf activators, CDDO-Me (synthetic triterpenoid bardoxolone methyl)	Mitigates through antioxidant activity
US20120046354 A1	2012	Ehrenpreis et al.	Vitamin A (retinyl palmitate)	Radiomitigator/therapy
US20120207687 A1	2012	Falo et al.	Nitroxide agents	Radiomitigator of skin damage
US8252587 B2	2012	Fong et al.	Myeloid progenitor cells	Treats radiation injury by stimulating hematopoiesis
US8304439 B2	2012	Gebicki et al.	1-Methylnicotinamide Chloride, 1,4-Dimethylpyridinium Chloride and 1-Methyl-3-Acetylpyridinium Chloride	Radioprotectors
US20120087994 A1	2012	Guilford et al.	N-Acetyl cysteine (NAC)	Mitigates radiation-induced pulmonary injury
US20120244169 A1	2012	Lipson et al.	Anti-connective tissue growth factor agent	Mitigates radiation injury of heart and lung tissues
US20120283329 A1	2012	Perrine et al.	S-isomer of α-methyl-hydrocinnamic acid	Reduces hematopoietic radiation damage by stimulating myelopoiesis and erythropoiesis
US20120322751 A1	2012	Piljac	Rhamnolipid BAC-3	Mitigates combined injury effects
EP2089401 B1	2012	Richter et al.	Tri-substituted glycerol compounds	Protects against neutron and gamma radiation
US20120321667 A1	2012	Sentman	TCR-deficient T cells	Treats radiation injury through hematopoiesis/therapy
US8288335 B2	2012	Vitek et al.	Truncated ApoE peptide, COG133	Mitigates radiation injury by reducing inflammation
US20130203829 A1	2013	Atkinson et al.	Cyt-C/Cardiolipin complexes (TPP-IOA and TPP-ISA)	Protects and mitigates radiation injury through apoptosis
US20130243873 A1	2013	Aversa et al.	Hydroxylase inhibitor	Mitigates injury by reducing GI inflammation
US8486410 B2	2013	Awasthi et al.	RalBP1	Radioprotector
US8372389 B2	2013	Axelrod et al.	Hyper-IL-6	Prevents radiation-induced xerostomia
US20130243722 A1	2013	Basile et al.	IL-12	Protects from and treats radiation damage
US20130158106 A1	2013	Breen et al.	Tocoflexols	More effective radioprotector than tocols
US20130101574 A1	2013	Carney	Thrombin peptide derivative (TP508)	Mitigates combined injury effects and treats endothelial tissue
WO2013009753 A3	2013	Chandan et al.	Bone marrow stromal cells	Protects from and treats radiation damage
US20130236453 A1	2013	Croce et al.	miR-155-deficient splenocytes	Post-irradiation therapy
US20130164333 A1	2013	Debelak et al.	Immunostimulatory oligoribonucleotides	Mitigates immune suppression due to radiation
US8551530 B2	2013	Elder et al.	Genistein suspension	Radioprotector
US8609655 B2	2013	Geibel et al.	Calcimimetic	Treats epithelial injury post-radiation
WO2013032893 A1	2013	Giaccia et al.	Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (dimethyloxalyl glycine)	Protects and treats GI tract radiation injury-after radiation exposure
US8580321 B2	2013	Gudkov et al.	Bacterial flagellin or its fragments	Protects against radiation-induced hematopoietic and GI damages
US8455250 B2	2013	Heidaran et al.	Placental stem cells and progenitor cells	Reduces extent of radiation injury
US20130273011 A1	2013	Ichim et al.	Endometrial regenerative cells (ERC)	Reduces hematopoietic damage due to radiation
US8349888 B2	2013	Landauer et al.	Genistein or phytoestrogenic isoflavonoids	Protects against and treats radiation injury
US20130216587 A1	2013	Mikaelian	Polarized scorpion venom solution	Mitigates inflammation, therapy
US20130274187 A1	2013	Mogelsvang et al.	SP16 peptide	Mitigates symptoms
US20130316942 A1	2013	Mograbi et al.	Short peptides	Mitigates inflammation
US8563531 B2	2013	Ostroff et al.	β-glucan	Oral radioprotectant through hematopoietic stimulation
US20130344061 A1	2013	Palombella et al.	LY294002	Protects and mitigates radiation damage by inhibiting phosphoinisitide-3 kinase
US8518898 B2	2013	Park et al.	Hesperidin	Radiomitigator
US20130259930 A1	2013	Prendergast, PT	Oltipraz	Radioprotector
US20130123190 A1	2013	Rodgers et al.	NorLeu3-A(1-7)	Treats radiation burns
WO2013138600 A1	2013	Rosen et al.	3,3 ’-Diindolylmethane (DIM)	Prevents radiation damage by activating cell cycle arrest (ATM kinase)
US8562993 B2	2013	Rotolo et al.	Anti-ceramide antibody	Treats and prevents radiation-induced GI syndrome
US20130004584 A1	2013	Rzigalinski et al.	Cerium oxide nanoparticles	Reduces cell damage from free radical exposure
US20130231518 A1	2013	Schiestl et al.	Yel002	Mitigates tissue damage and DNA repair post-radiation
US8524668 B2	2013	Shakhov, A, et al.	NF-κB inducing lipopeptides	Protects against radiation-induced apoptosis
WO2013151698 A1	2013	Vujaskovic et al.	Cerium oxide nanoparticles	Protects against and mitigates radiation injury
US20130267456 A1	2013	Wang et al.	Smad7 protein	Reduces oral inflammation
WO2013181338 A1	2013	Weiler-Guettler et al.	Activated protein c polypeptides	Treats and prevents radiation injury
US8609850 B2	2013	Wipf et al.	Mitochondria-targeted nitroxides	Prevention and treatment of radiation injury
US20130064865 A1	2013	Yen	Submicron protein particles	Treats hematopoietic system post-radiation
EP2689008 A1	2014	Aberman et al.	Adherent stromal cells	Aids in hematopoietic recovery
US20140080785 A1	2014	Baker et al.	Polyglucosamine	Mitigates radiation-induced damage and prevents sepsis
US8685951 B2	2014	Basnakian et al.	Zinc (II) chelates of aminothiols	Protects against and prevents radiation damage through antioxidant properties
US20140088052 A1	2014	Biswal et al.	Chalcone derivatives	Protects against and mitigates radiation injury through hematopoietic recovery
US20140047572 A1	2014	Chen et al.	Thrombopoietin mimetics, Eltrombopag	Reduces bone marrow injury due to radiation
US20140107042 A1	2014	Crapo et al.	α-1 antitrypsin	Prevents cellular damage due to radiation
US20140037674 A1	2014	Dadachova et al.	Melanin	Radioprotector
US20140080876 A1	2014	Denisenko et al.	Substituted nitrostyrene compounds	Protects against radiation injury
US20140065247 A1	2014	Djang	Herbal composition of jiaogulan, hawthorn, and green tea	Prevents or mitigates internal radiation damage
EP2704743 A1	2014	Dudler et al.	Anti MASP-2 inhibitory antibody -complement activation	Protects and mitigates radiation-induced injury to immune system
US20140010822 A1	2014	Fox et al.	Anti-TNF antibody, AVX-470	Aids GI tract recovery due to inflammation
US20140072538 A1	2014	Francki et al.	Amnion-derived adherent cells (AMDACs)	Hematopoietic reconstitution after radiation exposure
US20140142024 A1	2014	Guinan et al.	Bactericidal/permeability increasing protein	Mitigates radiation-induced tissue damage
US20140023612 A1	2014	Heslet	Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administered by inhalation	Reduces radiation effects when administered before, during or after exposure
US8653049 B2	2014	Hipler et al.	Normuramyl glycopeptide compounds	Protects against and treats radiation injury through hematopoiesis
WO2014025832 A1	2014	Kahn et al.	R-spondin1 (Rspo1)	Mitigates GI injury post-radiation
WO2014077358 A1	2014	Kashiwakura et al.	Romiplostim	Treats hematopoietic and GI systems post-radiation
WO2014037927 A1	2014	King-Smith et al.	Chlorate compositions	Mitigates radiation injury, low toxicity
CN103536616A	2014	Liu et al.	Astragalus polysaccharide and astragaloside	Prevents radiation injury
US20140023701 A1	2014	Montesinos et al.	Micronutrient, multivitamin and other compounds	Continual use produces radioprotective and mitigative effects
US20140017339 A1	2014	Pelus et al.	Prostaglandin PGE2 and its regulators (NSAIDs)	Enhances hematopoietic recovery post-radiation exposure
WO2014004409 A2	2014	Ratajczak et al.	Very small embryonic-like stem cells	Treats radiation injury through hematopoietic and immune system recovery
US20140100270 A1	2014	Sherris	Benzo[c]chromen-6-one derivatives	Reduces radiation damage
CN103599265A	2014	Tang et al.	Traditional Chinese medicinal agents	Protects and treats radiation-induced injuries to hematopoietic and immune
WO2014071389 A1	2014	Veech et al.	Ketones or ketogenic substances, (R)-3-hydroxybutyrate ester	Mitigates and prevents tissue damage post-radiation
US8648042 B2	2014	Wang et al.	Glycopeptide with aminothiol moiety	Radiomitigator by free radical quenching
US20140037591 A1	2014	Wessel, HC, et al.	Amnion-derived Cellular Cytokine Solution (ACCS)	Reduces apoptosis

*All applications contain ‘A’ within the last two digits and all patent numbers contain ‘B.’Some of the above patents have been previously filed with another country or region. Their most recent versions are described above. Patent or application references are not provided in this manuscript due to space restrictions. All patents or applications can be easily found using their respective numbers and author information.

ARS: Acute radiation syndrome; GI: Gastrointestinal.

Here, we have reviewed the recent developments of radiation countermeasures for ARS, based on relevant publications and patents. We have placed emphasis on agents in advanced development and agents identified as potential radiation countermeasures since 2011. It is important to note that exact radioprotective mechanisms of action of the majority of these agents under development are complex, involve multiple damage/repair pathways, and are not well understood, but are actively being investigated. However, the majority of radioprotective agents discussed here in this review tend to impact essential cytopoietic feedback loops with given tissues of the body by mimicking the natural ‘lineage-specific regulators’. They act as specific growth regulators tied to secondary feedback loops that ‘sense’ cell content within lineage compartments during steady-state or disequilibrium (cell deficits).

2. Discussion of selected radiation countermeasures under development and new patents

An ideal radiation countermeasure should: i) protect against both acute and chronic radiation damages; ii) be suitable for oral (p.o.) administration with rapid absorption and distribution throughout the body; iii) have no significant toxic side effects including behavioral; iv) be readily available and inexpensive; and v) be chemically stable for easy handling, transport and storage for field use [14]. No single candidate drug has all of these ideal features, although many of the potential radiation countermeasures currently identified have not yet been fully characterized (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Brief diagrammatic representation of radiation injury and the mode of action of radiation countermeasures at advanced stages of development. This simplified response pathway of a subject’s irradiation shows that radiation exposure induces free radicals, DNA breaks and apoptosis. The various radiation countermeasures reduce the injurious effects of irradiation through different pathways as indicated by colored arrows. Only the drugs with well-understood mechanism of action are included and may have been indicated at multiple points, as several drugs work through several pathways. Red arrows indicate inhibition of deleterious effects of radiation injury and green arrows indicate enhancement of recovery.

2.1 Radiation countermeasures in advanced stages of development with US FDA investigational new drug status

The following seven drugs are currently in advanced development and have been granted US FDA investigational new drug (IND) status: 5-Androstenediol (5-AED)/Neumune, beclomethasone 17,21-dipropionate (BDP)/OrbeShield, BIO 300 (Genistein), CBLB502/Entolimod, HemaMax/NMIL12-1 (recombinant human interleukin-12: rHuIL-12), ON01210/Ex-RAD/Recilisib and filgrastim/Neupogen (G-CSF). Each of these drugs is discussed in the Section immediately below; however, G-CSF has been reviewed in conjunction with GM-CSF in a later Section (2.2), as both have similar mechanisms of action and efficacies, have been used as an off-label ARS treatment and may receive FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). All above countermeasures with FDA IND have a strong possibility for clinical use in the future, but the final outcome will largely depend on the results of clinical trials (safety and toxicity) being conducted with these drugs. Detailed results of such trials with all the agents are not available at this moment.

2.1.1 5-AED/Neumune

5-AED (androst-5-ene-3β,17β-diol) was the first drug to receive US FDA IND status as a radiation countermeasure specifically for treatment and prevention of ARS. It was investigated as both a radioprotector and radiomitigator and was advanced by Hollis-Eden Pharmaceuticals (San Diego, CA, USA) [15-17]. Studies showed a single injection of 5-AED, before or after a lethal dose of total-body irradiation (TBI), enhanced survival in mice; drug administration post-irradiation had a lower efficacy than a pre-irradiation injection [15,18,19]. The radiomitigator efficacy of 5-AED was confirmed with both mice and nonhuman primates (NHPs) [16,20]. 5-AED treatments improved overall blood profiles, including blood platelet levels [15-17,21]. 5-AED significantly increased blood plasma levels of both G-CSF and IL-6 in mice; subsequent ‘neutralization studies’ suggested that G-CSF was, in part, responsible for the drug’s survival enhancement [22]. 5-AED also induced BAX and BCL-2, upregulated CDKN1A and DDB1 (but not GADD45a) expressions and limited DNA strand breakage in splenocytes from irradiated mice [23]. In sum, these results suggest that 5-AED survival enhancement is G-CSF-dependent, and it reduces radiation-induced DNA damage via induction of genes that modulate cell cycle progression and apoptosis. Clinical trials suggest that parenteral (intraperitoneal, i.p.) administration of 5-AED may be a safe and effective means to stimulate innate immunity and alleviate ARS-associated neutropenia and thrombocytopenia [24]. The results of clinical trials are not available in publication.

2.1.2 BDP/OrbeShield

BDP is a highly potent, topically active corticosteroid being developed by Soligenix, Inc. (Princeton, NJ, USA) as a radiation countermeasure for GI syndrome [25]. It provides a potent topical anti-inflammatory effect with less systemic toxicity than a comparably effective systemic corticosteroid. OrbeShield demonstrated a statistically significant survival advantage in a canine model of GI sub-syndrome [25]. Canines received TBI, followed by autologous bone marrow infusion and supportive care. The experiment had three groups: one control group (no drug given) and two treatment groups with varying treatment schedules. Both BDP-treated groups had significantly enhanced survival compared with the control group [26]. These findings suggest that BDP has the potential to rescue inflamed tissues in the radiation-damaged GI mucosa and improve survival when therapy is initiated as late as 24 h after high-dose irradiation, which is relevant to the problem of identifying and developing appropriate medical countermeasures for the GI sub-syndrome. The FDA has granted IND status, orphan drug and fast-track statuses to OrbeShield, which has been formulated as a single product consisting of two tablets for p.o. administration to patients with GI ARS; one tablet is intended to release BDP in the proximal and the other in the distal portions of the GI tract [25]. There is no report regarding clinical trial with this agent yet. BDP has been marketed in the US as the active pharmaceutical ingredient in a nasal spray and in a metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma.

2.1.3 BIO 300

Isoflavone (4′,5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone), known as genistein, is a phytoestrogen, antioxidant (free-radical scavenger) and protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor that modulates signal transduction pathways and is being developed by Humanetics Pharmaceuticals (Minneapolis, MN, USA) under the name BIO 300 [13,27,28].

The FDA has granted orphan drug designation and IND status to BIO 300 for the prevention of ARS. Genistein protects mice against the potential lethal effects of ⁶⁰Co γ-radiation when administered before TBI [29,30]. The dose reduction factor (DRF) for genistein is 1.16 when administered subcutaneous (sc). Multiple oral doses of genistein significantly protected mice against γ-irradiation [31,32]. When administered before irradiation, genistein reduces lung injury in mice [33]. Genistein stimulated induction of low levels of hematopoietic cytokines [34]. A single sc or intramuscular injection of genistein before irradiation provided significant radioprotection to the hematopoietic system of the exposed animal, including both the proliferating/differential myeloid elements, as well as the progenitorial marrow compartments [31,35]. Pretreatment with sc genistein appears to limit radiation-induced senescence of primitive hematopoietic tissue repopulating progenitors,that is, LSK (lineage^- Sca-1⁺ c-kit⁺) cells [36]. LKS progenitors from genistein-treated mice expressed fewer DNA damage-responsive and cell-cycle checkpoint genes than did LSK cells from untreated or vehicle-treated mice. Interestingly, a combination of sc injected genistein and orally administered captopril (ACE inhibitor, a vasodilation drug) increased the radioprotective efficacy of genistein in C57Bl/6J mice [37].

The effectiveness of p.o. genistein is limited by relatively poor bioavailability. However, nanoparticle formulations have produced an easy-to-use p.o. or intramuscular (i.m.) preparation that can be taken without medical supervision [38]. The nanoparticle formulation injected i.m. was shown to afford mouse protection, increase bone marrow cellularity and decrease radiation-induced death of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [39]. Humanetics Pharmaceuticals has conducted a Phase I clinical trial and reported that BIO 300 is safe and well tolerated when administered p.o. for 14 days in healthy volunteers [38].

2.1.4 CBLB502/Entolimod

CBLB502, a truncated derivative of the Salmonella bacteria (Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin) flagellin protein, is a potent and stable agent, currently being clinically developed as a radiation countermeasure by Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. (Buffalo, NY, USA) [40]. Its pharmacologic action is based on its binding to toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) of targeted cells and activating NF-κB signaling (Figure 3), which modulates expression of numerous genes, including inhibitors of apoptosis, scavengers of reactive oxygen species and a spectrum of cytokines. Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. identified CBLB502 as a TLR5 ligand that significantly improved the radioprotective efficacy of native flagellin, while having significantly reduced toxicity and immunogenicity [41].

Figure 3. Schematic representation of TLR-ligand-mediated NF-κB activation. TLR ligands (multiple, not all radioprotective) interact with TLR receptor inducing two divergent signaling pathways controlled by two pairs of adaptor proteins: TRAM/TRIF and TIRAP/MyD88. The MyD88-dependent pathway quickly upregulates inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB activation by its dissociation from inhibitory component (IκB). This permits NF-κB to enter the nucleus where it can ‘turn on’ the expression of specific genes such as inflammatory or immune response, a cell survival response, cellular proliferation and oxygen-scavenging MnSOD. The MyD88-independent pathway does this as well, in addition to inducing type-1 IFN expression through IRFs and triggering IFN-β, which results in cell maturation. MyD88-independent pathways are activated with slower kinetics. Radiation produces ROS, which also activate NF-γB.

Purified flagellin protects mice from lethal doses of γ-TBI [42]. A single injection of CBLB502 between 24 h before and 48 h after lethal TBI protected mice from both GI and hematopoietic sub-syndromes with significantly improved survival [43]. Similar radioprotective and radiomitigative potentials are documented in lethally irradiated NHPs [41].

Two cytokines, G-CSF and IL-6, were identified as candidate biomarkers for CBLB502’s radioprotective and radiomitigative efficacies and were found to be crucial for CBLB502’s ability to increase survival of irradiated animals; administration of either G-CSF or IL-6 neutralizing antibody abrogated its protection in acutely irradiated rodents [44]. These biomarkers will likely be useful in accurately predicting the radioprotective or radiomitigative dose of CBLB502 in humans. Like other radiation countermeasures, the FDA has granted IND, fast-track and orphan drug statuses to CBLB502 as a radiation countermeasure. It is currently in clinical development, and a human safety study indicated that CBLB502 was systemically well tolerated and had biomarker results corresponding to previous biomarkers data from animal ARS models [44,45]. Cleveland BioLabs, Inc. is preparing EUA application for submission to the FDA.

2.1.5 HemaMax/NMIL12-1

HemaMax is rhuIL-12, a heterodimeric cytokine shown to play an important role in regulating inflammatory responses, stimulating IFN-γ production from natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages and T cells [46,47]. Mouse-specific IL-12 demonstrated increased mice survival when a single dose was administered either 24 h before or within 1 h after TBI exposure [48,49]. Currently, rhuIL-12 is being developed as a radiomitigator by Neumedicines, Inc. (Pasadena, CA, USA). The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of mouse and human IL-12 in mice and rhesus NHP (Macaca mulatta), respectively, have been reported [50]. Allometrically equivalent doses of Mouse HemaMax and (human) HemaMax preparations significantly increased mouse and NHP survival, respectively, when administered 24 h post-irradiation with similar pharmacokinetics. In the NHP study, survival benefit was accompanied by a higher leukocyte, thrombocyte and reticulocyte counts during nadir (12 – 14 days) and less body weight loss when compared to vehicle. These results provided ‘proof of concept’ that HemaMax increases survival in irradiated NHPs by promoting hematopoiesis and recovery of immune function and GI function. Recently, another group confirmed the radiomitigation potential of rhuIL-12 in NHPs [51]. Murine HemaMax has also been evaluated in the mouse model of combined injury (radiation and wound). Topical administration after radiation exposure has been demonstrated to enhance wound closure suggesting that it could serve as a multifunctional mitigator of combined injuries [52].

Neumedicines reported a significant increase in survival, when NHPs were treated with a single, low dose of rhuIL-12. This study had additional treatment groups that received G-CSF for 18 consecutive days and another that received G-CSF for 18 consecutive days in combination with a single dose of rhuIL-12. No antibiotics, fluids or blood products were administered. Single rhuIL-12 treatments significantly decreased frequency of severe neutropenia (< 100 cells/μl) and severe thrombocytopenia (< 10,000 cells/μl) when compared to vehicle or G-CSF treatment groups. The combination of G-CSF plus rhuIL-12 appeared to augment the recovery of trilineal hematopoiesis to a greater extent than with just rhuIL-12; however, this did not translate to improved survival. These data demonstrate that G-CSF can be safely administered after rhuIL-12. However, it needs to be noted that essential elements of study needed for comparisons (drug dose, radiation doses and animal monitoring periods) are not available on Neumedicine’s website [46]. Additionally, these results conflict with those of a recent study that demonstrated, for the first time, a benefit for G-CSF administered post-irradiation along with an intensive, trigger-based medical management regimen [53].

To demonstrate the safety of HemaMax, Neumedicines conducted a Phase Ib study where healthy human volunteers were administered a single dose predicted to be effective in humans for treating hematopoietic syndrome based on NHP data; this trial suggests rhuIL-12 to be safe and well tolerated at this dose [46]. An additional study investigating the mechanism of action of rhuIL-12 in healthy human subjects suggests that rhuIL-12 administration induced IL-12Rβ2⁺, CD16⁺CD56⁺ NK cell migration from the peripheral blood into the tissue compartment, through a mechanism facilitated by IFN-γ-induced CXCL10 chemokine and its receptor CXCR3 [46].

The above studies suggest that rhuIL-12 has potential to be an effective radiation mitigator against radiation lethality. Neumedicines is advancing the development of rhuIL-12 towards a Biologic License Application submission to the FDA under the Animal Efficacy Rule for the treatment of the hematopoietic sub-syndrome of ARS [54].

2.1.6 ON01210/Ex-RAD/Recilisib

ON01210 (a chlorobenzyl sulfone derivative) is a novel, small-molecule kinase inhibitor in development as a radiation countermeasure by Onconova Therapeutics (Newtown, PA, USA), also known as Ex-RAD/Recilisib. Unlike most radioprotectors, Ex-RAD is not a free-radical scavenger or responsible for cell cycle arrest. Available data suggest that Ex-RAD has a novel mechanism for radiation protection involving DNA repair pathways [55,56]. Ex-RAD provided significant protection against ⁶⁰Co γ-irradiation when administered to mice before radiation exposure sc or p.o. [57]. Ex-RAD’s estimated DRF is 1.16 (sc, prophylactic) [55]. Ex-RAD’s radiomitigative properties have been explored as well but less extensively than its radioprotective properties. Ex-RAD provided mitigation to acutely irradiated mice when the drug was administered after radiation exposure [58]. To examine Ex-RAD’s efficacy, additional studies are needed using higher, whole-body radiation doses. Ex-RAD clearly protects the hematopoietic system, increasing survival of irradiated mice; administration quickly alleviates the severe, radiation-induced pancytopenia and restores selected marrow functions [57,59]. Mechanistically, Ex-RAD appears to protect both marrow cells and intestinal crypt cells from radiation-induced apoptosis [59]. These protective actions may be due, in part, to signaling pathways that are affected by Ex-RAD. Attenuation of ATM-p53-mediated DNA damage response (DDR) by Ex-RAD likely contributes to the mitigation of radiation-induced hematopoietic toxicity [56]. Further, Ex-RAD appears to function through the upregulation of PI3-kinase/AKT pathways in cells exposed to radiation [60].

The Defense Medical Research and Development Program (US Department of Defense), and Biomedical Advanced Research Development Authority (BARDA) (Health and Human Services) have funded research to study the efficacy and identify biomarkers in the NHP animal. These studies will be conducted at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Onconova Therapeutics has completed four Phase I clinical studies using Ex-RAD in healthy volunteers. Three of these trials administered Ex-RAD sc and one, p.o.; none of these trials reported evidence of systemic side effects [61]. Oral administration holds better clinical promise as an effective countermeasure for first responders as well as for at-risk civilian populations in a nuclear accident. Among promising radiation countermeasures with US FDA IND, only Ex-RAD, OrbeShield and BIO 300 have demonstrated efficacy when administered through the p.o. route. However, due to BIO 300’s multiple dosing requirement for efficacy, this drug is somewhat less attractive than Ex-RAD (two doses) for development as a general medical countermeasure for ARS.

2.2 Cytokines that may be approved by US FDA for EUA – already used off-label for radiation accident victims

The two growth factors G-CSF and GM-CSF may receive full licensing approval by the FDA. Neither is FDA approved for treating ARS; however, both growth factors are currently included in the Strategic National Stockpile [62]. As stated earlier, G-CSF, but not GM-CSF, has FDA IND status [63].

2.2.1 G-CSF

The radioprotective efficacy of G-CSF has been evaluated in different strains of mice [64-67], canines (beagle) [68-72], NHPs [53] and recently, minipigs [73]. Because G-CSF is not species-specific, a majority of these studies have used human recombinant G-CSF (Neupogen/filgrastim, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA), although some used the pegylated form of G-CSF (Neulasta/pegfilgrastim, Amgen, Inc.) or G-CSF from other sources. The results of these numerous studies suggest that G-CSF consistently enhanced survival and blood leukocytes (neutrophils) recovery across species (mice, canine, minipig and NHP) regardless of radiation source (γ-ray, X-ray). G-CSF has also been shown to be an effective mitigator of injury against mixed field irradiation (neutron and γ-photon) in mice [74]. The radioprotective efficacy of G-CSF is dependent not only on the extent of radiation exposure but also on the drug dose, treatment schedule in relation to radiation exposure and duration of the treatment. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently has an IND application (with the US FDA) containing a clinical protocol for how G-CSF/filgrastim would be administered to exposed victims in the event of a radiological nuclear incident [63].

Neulasta and Maxy-G34 are pegylated versions of native G-CSF that have well-documented radioprotective, survival-promoting efficacies against potential lethal radiation exposures of both mice and NHPs [75]. Studies clearly demonstrated that pegfilgrastim can be administered in very limited fashion and still retain the therapeutic benefits of more extensive dosing regimens required by filgrastim, for example, 2 weekly injections of pegfilgrastim are equivalent or significantly better in virtually all measured parameters that reflect granulopoiesis compared to 17 – 21 days of daily filgrastim injections [76].

An additional study demonstrated that while pegylated G-CSF limits the severity of the radiation-induced cytopenias in an ARS rodent model, this agent appears to be less efficacious in treating irradiated animals with substantial skin burns (15% total body surface area skin burns) [77]. Although G-CSF (filgrastim) has not been tested in the murine model of irradiation and burn, G-CSF appears to protect both irradiated and combined injury (irradiation and wounded) mice.

2.2.2 GM-CSF

The radioprotective efficacy of GM-CSF (sargramostim/Leukine) has been evaluated in mice, canines and NHPs [68,78,79]. Unlike G-CSF, GM-CSF is species-specific. rhuGM-CSF and recombinant canine GM-CSF have been used in NHP and canine studies, respectively. Sargramostim can be used instead of recombinant mouse GM-CSF for murine studies.

GM-CSF enhances the recovery of blood leukocyte levels in various strains of mice [78,80-82], canines [68,83,84] and NHPs [79,85,86] when administered alone or in combination with other cytokines. Like G-CSF, GM-CSF administration decreased the severity and duration of neutropenia, enhanced neutrophil recovery, along with overall recovery of blood leukocyte counts, and increased granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units in the bone marrow. However, survival benefits of GM-CSF treatment are inconsistent between studies; the causes of inconsistency could not be definitively identified because of the dissimilarities in preparation, sources of GM-CSF and the various study designs. Results available in the published literature consistently support recovery from severe neutropenia as a benefit of using GM-CSF in hematopoietic ARS. In mice and canine studies where the efficacies of G-CSF and GM-CSF have been compared side by side, G-CSF was found to be more effective in protecting irradiated animals [69,81].

2.3 Other promising molecules at advanced stages of development

Additional radiation countermeasures in advanced stages of development include: amifostine, γ-tocotrienol and myeloid progenitors.

2.3.1 Amifostine/Ethyol

Amifostine (WR2721, 2-(3-aminopropyl) aminoethylphosphorothioate), is the only systemically effective radioprotective agent that has been fully approved (June 1999) for human use by the US FDA [87-90]. Despite the FDA’s approval, the drug has only been authorized for use for a very narrowly defined medical indication, namely the reduction of xerostomia (dry mouth) that results from injury of salivary glands in patients undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of head and neck cancers [91]. The secondary indication for amifostine’s use (and approval) is for the cytoprotection of irradiated oral epithelium and the prevention of oral mucositis. Despite this very limited drug indication, amifostine is well recognized as a potent cytoprotectant for many of the body’s major organ systems when administered at sufficiently large doses (i.e., 300 – 500 mg/kg). In rodent models of ARS and depending on the dose of amifostine administered, DRFs have been estimated to range from 1.6 to 3.0 for hematopoietic and from 1.6 to 2.1 for GI syndrome [87]. In general, the drug doses cited above are well within the range of doses currently prescribed (∼ 200 mg/m²/d delivered slowly by intravenous [i.v.] infusions or ∼ 500 mg/kg/d delivered slowly by sc injection). Under standard dosing regimens, amifostine is generally well tolerated by the majority of patients; serious side effects are rare; however, minor toxic responses occur frequently which include nausea, vomiting and adverse cutaneous reactions following sc injection. It is because of these performance-decrementing side effects that amifostine has not been approved for general use in radiation protection of high-risk personnel or the population at large. Alternative indications have been proposed for amifostine including: i) global cytoprotection with significant survival benefit when administered at high drug doses, notwithstanding the potential risks of toxic side effects; ii) selective protection of specific progenitorial tissue compartments at low drug doses [92]; and iii) protection against late-arising, radiation induced cancers with low drug doses [14].

In addition to the side effects, there are other limitations in using this drug for nonclinical purposes. First, amifostine is currently administered by i.v. infusion; other routes of drug delivery have been explored but remain to be authorized by the FDA. Second, amifostine has an extremely short, pre-exposure time-window of radioprotectiveness (i.e., generally < 1 h).

Despite amifostine’s limitations, it is hard to dismiss the drug as a viable radioprotectant for nonclinical applications; amifostine is a remarkably effective, potent and systemically active drug that has the capacity not only to provide substantial cytoprotection to various vital bodily tissues, but also to promote survival in otherwise fatal nuclear/radiological exposure situations. Notwithstanding the potential toxic side effects of the drug, amifostine might be effectively administered (or self-administered) to general populations who are not tasked to perform essential emergency tasks (e.g., at risk, general resident populations being asked to ‘shelter-in-place’).

It was logical to test whether amifostine could enhance the radioprotective efficacy of another drug that acts through a different pathway, such as γ-tocotrienol (GT3). Amifostine (doses of 30 and 50 mg/kg) enhanced efficacy of a significantly low dose of GT3 (50 mg/kg, optimal dose of GT3 is 200 mg/kg in mice). This study suggests that both agents can be used at lower doses and still achieve optimal radioprotection against a lethal dose of radiation without producing adverse effects (Vijay K. Singh – unpublished observation).

Despite the modest advancements in maximizing amifostine’s radioprotective utility, none of the strategies to make use of amifostine have entirely eliminated the problem of amifostine’s toxicity. Although the work on amifostine and related aminothiols has been promising in terms of developing and fielding a safe and effective radioprotector, additional research is clearly needed in order to improve current drug design and delivery strategies.

2.3.2 γ-Tocotrienol

GT3 is one of the eight isomers (tocols) of vitamin E [93]. It is a potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase [94,95]. In recent years, GT3 appears to be one of the more promising radioprotective tocols tested to date. GT3 has been shown to increase survival in rodents, through ameliorating the radiation-induced injuries of the hematopoietic and GI systems [96,97]. When administered sc 24 h before irradiation, GT3 significantly protected mice against radiation and had an estimated DRF of 1.29 based on survival of CD2F1 mice. GT3 treatment accelerated hematopoietic recovery, improved peripheral blood profiles, enhanced recovery of hematopoietic progenitors in marrow of irradiated mice and induced relatively high levels of G-CSF and IL-6 in mice [98-100]. Studies suggested the most efficacious time for GT3 administration is 24 h prior to irradiation, possibly due to the induction of key hematopoietic cytokines. Prophylactic GT3 administration upregulates anti-apoptotic genes and downregulates pro-apoptotic genes [101]. Jejunal crypt analysis showed protection of GI tissue by GT3 treatment. The protective action of GT3 can be abrogated by G-CSF-specific antibody [102].

The radioprotective efficacy of GT3 has been tested at two drug dosing levels without supportive care in a NHP model of radiation-induced ARS. Three different radiation doses were used in this study. Results demonstrate that the GT3 treatments significantly decreased the duration and the severity of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (Vijay K. Singh – unpublished observation). It is important to note that GT3 when administered in one dose, was comparable to results achieved using multiple G-CSF administrations in combination with supportive care, in terms of improving the radiation-induced neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Another isomer of vitamin E, delta-tocotrienol, has demonstrated comparable radioprotective efficacy in the murine model [103-107].

2.3.3 AEOL 10150

AEOL 10150 (meso-porphyrin mimetic; C₄₈H₅₆C₁₅MnN₁₂) is a radiation countermeasure being developed by Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Mission Viejo, CA, USA). AEOL 10150 is a novel, well-tolerated (as evidenced in initial clinical trials) antioxidant with significant protective and mitigative potential relative to acute radiation injuries, particularly acute pulmonary injury [108-112]. Extended survival and minimization of acute pathology has been demonstrated using sustained, drug dosing regimens of AEOL 10150 (e.g., daily treatments for 28 days) using both murine and NHP models [113]. Garofalo et al. investigated whether administration of AEOL 10150 after thoracic exposures in NHPs could reduce radiation-induced lung injury and improve overall survival [114]. Results indicated that daily drug administrations, beginning after irradiation, effectively mitigated potentially fatal radiation-induced lung injury and improved survival. Plasma analysis suggested that AEOL 10150 treatment led to lower TGF-β1 levels. AEOL 10150 treatments resulted in significant reductions of radiation-induced lung injury, as evidenced by reduced clinically, radiographically, anatomically and by molecular markers of injury.

This agent is also being investigated as a countermeasure for GI and, if successful, it may be exceedingly useful for treating multiple sub-syndromes of ARS that occur following very high radiation exposures, which is difficult to manage clinically [111]. The drug captures and neutralizes reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generated by ionizing radiation, in turn reducing oxidative stress, inflammation and signals in injury-eliciting tissue damage signaling cascades.

2.3.4 Myeloid progenitor cells

Myeloid progenitor cell (MPC) are being developed as a cellular bridging therapy, administered after radiation exposure, to provide hematopoietic cellular support, allowing bone marrow stem cells to repopulate the blood system. Administration of pooled, cryopreserved allogeneic mouse MPC (mMPC) significantly improved 30-day survival of lethally irradiated recipient mice [115]. mMPC transfusion appears to mitigate multi-organ failure occurring at extremely high doses of irradiation; the DRF of 5 million mMPC administered 24 h post-irradiation to CD2F1 mice is 1.73. Jejunum histopathology of irradiated and mMPC-transfused mice revealed improved structural integrity; the infusion of mMPC significantly decreased the number of bacterial infections and lowered endotoxin levels in serum [116]. These studies support the contention that the transfusion of MPC acts as a bridging therapy for both the hematopoietic system and GI system.

The following additional characteristics make MPC a potentially ideal treatment for sizable numbers of nuclear/radiological exposure accident victims: i) MPCs can be cryopreserved and stored without compromise in function and ii) treatment can be delayed up to 7 days and still provide survival benefit. However, promising, additional studies are required to identify cell populations differentiated from myeloid progenitors and rule out graft versus host disease. These preclinical studies need to be transitioned to work using large animal models, to provide long-term follow-up of recipients receiving different radiation doses and to study the clearance of donor cells from recipients which may depend on the extent of their radiation injury.

Cellerant Therapeutics, Inc. (San Carlos, CA, USA) is developing CLT-008, a unique, cell-based therapy containing human myeloid progenitors as a treatment for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and as an adjunct to cord blood transplantation [117]. Derived from adult hematopoietic stem cells, it has the ability to mature into functional granulocytes, platelets and red blood cells in vivo and is currently in a Phase I study. Cellerant Therapeutics also has product CLT-009 under development for treatment of thrombocytopenia.

2.4 Agents identified recently and under early stages of development

Although large numbers of agents have been identified recently and are currently under development, we have selected only those agents that have animal survival data published in peer-reviewed papers. Additional agents presented during conferences but lacking peer-reviewed publications such as cesium oxide nanoparticles, AVX-470m (a murine TNF-specific surrogate of AVX-470, a novel polyclonal anti-TNF antibody), CDX-301, TP508, Yel002 and CJ010 (analog of Yel002), metformin and N-acetyl cysteine have not been included in this article.

2.4.1 ALXN4100TPO

ALXN4100TPO is a novel thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, synthesized by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cheshire, CT, USA) to reduce the potential of endogenous generation of TPO antibody. With no sequence homology to the native TPO glycoprotein, ALXN4100TPO’s binding kinetics to TPO’s receptor is equipotent to the native molecule, as demonstrated in an in vitro receptor assay. The synthetic agonist has been shown to stimulate megakaryopoiesis in two different mouse strains and effectively prevents radiation-induced lethality in mice by abrogating thrombocytopenia and bone marrow atrophy [118]. Estimated DRFs in irradiated mice are 1.32 when administered prophylactically and 1.11 when delivered 12 h post-exposure [114]. Reports indicate that ALXN4100TPO administered sc results in stimulated extramedullary hematopoiesis, with no immediate, life-threatening adverse health effects [119]. Although ALXN 4100TPO has some efficacy as a radiation countermeasure against γ-radiation, it did not provide protection against mixed field γ and neutron radiations [74]. The agent’s potential for adverse, long-term health effects need to be thoroughly evaluated.

2.4.2 Palifermin

Palifermin is a recombinant N-terminal truncated form of keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), also known as fibroblast growth factor 7 (FGF7). KGF, produced by mesenchymal cells to protect and repair epithelial tissues, acts on its targets through the FGFR2B receptor. KGF significantly promotes the recovery of mucosa from radiation-induced injury [120]. KGF also improves epithelial barrier functions after irradiation and limits bacterial translocation and subsequent sepsis (Seed et al. – unpublished observations). Palifermin-protective action appears to be due to a combination of proliferation stimulation and anti-apoptotic actions [121]. Preclinical studies suggest that palifermin ameliorates mucosal toxicity of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy [121]. Palifermin reduces the incidence, duration and severity of oral mucositis in chemoradiotherapy patients with head and neck cancers as well as patients receiving other chemotherapy agents causing mucositis. Palifermin has also mitigated esophagitis-induced dysphagia in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for lung carcinoma. Interestingly, palifermin also appears to stimulate immune reconstitution following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and to reduce graft versus host disease following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation [122].

2.4.3 Superoxide dismutase

Over-expression of manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD, also called SOD2) by injection of a replication-deficient adenovirus containing the MnSOD transgene conferred protection against lung irradiation and cytokine production (IL-1, TNF-α and TGF-β) when administered prior to irradiation [123]. MnSOD appears to protect against radiation-induced apoptosis in cultured cell lines, in part, by stabilizing the mitochondrial membrane [124]. In a mouse model of radiation-induced oral mucositis, p.o. administration of MnSOD decreased radiation-induced ulceration [125]. These findings suggest the possibility of utilizing radioprotective antioxidant gene therapy to prevent or reduce the extent of some forms of radiation injury. Following 9.5 Gy TBI, MnSOD-treated mice that developed and recovered from ARS and fed a diet rich in antioxidants showed an increased lifespan when compared to comparably treated and ARS-recovered mice that had been fed only the standard house diet [126]. These findings suggest that when combined with MnSOD treatments, enriched antioxidant/chemopreventive diets have the potential to increase the lifespans of ARS survivors.

2.4.4 Captopril and ACE inhibitors

Captopril, a competitive inhibitor of ACE protease, was initially developed for hypertension and heart failure treatment; later, it was found to increase renal plasma flow and improve glomerular filtration in animal models of radiation-induced renal dysfunction [127,128]. Captopril has been investigated as a radiation countermeasure for the pulmonary, renal and hematopoietic systems as well as brain and skin [129-134]. ACE inhibitors and captopril mitigated radiation-induced pulmonary endothelial dysfunction, radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis in animal models [135,136]. Prophylactic administration of captopril lowered systemic blood pressure and improved renal function following TBI in animal models and reduced chronic renal failure in human radiation therapy patients [128,137-139]. Additionally, captopril and perindopril, another ACE inhibitor, were demonstrated to limit radiation-induced cytopenias through maintenance and recovery of blood cell levels, which has been reported as specifically associated with protection and regrowth of selected hematopoietic progenitor populations [129,140]. These observations need to be confirmed in large animal models of radiation-induced ARS. The mechanism(s) of captopril-induced reduction of radiation injury has not been firmly established, but it is believed to be related to thiol-mediated ‘free-radical scavenging.’

2.4.5 3,3′-Diindolylmethane

3,3′-Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a small molecule compound formed when indole-3-carbinol (I3C) is hydrolyzed in the stomach [141]. DIM is a proposed ‘cancer prevention’ nutritional supplement and has been administered safely to humans in repeated oral doses in Phase I/II clinical trials [142-145]. A multi-dose schedule of DIM, initiated before or after irradiation, protected rodents against lethal doses of TBI [146]. When i.p. DIM treatment was started 24 h after irradiation, the estimated DRF was 1.6. This work needs to be confirmed, using an appropriate large animal model. Submicromolar DIM concentrations protected cultured cells against radiation by a novel mechanism; DIM caused rapid activation of Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and phosphorylation of various ATM substrates, suggesting that DIM induces an ATM-dependent DDR-like response, enhances radiation-induced ATM signaling and NF-κB activation. Similarly, DIM caused ATM activation and signaling in normal tissues in rodents.

2.4.6 Oltipraz

Oltipraz (a synthetic dithiolethione derived from broccoli) administered prior to γ-TBI, increased mouse survival, decreased radiation-induced lipid peroxidation and acid phosphatase, decreased radiation induced inhibition of glutathione and alkaline phosphatase, as well as reduced chromosomal aberration and micronuclei formation [147]. Although the authors reported improvement in GI-related parameters, it is unlikely that a dose of 8 Gy (LD_50/30 reported as 6.6 Gy) would have induced substantial damage in GI. An earlier report appears to support these findings concerning Oltipraz’s improved irradiated mice survival at mid-lethal doses but failed to show any significant sparing effect on hematopoiesis. This interesting finding might well suggest that the drug’s protective effects are limited to and associated with enhanced expression of microsomal epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase genes [148]. Because of the hematological anomalies noted in these reports, additional preclinical work is needed.

2.4.7 Phosphoinisitide-3 kinase inhibitor (LY294002)

Ionizing radiation induces genotoxic stress that triggers adaptive cellular responses, such as activation of the phosphoinisitide-3 kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling cascade. A single dose of LY294002 (CID3973) or PX-867 (CID24798773) administered after a lethal dose of γ-irradiation significantly enhanced mouse survival [149]. Cell cycle checkpoints are important regulators of cell survival after radiation exposure; cell cycles after γ-irradiation and PI3K inhibitor treatment was investigated [149]. LY294002 and PX-867 treatment decreased the proportion of S phase cells and increased the G1 population. Post-radiation LY294002 and PX-867 treatment also increased the G1 and G2 populations and decreased S phase and DNA damage as measured by γ-H2AX [149]. These results indicate pharmacologic inhibition of PI3K after irradiation abrogates cell death. These observations suggest that rational drug design, based on specific pharmacological ‘targeting’ for radiomitigation need to be more actively and aggressively pursued.

2.4.8 FGF-peptide, a dimerized peptide derived from FGF2

Various members of the FGF family have been reported to mitigate radiation-induced damage [150,151]. FGF-peptide (FGF-P) (synthetic binding domain peptide of FGF-2 with a peptidase resistant dimer form) attenuates both sepsis and bleeding in a radiation-induced hematopoietic syndrome model and reduces the severity of GI and cutaneous syndromes [152]. FGF-P induces little or no deleterious inflammation or vascular leakage, distinguishing it from other growth factors, angiogenic factors and cytokines. Although recombinant FGFs have proven safe in several ongoing clinical trials, they are expensive to synthesize, can only be produced in limited quantity and have limited shelf life. FGF-P has the positive features without the disadvantages. One study shows FGF-P to be a potent, safe, broad-spectrum radiation mitigator, showing promise for thermal burns, ischemic wound healing, tissue engineering and stem-cell regeneration. FGF-P stimulated the growth of bone marrow cells harvested from irradiated mice; the number of leukocytes, granulocytes, pro-B and pre-B cells increased with treatment. In vivo FGF-P treatment increased the long-term hematopoietic stem cells in bone marrow [153]. These data reveal the underlying cellular basis by which FGF-P rescued a significant percentage of the exposed mice.

2.4.9 R-spondin1

Human R-spondin1 (Rspo1), a 29 kDa, 263 amino acid protein, acts as a mitogenic factor for intestinal stem cells; therefore, it was hypothesized that its systemic administration would amplify intestinal crypt cells, accelerate regeneration of irradiated intestine and ameliorate radiation-induced GI syndrome. Mice receiving recombinant adenovirus expressing human Rspo1 (a potent Wnt signal enhancer and one of the four analogs of R-spondin) before potentially lethal TBI or local abdominal irradiation had higher survival than the control group. Histological analysis demonstrated significant structural regeneration of the intestine in treated and irradiated animals. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increase in Lgr5+ve crypt cells, translocation of β-catenin from the cytosol to nucleus and upregulation of β-catenin target genes in treated mice. The mechanism was likely related to induction of the Wnt-β-catenin pathway and promotion of intestinal stem cell regeneration [154].

2.4.10 2-((3-(1,3-dioxo-1H-benzo[de]isoquinolin-2(3H)-yl)propyl)thio)benzoic acid (LPA2, GRI977143)

Recently, prototypic non-lipid agonist, GRI977143, has been reported to rescue in vitro and in vivo cells from high-dose γ-irradiation-induced apoptosis. GRI977143 is effective in rescuing mice from lethal irradiation when administered after TBI [155]. This study suggests that by specifically activating lipid mediator lysophosphatidic acid receptor subtype (LPA2), GRI977143 activates the ERK1/2 pro-survival pathway, effectively reducing BAX translocation to the mitochondrion, attenuating the activation of initiator and effector caspases, reducing DNA fragmentation and inhibiting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) cleavage associated with γ-irradiation-induced apoptosis. GRI977143 also inhibits bystander apoptosis elicited by soluble pro-apoptotic mediators produced by irradiated cells.

2.4.11 Somatostatin analog (SOM230)

The somatostatin analog, SOM230, has potent radioprotective and radiomitigative effects on GI tissues, which appeared unrelated to a direct cytoprotective effect by the agent. The indirect pathway appears to involve suppression of secretion by GI lumen-modifying pancreatic enzymes. Mice administered SOM230 starting before or after TBI exposures survived at higher rates and exhibited extended survival times regardless of when drug was initially administered [156]; there was no additional benefit when the drug treatments were extended. SOM230 survival benefit was reversed by coadministration of pancreatic enzymes. Consistent with the presumed non-cytoprotective mechanism of action, SOM230 did not influence hematopoietic injury or intestinal crypt lethality; however, SOM230 preserved mucosal surface area and reduced bacterial translocation in a dose-dependent manner. Circulating IL-12 levels were reduced in SOM230-treated mice. Rigorous assessments showed no observed SOM230 toxicity. SOM230 is an excellent radiation mitigator with a post-irradiation time window in excess of 48 h [157]. The mechanism involves decreased secretion of pancreatic enzymes in the bowel lumen, thus preserving the intestinal barrier function.

2.4.12 IGF-1

IGF-1 is known to decrease apoptosis and promote hematopoietic progenitor cell survival. These features, along with its demonstrated safety profile in humans [158], make IGF-1 an attractive candidate for treatment of patients with failing, radiation-induced hematopoietic systems. Mice treated with IGF-1 after lethal TBI show clear and significant hematopoietic recovery acceleration, by protecting HSCs and early marrow progenitors from apoptosis and promoting enhanced proliferation and differentiation within the myeloid compartment: all of which serve to improve overall survival [159].

2.4.13 Anti-ceramide antibody

Ceramide, an inflammatory molecule, is generated on the surface of endothelium, which coalesces to form ceramide-rich platforms that transmit apoptotic signals. Anti-ceramide monoclonal antibody, 2A2, binds to ceramide, preventing platform formation on the surface of endothelial cells, which protects against apoptosis and facilitates recovery of crypt stem cell clonogens in radiation-induced GI syndrome [160]. In brief, 2A2 represents a prototype of a new class of anti-ceramide therapeutics and an effective countermeasure against the radiation GI syndrome.

2.4.14 Histone deacetylase inhibitor, phenylbutyrate

Histone deacetylase inhibitors can suppress cutaneous radiation syndrome and stimulate hematopoiesis. Phenylbutyrate (PB), a novel anti-tumor agent, provided radioprotection against γ-radiation when administered before irradiation and demonstrated a DRF of 1.31 in mouse model. When administered post-irradiation, it provided significant radiomitigation [161]. Prophylactic treatment was associated with significant elevations in neutrophils and platelets. Results demonstrated that PB treatment before radiation can attenuate DNA damage and inhibit radiation-induced apoptosis.

2.4.15 Geldanamycin analog 17-DMAG

Single dose administrations of 17-dimethylamino-ethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG) increased survival of irradiated mice [162]. Mice pretreated with 17-DMAG showed attenuation of bone marrow aplasia in femurs after irradiation with recovered expressions of CD34 and CD44, and survival in bone marrow cells was observed. 17-DMAG also elevated serum G-CSF levels, decreased serum fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand levels and reduced white blood cell depletion. 17-DMAG ameliorated small intestinal histological damage and promoted recovery of villi and intestinal crypts including stem cells. It was not efficacious if administered after irradiation.

3. Conclusion

Intellectual property rights and exclusive marketing ownership attract the entrepreneurially oriented biomedical research community, thus fostering innovation in the general area of drug development. Major pharmaceutical companies with significant capabilities are generally not interested in developing agents with relatively small market opportunities and limited future revenue potentials. Funding opportunities for the development of agents, like radiation countermeasures, are mostly dependent on government resources. Project BioShield provides new opportunities to improve medical countermeasures against chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear attack through the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasure Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and BARDA. BARDA provides significant financial support to several start-up companies and other institutions for development of agents demonstrating efficacy in preliminary studies.

Radiation countermeasures are considered ‘emergency need drugs’ and do not have attractive future revenue generation. As a result, these potentially useful medicinals are often granted ‘orphan drug status’ by the US FDA and are defined as those intended for the safe and effective treatment, diagnosis or prevention of rare diseases or disorders that affect fewer than 200,000 people in the US, < 5 per 10,000 people in a community, or that affect > 200,000 persons but are not expected to recover the costs of developing and marketing a drug. Assignment as an ‘orphan drug’ provides the drug’s manufacturer or pharmaceutical company tax reductions and exclusive rights to the cure for a specific indication for a period of 7 years post-approval. It encourages corporations to enter a market where the costs of development are less likely to be recouped, due to the smaller pool of individuals needing the cure.

Usually, the US FDA considers radiation countermeasures under ‘fast track’ approval processes which are designed to facilitate development, expedite the review and approval processes of new treatments of serious or life-threatening conditions. Filling an unmet medical need is defined as providing a therapy where none exists or one that may be superior to currently available therapy. Most countermeasures at more advanced stages of development have received FDA fast-track status.

Although significant advances have been made, investigations of radiation countermeasures have proceeded slowly and with considerable difficulties. Preclinical work is necessary to establish the countermeasure’s potential efficacy and drug mechanism because conventional clinical efficacy trials in humans are not possible due to ethical reasons (except for countermeasures intended for use in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy). Human efficacy trials are substituted with a very stringent, possibly more difficult, FDA approval pathway: the Animal Efficacy Rule, which requires a good understanding of mechanistic knowledge in two or more animal models predictive of human response [163]. This pathway relies heavily on a large animal model for preclinical safety and efficacy studies, for which resources are limited. Despite massive investment by the US federal government, only five drugs have been approved under Animal Efficacy Rule since 2001 [164].

Demands on large animal research facilities will no doubt increase significantly as a result of the Animal Efficacy Rule. The number of adequate animal models is one main limiting factor for radiation countermeasure development and biomarker discovery; only two large animal models (NHP and canines) have been well characterized [165,166]. NHPs are necessary for preclinical development because of similarities of drug metabolism and physiology between NHPs and humans. Previous experience has shown that canine pharmacokinetics are not always relevant to primate efficacy [167]; consequently, the rhesus macaque is generally the large animal model of choice for toxicity, pharmacokinetics, biomarker, radiation injury and countermeasure investigations. Further, the FDA generally accepts rhesus macaques as the appropriate model for pivotal efficacy testing whenever human efficacy testing cannot be performed and the Animal Efficacy Rule is implemented.

Recently, swine have been suggested as one of the promising species for drug evaluation [165]. The pig model (specifically using the Gottingen minipig) is currently in an initial developmental stage [168]. Additional long-term large animal models for ARS need to be developed and validated to facilitate advanced development of radiation countermeasures.

4. Expert opinion

Since the US FDA has not approved a single drug specifically for ARS arising from radiation exposure, a better public-private partnership is required to boost development. Independent of the FDA’s approval and licensing process, the US Federal government has procured G-CSF (Neupogen), along with GM-CSF (Leukine), to be stockpiled in the Strategic National Stockpile under the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Reauthorization Act of 2013 [169].

During the Joint Meeting of the Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee and the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee held on May 3, 2013, committee members overwhelmingly voted (17:1) to support the notion that filgrastim (G-CSF) will produce clinical benefits in humans exposed to radiation doses likely to induce myelosuppression [63]. However, there are reservations; it is likely that most individuals who will survive a nuclear incident would have received radiation doses too low to cause myelosuppression, and filgrastim administration may not provide clinical benefit. The effectiveness of filgrastim after sub-lethal radiation exposure is not well established [170]. In most radiation incidents, there will be partial sparing of bone marrow and stimulation of the victim’s own marrow recovery by G-CSF appears to be a potentially effective strategy.

To refine and optimize filgrastim administration after a nuclear incident scenario, additional information is needed based on the timing of filgrastim administration, use after a variety of radiation doses, and the effects on combined injury (wound, burn, hemorrhage). A recent report suggests that pegylated G-CSF, although effective after TBI, is not able to provide protection in a combined injury (irradiation and burn covering 15% total-body-surface-area) mouse model [77].

To optimize filgrastim administration to radiological/nuclear victims, estimations of radiation dose and the clinical status of the victims would be useful. The stability of filgrastim and the implementation plans in the radiological nuclear incident scenario are concerns as well. Additional apprehension regarding G-CSF’s usefulness as a radiation medical countermeasure also has been raised due to its potential negative effects on radiation-induced lung injury and radiation-induced tumorigenesis [171]. Additionally, critical, pivotal G-CSF studies often have utilized intensive supportive care; in a mass casualty scenario, the analogous treatments will be severely limited [53].

Additional concerns are the side effects of G-CSF administration which include fever, myalgia, respiratory distress, hypoxia, splenomegaly, sickle cell crisis and incidences of Sweet’s syndrome (acute febrile neutropenia dermatosis/skin plaques) [172]. G-CSF treatments have also delayed platelet recovery. [173]. Cancer-prone patients receiving a G-CSF regimen have a slightly increased risk of developing a myeloproliferative-type disorder.

In 2011, a World Health Organization panel of experts convened to develop recommendations for radiation-induced hematopoietic injury management in a mass casualty scenario. The committee strongly indorsed G-CSF or GM-CSF administration within 24 h of exposure (if possible), to victims exposed to doses > 2 Gy, if the neutrophil count is below 0.5 × 10⁹ cells/l and likely to persist for a week or more [174]. It is important to note that study results suggest that benefit was achieved even if G-CSF administration was delayed for several days or even weeks [172]. Pegylated G-CSF could be used as an alternative to G-CSF. CSFs should be administered for 2 – 3 weeks before considering stem cell or progenitor cell transplant therapy.

There are several promising radiation countermeasures under advanced stages of development; the progress of 5-AED, genistein and CBLB502 has slowed due to various reasons. Ex-RAD efficacy studies in the NHP-model are being initiated. Recent developments with HemaMax and OrbeShield indicate that they are ‘on track’ relative to regulatory approval.

Article highlights.

• To date, no radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) has been approved by the US FDA for human use.

• G-CSF may receive US FDA approval. FDA advisory committee members voted that the benefits will outweigh the risks of G-CSF therapy.

• Seven promising radiation countermeasures for ARS agents have been granted US FDA investigational new drug status.

• Amifostine is the only FDA-approved radioprotective agent for human use; the authorization is for a few defined and limited, clinical indications.

• γ-Tocotrienol and AEOL 10150 have demonstrated radioprotective efficacy in nonhuman primates.

• Some agents only ameliorate certain manifestations of radiation injury. Investigations using agent combinations with complimentary activities are gaining momentum.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Acknowledgements

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the professional views of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Department of Defense, USA.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article