2,429
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease

&
Pages 261-264 | Published online: 06 Feb 2012

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is fundamentally a relapsing and remitting disease appearing in forms of ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) with a non-well-known etiology. With the hope to prevent adverse drug events and to increase the efficacy of therapies for IBD, in the recent years, other than new monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab, the novel phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) have been introduced. Among PDE4Is, rolipram, OPC-6535, mesopram, roflumilast and tetomilast have shown beneficial effects in experimental colitis. Unfortunately until now, human studies have not been successful in showing significant superiority of PDE4Is in the treatment of IBD. Parallel with discovery of PDE4Is and their anti-inflammatory properties, inhibiting other PDE isoenzymes in immune and proinflammatory cells is on the way. PDE7Is have shown synergistic effect with PDE4Is and they may act similar to PDE3Is in experimental settings. Sildenafil as the PDE5I has shown good effects in experimental colitis by balancing oxidant–antioxidant status. Although the present data about PDE superfamily and their specific roles in gastrointestinal tract is limited but inhibitors of PDE4, PDE5 and PDE7 seem good candidates as the next generation of effective drugs. The synergistic anti-inflammatory effect of PDE4Is and PDE7Is is also important.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is fundamentally a relapsing and remitting disease appearing in forms of ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Intestinal mucosal inflammation, followed by bloody-mucous diarrhea and abdominal pain are main demonstrations. The etiology of IBD is not absolutely determined yet but it seems to be multifactorial where role of genetics cannot be ignored. In the recent years, major reviews have been conducted and have clarified the involvement of some pathological cytokines Citation[1], immune dysfunction Citation[2], potassium channel openers Citation[3], adenosine triphosphate (ATP) donors Citation[4] and various phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) Citation[5,6]. Potential of current medicines in causing adverse effects and the high morbidity of IBD have urged investigators to expand their studies to find out better understandings of the disease pathophysiology.

Therefore, investigators try to target specific cells, cytokines and receptors but side effects and inability to cure the disease still concern. With the hope to prevent adverse events and to increase the efficacy, new studies target the affected tissues. Keeping these in mind, other than new monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab, the novel PDEIs have been newly introduced.

PDEIs elevate the level of second messengers including cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) in different organs. They activate protein kinases followed by phosphorylation of a wide variety of cellular substances and finally cellular functions. The concentration of cAMP and cGMP depends on the balance between synthesis and degradation. PDE consists of several families with different subtypes and activities. Each member of PDE superfamily is involved in different functions in different organs and consequently in several pathophysiologic conditions such as inflammatory diseases, cancer and neurodegeneration. Thus, it is not surprising to track a wide range of effects of PDEIs in different pathophysiological conditions. Targeting PDE as non-specific inhibition was considered in the first generation of PDEIs and specific inhibitors are now called second-generation ones. For example, theophylline as a first-generation PDEI poses anti-inflammatory effects especially in the respiratory system but current evidences are not convincing Citation[7]. It is notable that various first- and second-generation PDEIs have been isolated from herbal medicines Citation[8].

As recently reviewed by Salari-Sharif and Abdollahi Citation[6], among PDEIs, PDE 4 family is the dominant isoenzyme in inflammatory cells and consists of four genes (A – D). The principal variant of PDE4 in the most inflammatory and immunomudulatory cells are PDE4A, PDE4B and PDE4D. The anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects of PDE4Is are currently targeted by most of the investigators. The anti-inflammatory effect of PDE4Is is the result of suppression of cAMP in inflammatory mediators and cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (INF-γ), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). The similarity between different inflammatory pathogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases has raised the concern about effectiveness of PDE4Is in IBD. Animal studies have shown favorable effects of rolipram, OPC-6535, mesopram, roflumilast and tetomilast in experimental colitis. Unfortunately until now, human studies have failed to show success in the superiority of PDE4Is in the treatment of IBD. In the Phase II randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study on 186 patients with mild to moderate UC, the primary end point (disease activity index) did not show significant improvement in the tetomilast group in comparison with placebo while the secondary end point achieved by post hoc analysis indicated that patients with high disease activity scores respond better to tetomilast Citation[9]. The Phase III study could not show significant difference between tetomilast and placebo at primary and secondary end points; however, there was a trend toward decreasing severity of bleeding in tetomilast group Citation[10].

Parallel with discovery of PDE4Is and their anti-inflammatory properties, inhibiting other PDE isoenzymes in immune and proinflammatory cells is on the way. PDE7Is are regulated by two genes (A and B). Formerly, it was found that up-regulation of PDE7A may be involved in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory conditions including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Investigation in regulation of PDE7A has identified its role in peripheral CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes in lung, immune system, skeletal muscle, heart and the kidney. Inhibition of PDE7 has no proved anti-inflammatory effect in normal condition but it promotes antibody response to injection of vaccine. Furthermore, it has been proposed that PDE7Is have synergistic effect with PDE4Is and they may act the same as PDE3Is in experimental settings Citation[11]. Apart from PDE4, involvement of PDE7 in induction and function of mouse cytotoxic T lymphocytes via intracellular cAMP has been suggested Citation[12]. This finding may be of great help toward finding new therapeutic drugs for autoimmune diseases.

The other family of PDE is PDE5 family in which its inhibition has different pharmacological effects. Sildenafil, the selective PDE5I, increases cGMP and relaxes smooth muscle cells while recent studies have indicated its anti-inflammatory action by nitric oxide (NO)-dependent mechanisms which prevent leukocyte adhesion Citation[13]. An in vivo study reported beneficial effect of sildenafil in experimental colitis by balancing oxidant–antioxidant status and inhibiting reactive oxygen metabolites (ROM) production and release of cytokines Citation[13,14]. Notably, PDEIs may mediate immunosuppressive action of adenosine by increasing cAMP Citation[14].

The studies that investigated the possible effects of PDEIs on inflammation and/or colitis are summarized in .

Table 1. Summary of studies investigated by various types of PDEIs in human IBD or animal colitis.

Expert opinion

Taken together it seems that PDEIs have helped to better understand the role of inflammation and autoimmune drive in the pathogenesis of IBD. Presently, data about PDE superfamily is limited and further investigations into their specific roles in gastrointestinal tract would be of great importance. Other than PDE4, PDE5 and PDE7, the present knowledge about the rest of PDE superfamily is limited; however, investigations into the benefits of these three subfamilies are promising. Thus, more attention to PDE4 and PDE5 and their specific inhibitors that affect intestine are of further significance. Likewise, more studies on the synergistic anti-inflammatory effect of PDE4Is and PDE7Is or other combinations of PDEIs are highly recommended.

Declaration of interest

This paper is the outcome of an in-house non-financially supported study on an invitation of Prof. Mohammad Abdollahi by the senior editor of Expert Opinion on Investigational New Drugs. Authors have no conflict of interest.

Bibliography

  • Rezaie A, Parker RD, Abdollahi M. Oxidative stress and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease: an epiphenomenon or the cause? Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:2015-21
  • Nikfar S, Mirfazaelian H, Abdollahi M. Efficacy and tolerability of immunoregulators and antibiotics in fistulizing Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Curr Pharm Des 2010;16(33):3684-98
  • Hosseini-Tabatabaei A, Abdollahi M. Potassium channel openers and improvement of toxic stress: do they have role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease? Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2008;7(3):129-35
  • Salari P, Abdollahi M. Current opinion in the pharmaceutical management of irritable and inflammatory bowel diseases: role of ATP. Recent Pat Endocr Metabol Immun Drug Discov 2009;3(1):69-75
  • Khoshakhlagh P, Bahrololoumi-Shapourabadi M, Mohammadirad A, Beneficial effect of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor in experimental inflammatory bowel disease; molecular evidence for involvement of oxidative stress. Toxicol Mech Methods 2007;17:281-8
  • Salari-Sharif P, Abdollahi M. Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: a comprehensive review. Curr Pharm Des 2010;16:3661-7
  • Salari P, Mojtahedzadeh M, Najafi A, Comparison of the effect of aminophylline and low PEEP vs. high PEEP on EGF concentration in critically ill patients with ALI/ARDS. J Clin Pharm Ther 2005;30:139-44
  • Rahimi R, Ghiasi S, Azimi H, A review of the herbal phosphodiesterase inhibitors; Future perspective of new drugs. Cytokine 2010;49:123-9
  • Schreiber S, Keshavarzian A, Isaacs KL, A randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study of tetomilast in active ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2007;132:76-86
  • Keshavarzian A, Mutlu E, Guzman JP, Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors and inflammatory bowel disease: emerging therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007;16(9):1489-506
  • Giembycz MA, Smith SJ. Phosphodiesterase 7A: a new therapeutic target for alleviating chronic inflammation? Curr Pharm Des 2006;12:3207-20
  • Kadoshima-Yamaoka K, Murakawa M, Goto M, Effect of phosphodiesterase 7 inhibitor ASB16165 on development and function of cytotoxic T lymphocyte. Int Immunopharmacol 2009;9:97-102
  • Iseri SO, Ersoy Y, Ercan F, The effect of sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor, on acetic acid-induced colonic inflammation in the rat. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;24:1142-8
  • Ernst PB, Garrison JC, Thompson LF. Much Ado about adenosine: adenosine synthesis and function in regulatory T cell biology. J Immunol 2010;185:1993-8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.