738
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

An adjusted indirect comparison of everolimus and sorafenib therapy in sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients using repeated matched samples

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1491-1497 | Published online: 21 May 2011
 

Abstract

Objective: To date, no trial data exist comparing treatment outcomes for everolimus versus sorafenib. The current analysis indirectly compares the overall survival (OS) benefit of everolimus and sorafenib as second-line treatment options.

Research design and methods: A single-arm sorafenib study is selected as a basis to match an everolimus sunitinib-refractory subpopulation of the RECORD-1 trial. Only patients with clear cell histology are included. An adjusted matching approach is taken where 1000 repeated random samples matched to the sorafenib population on risk score distribution are produced, and a 95% CI around the mean of all sampled median OS is generated.

Main outcome measures: The main outcome measures include adjusted median OS and progression-free survival.

Results: In all, 45 clear cell histology sorafenib patients and 1000 samples of N = 41 sunitinib-refractory everolimus patients are considered for analysis. After adjusted matching, the estimated median OS benefit is 32.7 weeks (95% CI: 22, 64) and 81.5 weeks (95% CI: 78, 86) for sorafenib and everolimus patients, respectively.

Conclusion: Results suggest that sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with everolimus may experience significantly improved OS outcomes compared to those treated with sorafenib. However, because this is not a randomized controlled trial, the results should be interpreted as those from an observational study.

View correction statement:
Erratum
Erratum

Acknowledgment

Editorial assistance was provided by A Perrin, an employee of Analytica International. Funding for the work was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. These data were presented in part at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, June 4 – 8 2010, Chicago, IL and at the European Society for Medical Oncology 35th Annual Congress, October 8 – 12 2010, Milan, Italy.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 884.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.