Adherence to biologic DMARD therapies in rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Importance of the field: The efficacy of the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) shown in clinical trials may be jeopardized due to prevalent poor patient adherence.

Areas covered in this review: Patient adherence including compliance and persistence with biologic DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis.

What the reader will gain: This is a comprehensive review of the literature. The various definitions and methodologies of measurement used in adherence research are reviewed and data are presented by separating compliance and persistence. Differences in compliance rates were mainly based on numerical trends. There was evidence for and against greater persistence with infliximab versus adalimumab and etanercept. There was a trend in favour of greater compliance and lower persistence with TNF-α inhibitor monotherapy versus in combination therapy with methotrexate.

Take home message: The evidence suggests that adherence to biologic DMARDs is suboptimal. When further research is applied in the field, agreed definitions and methodology need to be used to allow for cross-study comparisons. In addition, adherence should be assessed in conjunction with clinical outcomes and not on its own so that it can be better understood what levels of adherence provide the required clinical outcomes.

Keywords::

• adherence
• biologic DMARDs
• compliance
• persistence
• rheumatoid arthritis

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Laszlo Czirjak for his comments on the manuscript.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.