866
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Systemic safety of anti-VEGF drugs: a commentary

, BSc MSc (Medical Statistician) , , MBBS FRCS FRCOphth PhD (Professor of Ophthalmology and Vision Science) , , BA DPhil MSc PhD MFPHM (Professorial Research Fellow in Health Services Research) & , BSc PhD PGCE (Reader in Medical Statistics)
Pages 379-388 | Published online: 09 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Introduction: VEGF is a mediator of angiogenesis. Thus, concerns have been expressed following the use of VEGF inhibitors for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Ranibizumab, and more recently aflibercept, are VEGF inhibitors licensed for the treatment of nAMD. Bevacizumab is also used but unlicensed for this application.

Areas covered: A non-systematic review of nAMD trials was undertaken to investigate four outcomes: all-cause mortality, all systemic serious adverse events (SSAEs), arteriothrombotic events (ATEs) and gastrointestinal (GI) complications. Differences in event rates with injections of ranibizumab compared to bevacizumab, aflibercept, photodynamic therapy (PDT) and sham were explored and quantified using fixed-effect meta-analyses.

Expert opinion: Anti-VEGF agents can influence vascular health; however, the data suggest no difference in the risk of an ATE or death between anti-VEGF agents. Clinical trials are limited in their size and eligibility criteria and databases of patients treated in routine practice should also be scrutinized.

Declaration of interest

This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the British Heart Foundation (BHF). CA Rogers has received financial support from Novartis. U Chakravarthy has received institutional support from Novartis and institutional and consultant support from Bayer and Roche. BC Reeves has received financial support from Janssen-Cilag. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Notes

This box summarizes key points contained in the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 752.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.