![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the quality of reporting and its correlates in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture for cancer pain. Quality of reporting for included papers was assessed against a subset of criteria adapted from the CONSORT 2010 statement and STRICTA. An overall quality score (OQS) and a combined key methodologic index score (MIS) was calculated for each trial. Factors associated with OQS and MIS were then identified. A total of 32 RCTs were included in the full text. The median OQS based on the CONSORT Statement and STRICTA was 4.0 and 0, respectively. The significant predictors for CONSORT OQS were year of publication and nationality of authors, for STRICTA it was nationality of authors and for MIS it was publication language. The quality of reporting in RCTs on acupuncture for cancer pain was poor. This indicates that RCTs on acupuncture for cancer pain need substantial improvement.
Acknowledgements
Study concepts: L Lu and M Liao. Study design: L Lu, M Liao and J Zeng. Data acquisition: L Lu and J Zeng. Quality control of data and algorithms: L Lu, M Liao and J He. Data analysis and interpretation: L Lu and M Liao. Statistical analysis: L Lu, J Zeng and J He. Manuscript preparation: L Lu, J Zeng. Manuscript editing: L Lu and J He. Manuscript review: M Liao and J He.
Financial & competing interests disclosure
The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.
No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.