147
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Students as facilitators in a teacher training program: motivation for leadership roles

, &
Pages 615-620 | Published online: 13 Nov 2015

Abstract

Introduction

Although students often partake in peer-teaching activities during medical school, they are rarely provided with formal training in teaching. We have previously described our teacher training (TT) program for medical students. The TT program is delivered face-to-face across two sessions. In order to alleviate academic teaching load required to run the course, and at the same time provide our final-year students with practical opportunities to develop their leadership skills, we engaged five senior students as co-facilitators alongside academic staff. By developing an understanding of our students’ motivation to participate as facilitators, we may be able to promote an interest within leadership in teaching among other students. Our study sought to examine students’ motivation to take part as facilitators in the TT program.

Methods

Data were collected through a focus group session with the five student facilitators. Self-determination theory, which poses that there are three elements key to intrinsic motivation, including autonomy, competence, and relatedness, was used as a conceptual lens to identify and code recurrent themes in the data.

Results

Elements that motivated students to assist in facilitation included an opportunity to review and build on their knowledge and skills in teaching practices; the recognition and acknowledgement received from school staff and fellow students; the opportunity to develop these relationships; and a desire to increase their peer-teaching responsibilities.

Conclusion

By actively involving our students in leadership practices, we were able to not only engage the students, but also develop our student community and contribute to the promotion of a culture of excellence in teaching within the hospital.

Introduction

Although students often partake in peer-teaching activities during medical school, they are rarely provided with formal training in teaching.Citation1 We have previously described our teacher training (TT) program for medical students.Citation2 The purpose of the program is to assist senior students in preparation for their roles as peer teachers within medical schoolCitation3,Citation4 and also to better prepare them for their future roles as medical practitioners with teaching, supervision, and assessment responsibilities.Citation5 The TT program is delivered face-to-face, with topics including skills teaching, small group teaching, bedside teaching, assessment, and feedback. Implemented across two 3-hour sessions, delivery includes both large group interactive teaching and small group active learning. The program is resource-intensive to run, requiring at least seven facilitators for each session, in particular for the small group activities.

In order to alleviate the academic teaching load required to run the course, and at the same time to provide our final-year (year 4) students with practical opportunities to develop their leadership skills, we engaged a core group of students as co-facilitators of our TT program alongside two academic staff. While traditional approaches to development of leadership skills involve “courses” in leadership, it has been suggested that development of leadership skills should be addressed within the early stages of medical education and continued throughout a doctor’s career.Citation6 Further, this development should be nurtured and supported by the organization in which they learn and work.Citation6 These newly created leadership roles, we felt, would highlight for students the importance of promoting excellence in teaching skills within the medical profession.Citation7

By developing an understanding of students’ motivation to assume such roles, we may be able to promote an interest within leadership in teaching among other students. Motivation has been described as a person’s willingness to apply effort in order to achieve a particular goal,Citation8 but it is a complex concept. While both extrinsic and intrinsic motivators are evident, intrinsic motivation is a powerful influence.Citation9 Self-determination theory (SDT)Citation9 offers a conceptual lens to view facilitators’ intrinsic motivation. SDT poses that three elements are key to intrinsic motivation: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Autonomy relates to students’ sense of independence and choice. Competence relates to students’ aim to gain mastery of a subject. Relatedness refers to students’ sense of community among others with similar interests.

Our study sought to examine students’ motivation to take part as facilitators in the TT program.

Methods

Context

The TT program was conducted in March 2014 at Sydney Medical School – Central, based at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Camperdown, NSW, Australia), where year 3 and year 4 students gain clinical experience in their final 2 years of the graduate-entry medical program. Participants enrolled in the program were from year 3 of the medical program and facilitators were from year 4.

Structure and content of the program

The program was run across two 3-hour sessions. In total, 23 year 3 students voluntarily participated in the program. The program was delivered as a four-module face-to-face program, providing theoretical background, practical examples, and active participation in “skills teaching”, “small group teaching”, “clinical teaching”, and “assessment and feedback”.Citation2 Facilitation included interactive large-group PowerPoint presentations as well as two small-group sessions. Each small-group session consisted of three to four participants. During the small-group sessions, participants were required to teach their peers a short 5–10 minute microteaching activity. The first activity was to teach a nonmedical skill and the second activity was a teaching presentation on a medical topic. Participants were required to provide feedback to their peers during the small-group sessions.

Facilitators

Two senior academic staff led facilitation. In total, at least seven facilitators were required to run the sessions, including the two senior academic facilitators. We invited eight of our year 4 students by email to assist in facilitation, and in particular, to supervise the small-group sessions. Students selected to facilitate were those with a good academic record, with a good attendance and participation record, and who had previously completed the TT program themselves as year 3 students. We limited the initial invitation to eight students as we felt that five to eight students would provide adequate resources, and we were unsure of the likely response.

Facilitator responsibilities

Although the senior academic staff (two associate deans) led the large group sessions, the students had minor roles within these sessions, such as speaking to some of the PowerPoint slides and demonstrating the teaching of a skill. Student facilitators had independent responsibilities for facilitation of their own small groups. They were required to facilitate each student in teaching a skill within the group, give a short tutorial, and ensure correct feedback by other members of the group (as well as their own feedback). Students were thanked by the associate dean of the school and given a certificate at the end of the course.

To prepare for their facilitator roles, students were required to attend a 1-hour meeting where they were briefed on their responsibilities and how to teach within the small groups and were provided with facilitator packages containing the PowerPoint presentations, facilitator guidelines, and a detailed schedule.

Data collection and analysis

Student facilitators were invited to attend a focus group. Data were transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis of the qualitative data was done using Framework Analysis.Citation10 SDT was used as the conceptual framework for this paper and to subsequently develop a thematic framework, which was applied to a portion of the dataset by two authors to determine its trustworthiness. Subsequently, a coding framework was developed to code the entire dataset in order to identify and code recurrent themes in the data.Citation10

Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee.

Results

Of the eight students who were invited to be facilitators, five agreed to participate.

All five student facilitators attended the focus group. Of the five, four were female and one was male.

Using the components of SDT, including autonomy, competence, and relatedness, as the conceptual framework, students’ motivation to take part as facilitators is demonstrated in .

Table 1 Students’ motivation in relation to autonomy

Table 2 Students’ motivation in relation to competence

Table 3 Students’ motivation in relation to relatedness

Discussion

Our final-year students were provided with an opportunity to undertake important leadership roles as facilitators. Their participation provided a crucial resource to run our TT program. Using SDT as a conceptual framework, this study sought to explore students’ motivation to facilitate the TT program for their junior peers.

Autonomy

A sense of choice is desired by most people,Citation11 and students were free to choose whether or not to accept the invitation to facilitate. Although autonomy does not mean working separately from others,Citation12 autonomy was fostered by providing students with the opportunity to use their knowledge and prior training in teaching to take responsibility for their own small groups. Some were also given a role within the large group teaching alongside the senior academic staff. By choosing to be facilitators in the TT program, students felt they were able to help shape the quality of teaching for fellow students.Citation13

Competence

Individuals enjoy mastering subjects in which they are engaged.Citation14 Reflective practice has the potential to engage and motivate individuals to even higher levels of expertise.Citation15 Although our facilitators had already completed the TT course themselves as year 3 students, they felt facilitation in TT provided them with opportunities to practice and reinforce their teaching skills. Certainly, facilitators expressed a sense of achievement and enjoyment in running their own small groups, stating that it presented new challenges to them. For example, our facilitators found it challenging to develop appropriate techniques to correct students’ teaching methods during these small-group activities. An optimum level of challenge is important in working toward mastery of a subject,Citation11 and our facilitators aspired to improve their professionalism skills in teaching, recognizing this as a graduate attribute that is required in future medical practice.

Relatedness

A sense of community may be fostered within groups of individuals with similar goals,Citation16,Citation17 and medical education involves a process of socialization.Citation18 The social context of the TT activities promoted communal engagement, not only among students, but also with senior academic staff. Student facilitators expressed an understanding of how their contributions as facilitators might impact on their school community at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital.Citation6 By embedding leadership development in students’ hospital-based activities, students could see how their role as facilitators linked to the development of their school, their hospital, and the medical profession as a whole.Citation19 Students recognized the importance of teaching in their future medical careers, realizing that teaching formed part of their professional identity.

Limitations

The major limitation of our study was the small number of participants. The views of these participants may not be generalizable to a wider student population.

Conclusion

An understanding of students’ motivation to participate in leadership roles may help to develop future opportunities for students within our medical school. Importantly, student facilitators conveyed an appreciation of the teaching and supervision responsibilities they will assume in their future careers as medical practitioners. Senior students’ motivation to assist with facilitation of the course was largely related to the opportunity to review and build on their own knowledge and skills in teaching practices; the recognition and acknowledgement received from school staff and fellow students; the opportunity to develop these relationships; and the desire to increase their peer-teaching responsibilities. By actively involving our senior students in leadership practices, we were able to not only engage the students, but also develop our student community and contribute to the promotion of a culture of excellence in teaching within the hospital.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • BurgessAMcGregorDMellisCMedical students as peer tutors: a systematic reviewBMC Med Educ20141411524912500
  • van DiggeleCBurgessAMellisCTeacher training program for medical students: improvements neededAdv Med Educ Pract2015626527025878520
  • BurgessAClarkTChapmanRMellisCSenior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCEMed Teach2013351586223102164
  • BurgessAWRobertsCBlackKIMellisCSenior medical student perceived ability and experience in giving peer feedback in formative long case examinationsBMC Med Educ2013137923725417
  • CushingAAbbotSLothianDHallAWestwoodOMPeer feedback as an aid to learning – what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!Med Teach20113310511221275542
  • SwanwickTMcKimmJClinical leadership development requires system-wide interventions, not just coursesClin Teach20129899322405361
  • HillFStephensCNegotiating strategic direction for education staff development: the Southampton experienceMed Teach200426764564915763857
  • SnowmanJBiehlerRPsychology Applied to TeachingBoston, New YorkHoughton Mifflin Company2003
  • DeciELRyanRMThe “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behaviourPsychol Inq200011227268
  • BraunVClarkeVUsing thematic analysis in psychologyQual Res Psychol20063277101
  • LynessJMLurieSJWardDSMooneyCJLambertDREngaging students and faculty: implications of self-determination theory for teachers and leaders in academic medicineBMC Med Educ20131315124215369
  • SchumacherDJEnglanderRCarraccioCDeveloping the master learner: applying learning theory to the learner, the teacher, and the learning environmentAcad Med201388111635164524072107
  • SwanwickTInformal learning in postgraduate medical education: from cognitivism to ‘culturism’Med Educ20053985986516048629
  • RyffCDKeyesCLThe structure of psychological well-being revisitedJ Pers Soc Psychol1995697197277473027
  • GladwellMOutliers: The Story of SuccessNew YorkLittle, Brown and Company2008
  • PinkDHDrive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates UsNew YorkRiverhead Books2009
  • BaumeisterRFLearyMRThe need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivationPsychol Bull199511734975297777651
  • DornanTBundyCWhat can experience add to early medical education? Consensus surveyBMJ2004329747083415472265
  • LombardoMMEichingerRWCareer Architect Development Planner3rd edMinneapolisLominger Limited2000